Nations vs Hearts of Oak: match statistics
Nations vs Hearts of Oak: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nations played against Hearts of Oak in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Nations has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Hearts of Oak has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Nations scores 0.97 goals per game and allows 0.97. Hearts of Oak scores 0.71 and allows 0.39. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of Nations's games and 14% of Hearts of Oak's. The Over 2.5 rates are 34% and 18%, compared with league averages of 34% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nations has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.33 per game. Nations takes 8.7 shots per game, while Hearts of Oak takes 7.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Nations leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.41 goals per game after halftime. Hearts of Oak leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.39 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nations's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Hearts of Oak, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ghana Premier League games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 34% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nations are favorites due to a strong home record: 60% wins, averaging 1.4 goals scored per game and xG 1.82 while conceding just 0.53 goals. Hearts of Oak boast a very solid away defense (0.47 goals conceded and 67% clean sheets), but their away attack is weak — only 0.73 goals per game and failing to score in 53% of away matches. The gap in chance quality is clear: Nations register 16.36 shots and 5.55 on target at home, while Hearts average 7.77 shots and 2.77 on target away, with similar conversion rates (9% vs 8%). In the last 5 matches Nations scored 5 goals and recorded 2 wins (1.4 pts/game), whereas Hearts had 3 goals and 1 win (1.2 pts/game), which confirms the home advantage. Considering the superiority in chance creation (xG 1.82 vs 1.1) and better home efficiency, I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “No” scenario is more likely: both teams have very low seasonal BTTS rates — Nations 15% and Hearts of Oak 13% — well below the league average of 33%. Clean sheet percentages are 85% for the home side and 67% for the visitors versus a league figure of 84%, indicating that in many matches at least one team keeps a clean sheet. Seasonal goals averages are low (0.69 for hosts and 0.73 for visitors) with conceded averages of 0.31 and 0.47 respectively, which translates into a high proportion of matches with one or zero goals. Although the hosts’ xG is 1.58 versus 1.10 for the visitors and the hosts have BTTS in 40% of their last 5 games, the gap between xG 1.58 and the actual 0.69 goals shows poor conversion and a defensive approach. Therefore I recommend BTTS - No with an estimated probability of 80% vs 20% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model shows 1.58 xG for Nations and 1.10 xG for Hearts of Oak; after adjusting for opponent average xG (away teams concede 1.28 xG, home teams concede 0.94) this translates to approximately 1.43 expected goals for the home side and 1.02 for the away side, totaling 2.45 xG. However, observed season goal averages are significantly lower: Nations score 0.69 goals at home on average, Hearts of Oak 0.73 away, and clean sheet rates are 85% (home) and 67% (away). Weighting xG and actual averages yields expected goals of 0.92 for the hosts and 0.72 for the visitors, i.e. 1.64 goals in total. From a Poisson distribution this corresponds to roughly a 49% chance of Over 1.5, ~22% for Over 2.5 and ~8% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal from the data is Under 2.5, supported by season Over 2.5 rates of 15% (home) and 20% (away) and high clean sheet figures.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time a draw is the most likely outcome: the home side were level at the break in 54% of their matches and the visitors in 60%, yielding an average 57% chance of an HT draw. Seasonal clean sheet rates (85% for hosts and 67% for visitors) and the low percentages of games with both teams scoring (15% and 13%) indicate the draw is likely to persist to full-time — therefore HT/FT X/X is assigned a 34% probability. The hosts have higher xG (1.58) and more shots on target (4.0 vs 2.77), so scenarios where the home side execute a turnaround in the second half (HT/FT X/1 15% and 1/1 16%) are the second and third most significant signals. The low seasonal goals-per-game averages (hosts 0.69, visitors 0.73) and the fact that hosts lead at the break in 38% of matches (visitors in 27%) reduce the likelihood of visitor-led outcomes after half-time; combinations starting with ‘2’ total 17%. In summary, the strongest single pick is HT/FT X/X, with moderate support for HT/FT X/1 and HT/FT 1/1 as alternative scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nations | Hearts of Oak | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nations is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Nations · 1.2 pts / game - Hearts of Oak
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nations is 37% better for: goals scored per game.
0.97 goals / game - Nations · 0.71 goals / game - Hearts of Oak
Hearts of Oak is 149% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.97 goals / game - Nations · 0.39 goals / game - Hearts of Oak
Nations scores in 62% of games (18 of 29 meczów), while Hearts of Oak keeps a clean sheet in 75% (21 of 28 meczów).
Hearts of Oak scores in 50% of games (14 of 28 meczów), while Nations keeps a clean sheet in 34% (10 of 29 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nations
Over / Under - Hearts of Oak
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hearts of Oak is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / game - Nations · 1.54 pts / game - Hearts of Oak
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nations - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 34%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Hearts of Oak - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nations
Hearts of Oak
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Nations | Liga | Hearts of Oak | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.93 | 1.91 | ▼ 1.11 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 41% | 34% | ▼ 14% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 34% | 32% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 34% | 42% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 66% | 61% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | • 59% | 59% | ▼ 36% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Nations's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Hearts of Oak. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nations vs Hearts of Oak?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Nations 0:1 Hearts of Oak. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nations vs Hearts of Oak?
Nations score 0.97 goals per game on average and Hearts of Oak 0.71. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Nations's matches and 14% of Hearts of Oak's.
What form are Nations and Hearts of Oak in?
Over the last 5 games Nations have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Hearts of Oak 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nations vs Hearts of Oak?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nations vs Hearts of Oak: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


