Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics
Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Pacific FC played against Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Westhills Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Pacific FC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Cavalry FC has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Pacific FC scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 2.10. Cavalry FC scores 2.00 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Pacific FC's games and 50% of Cavalry FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 50%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cavalry FC has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.41 per game. Pacific FC takes 11.9 shots per game, while Cavalry FC takes 14.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Pacific FC leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Cavalry FC leads at halftime in 35% and scores 1.35 after halftime.
When the teams score
Pacific FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Cavalry FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Canadian Premier League games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavalry FC sit top of the table, having won 14 of their 20 matches this season, and remain unbeaten in their last five games, with a record of 4 wins and 1 draw. Pacific FC have just 1 win in the entire competition, have lost 70% of their home matches, and have failed to keep a single clean sheet. The hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals per home game, while Cavalry allow opponents just 0.6 goals away from home and keep a clean sheet in 40% of their away fixtures. The visitors are also more clinical, scoring 1.7 goals per away game with a 14% shot conversion rate, compared with Pacific’s 1.3 goals and 10% conversion rate. Although Pacific produce a slightly higher average xG at home, 1.62 compared with 1.35, their extremely vulnerable defense and Cavalry’s significantly stronger recent form clearly point towards a victory for the league leaders.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The case for goals from both sides is strengthened by current form: BTTS has landed in 60% of Pacific FC’s last five matches and in as many as 80% of Cavalry FC’s games. During this period, Pacific conceded an average of 1.4 goals per match, while their average xG against stood at 1.39, giving an in-form Cavalry, who have recently scored 2.0 goals per game, a solid foundation to find the net. The hosts have not recorded a single scoreless game this season, and their attacking potential is confirmed by an average of 2.3 goals, an xG of 1.90, and 6.3 shots on target per match. The main risk to the pick is Cavalry’s solid defense, which concedes just 0.6 goals on average and keeps a clean sheet in 40% of matches. However, Pacific create enough chances to make the BTTS scenario slightly more likely than at least one team failing to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Pacific FC create chances worth an average of 1.90 xG at home and register 17.0 shots per match, while Cavalry FC record 1.35 xG in attack. Both teams have very solid defenses, conceding an average of 0.6 goals each; however, in their last five matches, Pacific conceded 1.4 goals per game, while Cavalry scored as many as 2.0. The Over 1.5 line has landed in 90% of Pacific FC matches and 60% of Cavalry FC matches, while at least one goal was scored in 100% and 90% of their games, respectively. The projected 2.60 goals and the visitors’ strong current attacking form support Over 1.5, although the high percentage of matches finishing below 3.5 goals—70% and 80%—limits the potential for a very high-scoring game.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams have been level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, while each has averaged just 0.8 goals before the break. Pacific retains the home advantage in the season data, with an average xG of 1.90 compared with Cavalry’s 1.35, but its current form has clearly declined: it has recently scored 1.2 goals and conceded 1.4 per match. Cavalry has won 4 of its last 5 matches, scoring 2.0 goals per game during this period and allowing opponents just 0.8. After the break, the visitors have recently averaged 1.6 goals, while Pacific has conceded 1.2 in second halves, reinforcing the HT/FT X/2 scenario—a turnaround from a half-time draw to a Cavalry win at the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Pacific FC | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cavalry FC is 117% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Pacific FC · 2.6 pts / game - Cavalry FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 60% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Pacific FC · 2 goals / game - Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC is 250% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.1 goals / game - Pacific FC · 0.6 goals / game - Cavalry FC
Pacific FC scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 games).
Cavalry FC scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 games), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Pacific FC
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cavalry FC is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Pacific FC · 1.65 pts / game - Cavalry FC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Pacific FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 5%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Pacific FC | Liga | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.35 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.60 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 56% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 20% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 70% | 63% | ▼ 45% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 83% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Pacific FC's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 4 losses against Cavalry FC. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Pacific FC 0:1 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Pacific FC and Cavalry FC?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Pacific FC won 1, Cavalry FC won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?
Pacific FC score 1.25 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 2.00. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Pacific FC's matches and 50% of Cavalry FC's.
What form are Pacific FC and Cavalry FC in?
Over the last 5 games Pacific FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cavalry FC 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?
The statistical background for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


