Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueData current as of August 31, 2026

Supra du Québec vs Forge FC: match statistics

Supra du Québec crest
Supra du Québec
1 : 0half-time 1:0
Forge FC crest
Forge FC

Supra du Québec vs Forge FC: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Supra du Québec played against Forge FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The game was played on August 28, 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Supra du Québec has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Forge FC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Supra du Québec scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 1.83. Forge FC scores 1.61 and allows 0.72. Games in this league average 2.96 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 83% of Supra du Québec's games and 44% of Forge FC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 44%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Forge FC has the higher season xG average, 1.67 to 1.58 per game. Supra du Québec takes 14.9 shots per game, while Forge FC takes 14.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Supra du Québec leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. Forge FC leads at halftime in 28% and scores 1.11 after halftime.

When the teams score

Supra du Québec's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). For Forge FC, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Canadian Premier League games average 2.96 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Forge FC top the table with 13 wins from 18 matches, while Supra du Québec have won just 5 games and sit in 6th place. The visitors are clearly more effective away from home, averaging 1.78 goals from an xG of 1.78, compared with the hosts’ 1.11 goals despite their xG of 1.64. Forge’s defense concedes just 0.89 goals per away game and keeps a clean sheet in 33% of matches, while Supra have failed to keep a single clean sheet at home and concede an average of 1.67 goals. The hosts have failed to win any of their last five matches, recording 3 draws and 2 defeats, whereas Forge have collected 7 points during that period. The visitors’ defensive advantage, superior shots on target (5.33 versus 4.33), and better finishing efficiency (12% versus 7%) point to a Forge victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for goals at both ends is strengthened by Supra du Québec’s current form: in their last 5 matches, the team averaged 1.6 goals scored, conceded 2.0, and BTTS landed in all 5 games. Forge FC should find a way to score, as they average 1.78 goals per game this season, generate 1.78 xG, and register 5.33 shots on target per match, while the hosts have conceded 10 goals in their last five league fixtures. The hosts also have genuine attacking arguments against Forge’s defense: their average xG is 1.56, while opponents have kept a clean sheet in only 33% of matches and allow an average of 1.26 xG. Supra’s season profile is more cautious, with BTTS occurring in only 22% of their matches, but their current defensive numbers clearly weaken that argument. With the league BTTS average standing at 64%, the more likely scenario is that both teams score at least one goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model expects 2.72 goals, as the hosts’ average xG stands at 1.56, while Forge creates chances worth an average of 1.78 xG, whereas Supra concedes only 0.85 xG per match. The hosts’ defense is particularly solid: they concede an average of 0.56 goals and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches. Historically, Supra’s matches have finished below 3.5 goals in 78% of cases, while Forge’s rate is also high at 67%. Supra’s last five matches have been more open, averaging 3.6 goals, with 60% of games going Over 2.5, but this does not change the fact that the four-goal threshold remains high. The strongest edge therefore lies with Under 3.5 goals, supported by the combination of the hosts’ low average goals conceded and both teams’ seasonal trends.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Forge FC win at full-time, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 60% of their last five matches. Forge, however, are in clearly better current form: they average 1.4 points per match across their last five fixtures, while Supra have not won any of them and average just 0.6 points. The visitors have also created more over the course of the season, with an average xG of 1.78 compared with the hosts’ 1.56, while their average of 5.33 shots on target exceeds Supra’s 4.56. After the break, Forge score an average of 1.11 goals, whereas the hosts have conceded as many as 1.4 goals per match in the second half across their last five games. In addition, Forge have not been trailing at half-time in any match this season, while Supra have led at the break in only 11% of their fixtures, reinforcing the scenario of a cautious start followed by the visitors gaining the upper hand late on.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Supra du QuébecForge FC
8Shots7
Supra du QuébecForge FC
4Shots on target1
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0.97xG1.06
Supra du QuébecForge FC
2Corners6
Supra du QuébecForge FC
23Dangerous attacks75
Supra du QuébecForge FC
16Fouls13
Supra du QuébecForge FC
4Cards3
Supra du QuébecForge FC

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Supra du QuébecForge FC
1.44Goals scored / game1.61
Supra du QuébecForge FC
1.83Goals allowed / game0.72
Supra du QuébecForge FC
53%Average possession46%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
4.94Shots on target / game4.94
Supra du QuébecForge FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.89Shots per game14.39
Supra du QuébecForge FC
4.94Shots on target4.94
Supra du QuébecForge FC
9.7%Shot conversion11.2%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
53%Possession46%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
1.58xG for1.67
Supra du QuébecForge FC
1.34xG against1.04
Supra du QuébecForge FC

Shooting quality

Supra du Québec: AttackingForge FC: Attacking
Supra du QuébecForge FC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Forge FC is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Supra du Québec · 1.4 pts / game - Forge FC

Supra du Québec
WDLLD
Season result split
28% W22% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-9
1.06 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Forge FC
DLLWW
Season result split
72% W11% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-2-3
2.28 pts / game · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Forge FC is 12% better for: goals scored per game.

1.44 goals / game - Supra du Québec · 1.61 goals / game - Forge FC

Forge FC is 154% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.83 goals / game - Supra du Québec · 0.72 goals / game - Forge FC

Supra du Québec scoring profile: strong

Supra du Québec scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 meczów), while Forge FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 meczów).

Forge FC scoring profile: very strong

Forge FC scores in 83% of games (15 of 18 meczów), while Supra du Québec keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 18 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)29
Supra du QuébecForge FC
33Goals conceded (season)13
Supra du QuébecForge FC
3.28Average goals per game2.33
Supra du QuébecForge FC
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Supra du QuébecForge FC
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Supra du QuébecForge FC

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
39%2 goals44%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
22%3 goals28%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0%4 goals6%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
44%2 goals22%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
17%3 goals0%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
11%4 goals0%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

83%
Supra du Québec - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 18 meczów
64%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time11%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
11%Scored in both halves33%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
100%BTTS - last 540%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Forge FC is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / game - Supra du Québec · 1.44 pts / game - Forge FC

Supra du Québec - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing
Forge FC - half-time state
28% leading61% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per game (1st half)1.44
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Supra du QuébecForge FC
1.06Average goals (1st half)0.83
Supra du QuébecForge FC
50%Clean sheet before half-time78%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
78%No goal before half-time61%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)2.22
Supra du QuébecForge FC
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)1.11
Supra du QuébecForge FC
1.11Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
Supra du QuébecForge FC
2.06Average goals (2nd half)1.5
Supra du QuébecForge FC
28%Clean sheet after half-time72%
Supra du QuébecForge FC
33%No goal after half-time22%
Supra du QuébecForge FC

Supra du Québec - second-half results

28% W33% R39% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding255%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Forge FC - second-half results

67% W22% R11% P
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding257%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 72%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Supra du Québec - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Forge FC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Supra du Québec
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
4
4
31-45
5
4
46-60
6
4
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Forge FC
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
7
0
16-30
2
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
8
2
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Supra du Québec

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.49
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Forge FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
45%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.88
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Supra du QuébecLigaForge FC
Average goals per game 3.282.96 2.33
Both teams scored 83%64% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%56% 44%
Clean sheets 0%19% 50%
Goal before half-time 56%63% 50%
Goal after half-time 94%85% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per game
64%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / game
1.35
Away goals / game
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Supra du QuébecYellow cardLoïc Adrien Kwemi
  2. Supra du QuébecYellow cardCharles Auguste
  3. Forge FCYellow cardAntoine Batisse
  4. Supra du QuébecGoalLoïc Adrien Kwemi
  5. Supra du QuébecSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim CondéOff: Riad Bey
  6. Forge FCSubstitutionOn: Anthony AromatarioOff: Antoine Batisse
  7. Supra du QuébecYellow cardAboubacar Sissoko
  8. Forge FCSubstitutionOn: Noah JensenOff: Ben Paton
  9. Supra du QuébecSubstitutionOn: Zachary FernandezOff: Sean Rea
  10. Supra du QuébecYellow cardZachary Fernandez
  11. Forge FCYellow cardMaxime Filion

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Supra du Québec's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Forge FC. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Supra du Québec vs Forge FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Supra du Québec 1:0 Forge FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Supra du Québec and Forge FC?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Supra du Québec won 0, Forge FC won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Supra du Québec vs Forge FC?

Supra du Québec score 1.44 goals per game on average and Forge FC 1.61. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Supra du Québec's matches and 44% of Forge FC's.

What form are Supra du Québec and Forge FC in?

Over the last 5 games Supra du Québec have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Forge FC 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Supra du Québec vs Forge FC?

The statistical background for Supra du Québec vs Forge FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.