Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of November 02, 2026

NEC vs UPDF: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

NEC vs UPDF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

NEC plays UPDF in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The game is scheduled for November 3, 2026.

Recent form

NEC has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. UPDF has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

NEC scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 0.56. UPDF scores 0.50 and allows 0.88. Games in this league average 2.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of NEC's games and 25% of UPDF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 25%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

NEC has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.14 per game. NEC takes 9.4 shots per game, while UPDF takes 5.8.

First-half and second-half trends

NEC leads at halftime in 56% of its games and scores 1.11 goals per game after halftime. UPDF leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

NEC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For UPDF, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uganda Premier League games average 2.19 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game0.5
NECUPDF
0.56Goals allowed / game0.88
NECUPDF
51%Average possession44%
NECUPDF
4.89Shots on target / game3
NECUPDF

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.44Shots per game5.75
NECUPDF
4.89Shots on target3
NECUPDF
21.2%Shot conversion8.7%
NECUPDF
51%Possession44%
NECUPDF
1.66xG for1.14
NECUPDF
1.39xG against1.24
NECUPDF

Shooting quality

NEC: Efficient finishingUPDF: Balanced
NECUPDF
Accuracy (shots on target)52%52%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

NEC is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - NEC · 1.2 pts / game - UPDF

NEC
DWLWW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-0
Last 5 at home
3-1-0
WWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UPDF
WWLLL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

NEC is 300% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - NEC · 0.5 goals / game - UPDF

NEC is 57% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.56 goals / game - NEC · 0.88 goals / game - UPDF

NEC scoring profile: strong

NEC scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 games), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 games).

UPDF scoring profile: more difficult

UPDF scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 games), while NEC keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 games).

18Goals scored (season)4
NECUPDF
5Goals conceded (season)7
NECUPDF
2.56Average goals per game1.38
NECUPDF
9Goals scored (last 5)3
NECUPDF
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
NECUPDF

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal38%
NECUPDF
56%2 goals13%
NECUPDF
33%3 goals0%
NECUPDF
22%4 goals0%
NECUPDF

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal63%
NECUPDF
11%2 goals25%
NECUPDF
0%3 goals0%
NECUPDF
0%4 goals0%
NECUPDF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time13%
NECUPDF
0%BTTS in both halves0%
NECUPDF
44%Scored in both halves0%
NECUPDF

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
NECUPDF
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NECUPDF
40%BTTS - last 520%
NECUPDF

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
NECUPDF
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
NECUPDF
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
NECUPDF

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
NECUPDF
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
NECUPDF
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
NECUPDF

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

NEC is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2 pts / game - NEC · 1.38 pts / game - UPDF

NEC - half-time state
56% leading33% draw11% trailing
UPDF - half-time state
25% leading63% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2Points per game (1st half)1.38
NECUPDF
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.5
NECUPDF
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
NECUPDF
1.22Average goals (1st half)0.75
NECUPDF
67%Clean sheet before half-time75%
NECUPDF
44%No goal before half-time63%
NECUPDF

After half-time (2nd half)

2.11Points per game (2nd half)0.5
NECUPDF
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)0
NECUPDF
0.22Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
NECUPDF
1.33Average goals (2nd half)0.63
NECUPDF
78%Clean sheet after half-time50%
NECUPDF
33%No goal after half-time100%
NECUPDF

NEC - second-half results

56% W44% D0% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at halftime in 56% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

UPDF - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

NEC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.80
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
UPDF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.40
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

NEC
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
1
0
16-30
5
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.97
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 0.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-75%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

NEC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.83
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
174%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
54%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.64
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

NECLigaUPDF
Average goals per game▲ 2.562.19▼ 1.38
Both teams scored▲ 44%41%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 44%41%▼ 25%
Clean sheets▲ 56%37%• 38%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%61%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time• 67%68%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.19
Average goals per game
41%
Both teams scored
41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / game
1.04
Away goals / game
+11%
Home attack advantage
+10%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from NEC's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against UPDF. Games average 0.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

When do NEC and UPDF play?

NEC face UPDF on November 3, 2026 in Uganda Premier League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between NEC and UPDF?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches NEC won 1, UPDF won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 0.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before NEC vs UPDF?

NEC score 2.00 goals per game on average and UPDF 0.50. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 44% of NEC's matches and 25% of UPDF's.

What form are NEC and UPDF in?

Over the last 5 games NEC have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and UPDF 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for NEC vs UPDF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.