Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueWesthills StadiumData current as of September 19, 2026

Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics

Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC

Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Pacific FC played against Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The game was played on September 13, 2026. Venue: Westhills Stadium. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Pacific FC has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Cavalry FC has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Pacific FC scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 2.10. Cavalry FC scores 2.00 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of Pacific FC's games and 50% of Cavalry FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 65% and 50%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Cavalry FC has the higher season xG average, 1.64 to 1.41 per game. Pacific FC takes 11.9 shots per game, while Cavalry FC takes 14.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Pacific FC leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Cavalry FC leads at halftime in 35% and scores 1.35 after halftime.

When the teams score

Pacific FC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). For Cavalry FC, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Canadian Premier League games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Cavalry FC sit top of the table, having won 14 of their 20 matches this season, and remain unbeaten in their last five games, with a record of 4 wins and 1 draw. Pacific FC have just 1 win in the entire competition, have lost 70% of their home matches, and have failed to keep a single clean sheet. The hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals per home game, while Cavalry allow opponents just 0.6 goals away from home and keep a clean sheet in 40% of their away fixtures. The visitors are also more clinical, scoring 1.7 goals per away game with a 14% shot conversion rate, compared with Pacific’s 1.3 goals and 10% conversion rate. Although Pacific produce a slightly higher average xG at home, 1.62 compared with 1.35, their extremely vulnerable defense and Cavalry’s significantly stronger recent form clearly point towards a victory for the league leaders.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for goals from both sides is strengthened by current form: BTTS has landed in 60% of Pacific FC’s last five matches and in as many as 80% of Cavalry FC’s games. During this period, Pacific conceded an average of 1.4 goals per match, while their average xG against stood at 1.39, giving an in-form Cavalry, who have recently scored 2.0 goals per game, a solid foundation to find the net. The hosts have not recorded a single scoreless game this season, and their attacking potential is confirmed by an average of 2.3 goals, an xG of 1.90, and 6.3 shots on target per match. The main risk to the pick is Cavalry’s solid defense, which concedes just 0.6 goals on average and keeps a clean sheet in 40% of matches. However, Pacific create enough chances to make the BTTS scenario slightly more likely than at least one team failing to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Pacific FC create chances worth an average of 1.90 xG at home and register 17.0 shots per match, while Cavalry FC record 1.35 xG in attack. Both teams have very solid defenses, conceding an average of 0.6 goals each; however, in their last five matches, Pacific conceded 1.4 goals per game, while Cavalry scored as many as 2.0. The Over 1.5 line has landed in 90% of Pacific FC matches and 60% of Cavalry FC matches, while at least one goal was scored in 100% and 90% of their games, respectively. The projected 2.60 goals and the visitors’ strong current attacking form support Over 1.5, although the high percentage of matches finishing below 3.5 goals—70% and 80%—limits the potential for a very high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as both teams have been level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches, while each has averaged just 0.8 goals before the break. Pacific retains the home advantage in the season data, with an average xG of 1.90 compared with Cavalry’s 1.35, but its current form has clearly declined: it has recently scored 1.2 goals and conceded 1.4 per match. Cavalry has won 4 of its last 5 matches, scoring 2.0 goals per game during this period and allowing opponents just 0.8. After the break, the visitors have recently averaged 1.6 goals, while Pacific has conceded 1.2 in second halves, reinforcing the HT/FT X/2 scenario—a turnaround from a half-time draw to a Cavalry win at the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Pacific FCCavalry FC
10Shots19
Pacific FCCavalry FC
2Shots on target3
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.98xG1.99
Pacific FCCavalry FC
4Corners7
Pacific FCCavalry FC
28Dangerous attacks80
Pacific FCCavalry FC
16Fouls15
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1Cards1
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.25Goals scored / game2
Pacific FCCavalry FC
2.1Goals allowed / game0.6
Pacific FCCavalry FC
50%Average possession49%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
4.1Shots on target / game5.55
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.9Shots per game14.4
Pacific FCCavalry FC
4.1Shots on target5.55
Pacific FCCavalry FC
10.5%Shot conversion13.9%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
50%Possession49%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.41xG for1.64
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.59xG against1.16
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Shooting quality

Pacific FC: BalancedCavalry FC: Attacking
Pacific FCCavalry FC
Accuracy (shots on target)34%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Cavalry FC is 117% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Pacific FC · 2.6 pts / game - Cavalry FC

Pacific FC
DLWDD
Season result split
5% W35% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-7-12
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Cavalry FC
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
70% W20% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-4-2
2.30 pts / game · goal difference +28
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cavalry FC is 60% better for: goals scored per game.

1.25 goals / game - Pacific FC · 2 goals / game - Cavalry FC

Cavalry FC is 250% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.1 goals / game - Pacific FC · 0.6 goals / game - Cavalry FC

Pacific FC scoring profile: strong

Pacific FC scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 games).

Cavalry FC scoring profile: very strong

Cavalry FC scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 games), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 games).

25Goals scored (season)40
Pacific FCCavalry FC
42Goals conceded (season)12
Pacific FCCavalry FC
3.35Average goals per game2.6
Pacific FCCavalry FC
8Goals scored (last 5)10
Pacific FCCavalry FC
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
Pacific FCCavalry FC

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal85%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
35%2 goals60%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
10%3 goals35%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
5%4 goals10%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal60%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
70%2 goals0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
35%3 goals0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
5%4 goals0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time10%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
10%BTTS in both halves0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
25%Scored in both halves30%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
60%BTTS - last 580%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time45%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
65%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavalry FC is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - Pacific FC · 1.65 pts / game - Cavalry FC

Pacific FC - half-time state
35% leading35% draw30% trailing
Cavalry FC - half-time state
35% leading60% draw5% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)1.65
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.15
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.85Average goals (1st half)0.8
Pacific FCCavalry FC
65%Clean sheet before half-time85%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
55%No goal before half-time60%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.45Points per game (2nd half)1.9
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.75Goals scored (2nd half)1.35
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Pacific FCCavalry FC
2.35Average goals (2nd half)1.8
Pacific FCCavalry FC
10%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
50%No goal after half-time25%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Pacific FC - second-half results

5% W30% D65% L
28
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding14%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 5%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.2

Allows 1.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Cavalry FC - second-half results

50% W40% D10% L
33
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 70%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pacific FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.21.6
Average goals per game0.82.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Cavalry FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.60
Goals scored / game0.41.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Pacific FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
5
31-45
6
12
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

Cavalry FC
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
1
31-45
8
2
46-60
9
3
61-75
10
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Pacific FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
156%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.70
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Cavalry FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.92
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
37%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Pacific FCLigaCavalry FC
Average goals per game 3.352.99 2.60
Both teams scored 75%63% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%56% 50%
Clean sheets 5%20% 40%
Goal before half-time 70%63% 45%
Goal after half-time 90%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.64
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
32%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Cavalry FCYellow cardEryk Kobza
  2. Pacific FCYellow cardRonan Kratt
  3. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Lukas BrowningOff: Roshawn Kadeem Delahaye Juhmi
  4. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Robert Owen AntoniukOff: Caniggia Ginola Elva
  5. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Mattias ValesOff: Marco Bustos
  6. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Goteh NtigneeOff: Adam Pearlman
  7. Cavalry FCSubstitutionOn: Hassan AyariOff: Nikolas Myroniuk
  8. Cavalry FCGoalDaan KlompAssist: Tobias Warschewski
  9. Pacific FCSubstitutionOn: Tristan MarshallOff: Sami Keshavarz

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Pacific FC's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 4 losses against Cavalry FC. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Cavalry FC
3 : 0
Pacific FC
Pacific FC
1 : 2
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
3 : 3
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
1 : 0
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 0
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
4 : 0
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Pacific FC 0:1 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pacific FC and Cavalry FC?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Pacific FC won 1, Cavalry FC won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

Pacific FC score 1.25 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 2.00. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Pacific FC's matches and 50% of Cavalry FC's.

What form are Pacific FC and Cavalry FC in?

Over the last 5 games Pacific FC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Cavalry FC 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

The statistical background for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.