Indonesia - Liga 1Gelora Madura Ratu Pamelingan StadiumData current as of September 18, 2026

Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: match statistics

Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Madura United played against PSIM Yogyakarta in Liga 1 (Indonesia). The game was played on September 18, 2026. Venue: Gelora Madura Ratu Pamelingan Stadium. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Madura United has 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. PSIM Yogyakarta has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 0.50 points per game.

Scoring records

Madura United scores 2.50 goals per game and allows 0.50. PSIM Yogyakarta scores 0.50 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.90 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Madura United's games and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 0%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

PSIM Yogyakarta has the higher season xG average, 1.47 to 1.39 per game. Madura United takes 11.0 shots per game, while PSIM Yogyakarta takes 12.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Madura United leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 2.00 goals per game after halftime. PSIM Yogyakarta leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.50 after halftime.

When the teams score

Madura United's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (2 goals). For PSIM Yogyakarta, it is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 1 games average 2.90 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Madura United have won both of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2 goals per game and conceding none, while PSIM Yogyakarta lost their only away match 0:1. The hosts are creating significantly better chances, as reflected by their average xG of 1.81 compared with 1.34 for the visitors, who allow opponents as much as 2.51 xG away from home. Madura tend to control games more effectively, averaging 58% possession and 16 shots per match, compared with PSIM’s 45% and 12 shots. The Yogyakarta-based side have failed to score in 100% of their away matches so far, while Madura have kept a clean sheet in every home fixture, strongly supporting a home win. Both teams have conceded 6 goals across their last five matches, but home advantage and Madura’s significantly more solid defense point towards a controlled victory for the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal is driven primarily by current form: in their last 5 matches, both Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta recorded BTTS in 60% of games. During this period, Madura averaged 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while PSIM scored 1.2 and also conceded 1.2 goals per match. The hosts have an average xG of 1.60, while PSIM allow opponents as much as 2.51 xG, which significantly increases the chance of a Madura goal. The visitors have failed to score in the available season data and have 100% of matches without a goal scored, but their latest xG stands at 1.85, compared with Madura's 1.72 xG conceded recently, so a breakthrough is realistic. The league-wide BTTS rate of 61% further supports a scenario in which both teams find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The 2.70-goal projection is based on the strong matchup between Madura United’s attack, which has a seasonal xG of 1.60, and PSIM Yogyakarta’s defense, which allows as much as 2.51 xG per match. At the same time, the visitors should not remain completely passive, as they have averaged 1.85 xG over their last 5 matches, while Madura United has allowed 1.72 xG during this period. Both teams have conceded 6 goals in their last 5 matches, while results featuring Over 2.5 goals occurred in 60% of Madura’s matches and 40% of PSIM’s games in this run, pointing more toward a 2-3-goal range than an open, high-scoring game. The Under 3.5 line has the edge, as seasonal data shows that 100% of matches involving both teams ended with a maximum of three goals, while the expected combined total remains clearly below four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Madura United have the stronger potential to secure the full-time victory: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.8 goals and won 60% of their games, compared with PSIM Yogyakarta’s 1.2 goals and 40% win rate. The strongest argument in favor of the home side is the second half, in which they have averaged 1.2 goals, won the half in 80% of these matches, and recorded 2.4 points per game, while the visitors managed only 0.6 goals and 0.8 points. PSIM also have a weak defensive profile based on xG conceded, allowing an average of 2.51 xG compared with Madura’s 0.95, which should increase the home side’s advantage as the match progresses. The scenario of Madura taking the lead at the break is supported by the fact that they were ahead after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five appearances, compared with 40% for their opponents. Although a draw at half-time remains a realistic possibility, the most likely single outcome is for the home side to lead at half-time and win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
20Shots13
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
9Shots on target5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.47xG1.73
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
6Corners7
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
80Dangerous attacks77
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
-1Fouls-1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1Cards4
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.5Goals scored / game0.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals allowed / game1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Average possession56%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
4Shots on target / game3
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game12.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
4Shots on target3
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
22.7%Shot conversion4%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Possession56%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.39xG for1.47
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1.72xG against1.73
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Shooting quality

Madura United: Efficient finishingPSIM Yogyakarta: Balanced
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
Accuracy (shots on target)36%24%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.630.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Madura United is 500% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / game - Madura United · 0.5 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United
WW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.5Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.72BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
PSIM Yogyakarta
DL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Madura United is 400% better for: goals scored per game.

2.5 goals / game - Madura United · 0.5 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.5 goals / game - Madura United · 1 goals / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United scoring profile: very strong

Madura United scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while PSIM Yogyakarta keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).

PSIM Yogyakarta scoring profile: mixed

PSIM Yogyakarta scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Madura United keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).

5Goals scored (season)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals conceded (season)2
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
3Average goals per game1.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
5Goals scored (last 5)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
1Goals conceded (last 5)2
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
100%2 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%3 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%2 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%3 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%4 goals0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

65%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Scored in both halves0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%BTTS - last 550%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Madura United is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - Madura United · 1 pts / game - PSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing
PSIM Yogyakarta - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Average goals (1st half)0
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%No goal before half-time100%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per game (2nd half)0.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta
0%No goal after half-time50%
Madura UnitedPSIM Yogyakarta

Madura United - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PSIM Yogyakarta - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Madura United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.003.00
Goals scored / game0.52.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.5
Average goals per game0.52.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
PSIM Yogyakarta - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.50
Goals scored / game0.00.5
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.01.5
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Madura United
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

PSIM Yogyakarta
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Madura United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+2.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
156%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

PSIM Yogyakarta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
38%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 1).

Teams vs league

Madura UnitedLigaPSIM Yogyakarta
Average goals per game 3.002.90 1.50
Both teams scored 50%65% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%50% 0%
Clean sheets 50%18% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%85% 0%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.90
Average goals per game
65%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / game
1.30
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PSIM YogyakartaGoalNermin HaljetaAssist: Nolberto Ezequiel Vidal
  2. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardNolberto Ezequiel Vidal
  3. Madura UnitedYellow cardIlham Syah
  4. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardRio Hardiawan
  5. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardJosé Pedro Magalhães Valente
  6. PSIM YogyakartaSubstitutionOn: Mauro Andrés Caballero AguileraOff: Ondřej Rudzan
  7. PSIM YogyakartaYellow cardMauro Andrés Caballero Aguilera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Madura United's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against PSIM Yogyakarta. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The Liga 1 match finished Madura United 2:1 PSIM Yogyakarta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Madura United won 0, PSIM Yogyakarta won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

Madura United score 2.50 goals per game on average and PSIM Yogyakarta 0.50. The Liga 1 average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Madura United's matches and 50% of PSIM Yogyakarta's.

What form are Madura United and PSIM Yogyakarta in?

Over the last 5 games Madura United have a 2-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and PSIM Yogyakarta 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta?

The statistical background for Madura United vs PSIM Yogyakarta — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.