Mura vs Celje: match statistics
Mura vs Celje: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Mura played against Celje in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Venue: Mesti Stadion Fazanerija. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Mura has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Celje has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Mura scores 1.11 goals per game and allows 2.33. Celje scores 1.38 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Mura's games and 63% of Celje's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 50%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Celje has the higher season xG average, 1.63 to 1.53 per game. Mura takes 12.6 shots per game, while Celje takes 13.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Mura leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.56 goals per game after halftime. Celje leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.88 after halftime.
When the teams score
Mura's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Celje, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
PrvaLiga games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Celje are showing significantly better current form: they have collected 6 points from their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals, while Mura have managed just 1 point and only 2 goals. The hosts have lost 4 of their last 5 fixtures, and over the course of the season they have conceded an average of 2.5 goals at home while scoring just 0.75 per match. Away from home, Celje average 1.75 goals, have failed to score in none of their matches, and create higher-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.67 compared to Mura’s 1.35 at home. The visitors also record more shots on target per match, 4.25 to 3.25, while their conversion rate stands at 14%, compared to 6% for the hosts. Mura can rely on home advantage, but a run of three consecutive home defeats and a vulnerable defense point towards a Celje victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Mura is clearly the weakest link in the BTTS scenario: they have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4 per game, while both teams recorded BTTS in only 40% of their appearances during this period. The hosts have failed to score in 25% of their matches this season, while Celje have kept a clean sheet in 25% of their games, further increasing the risk that Mura will once again remain scoreless. Celje should have a good chance of scoring, as Mura have recently conceded an average of 2.2 goals, while the visitors are averaging 4.25 shots on target per match and 1.75 goals per game this season. Although Mura’s xG from their last 5 matches stands at a respectable 1.54, their very poor finishing has resulted in just 2 goals. Therefore, the more likely outcome is BTTS - No, meaning that at least one team will fail to score—not necessarily a 0:0 draw or a match in which neither team scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Celje averages 1.75 goals per match, while Mura have conceded as many as 2.2 goals across their last five games, significantly strengthening the case for at least two goals. The visitors have surpassed the 1.5-goal line in 100% of their matches this season, whereas Mura have kept a clean sheet in only 25% of their games. Celje’s attacking potential is also reflected in their average xG of 1.79 over the last five matches, compared with an xG against Mura of 1.38. However, Mura have been inefficient in front of goal, scoring just 0.4 goals per game in their last five appearances, which is why Over 2.5 does not offer the same level of value despite a projected total of 2.55 goals. The safest signal remains Over 1.5, supported by the hosts’ poor recent defensive record and Celje’s consistent scoring form.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Celje have a clear first-half advantage: they average 1.0 goals before the break, while Mura have failed to score in the first half and concede an average of 0.75 goals. The hosts were trailing at half-time in 3 of their 4 matches, whereas Celje have not been behind at the break on any occasion; the visitors were leading in 50% of their games. Recent form further favors Celje, as Mura have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring just 0.4 goals per game and conceding 2.2, while Celje have won 40% of their fixtures. The visitors also generate slightly higher xG, 1.67 compared with Mura’s 1.60, register 4.25 shots on target per match versus Mura’s 3.25, and have a conversion rate of 14% compared with 8%. Mura are relatively stronger after half-time, but their very poor opening performance and Celje’s advantage in attacking quality make a scenario in which the visitors lead at the break and secure the final victory the most likely outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Mura | Celje | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Celje is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Mura · 1.2 pts / game - Celje
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Celje is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
1.11 goals / game - Mura · 1.38 goals / game - Celje
Celje is 69% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - Mura · 1.38 goals / game - Celje
Mura scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while Celje keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).
Celje scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while Mura keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Mura
Over / Under - Celje
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mura is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / game - Mura · 1.13 pts / game - Celje
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Mura - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 22%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Celje - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Mura
Celje
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).
Teams vs league
| Mura | Liga | Celje | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.44 | 2.68 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 28% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 83% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Mura's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses against Celje. Games average 3.60 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Mura vs Celje?
The PrvaLiga match finished Mura 0:0 Celje. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Mura and Celje?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Mura won 1, Celje won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Mura vs Celje?
Mura score 1.11 goals per game on average and Celje 1.38. The PrvaLiga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Mura's matches and 63% of Celje's.
What form are Mura and Celje in?
Over the last 5 games Mura have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Celje 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Mura vs Celje?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Mura vs Celje: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


