Thun vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Thun vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Thun played against Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Stockhorn Arena. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Thun has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Grasshopper has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Thun scores 1.83 goals per game and allows 2.83. Grasshopper scores 1.50 and allows 2.33. Games in this league average 3.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Thun's games and 83% of Grasshopper's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 67%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 77% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Grasshopper has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.59 per game. Thun takes 14.7 shots per game, while Grasshopper takes 15.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Thun leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 1.33 goals per game after halftime. Grasshopper leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Thun's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). For Grasshopper, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.82 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 77% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Grasshopper come into the match in slightly better recent form: they have collected 7 points and scored 12 goals in their last five games, while Thun have earned 5 points and conceded as many as 15 goals. The hosts have a particularly serious problem at home, where they have not won a single match, failed to score, and concede an average of 3 goals per game. The visitors are also defensively weak away from home, averaging 2.67 goals conceded and keeping no clean sheets, but they at least score an average of 1.33 goals per match and have picked up points in one-third of their away games. The quality of chances slightly favors Grasshopper defensively, as their average xG of goals conceded stands at 1.52 compared with Thun’s 1.85, while the hosts’ overall trend points to declining finishing efficiency and defensive solidity. An open, goal-filled match is expected, but the visitors have the better chance of ending their away winless run.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is very clear: BTTS occurred in 67% of Thun’s matches and in all of Grasshopper’s games, compared with a league average of 74%. Neither team has recorded a single match without scoring, while Grasshopper have also failed to keep a clean sheet in every game. Thun average 1.67 goals at home, whereas Grasshopper concede as many as 2.67 goals away, strongly supporting a home goal. The visitors have averaged 2.4 goals scored over their last 5 matches, while Thun have conceded 3.0 during the same period, making a Grasshopper goal highly likely as well. Their attacking potential is confirmed by xG: 1.95 for Thun at home and 1.87 for Grasshopper across their last five appearances, making BTTS - Yes the most likely scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams play in high-scoring games: Thun average 1.67 goals scored and 2.00 conceded, while Grasshopper score 1.33 and allow opponents to score 2.67 goals. In their last five matches, Grasshopper have improved their attacking efficiency to 2.4 goals per game, whereas Thun have conceded as many as 15 goals, or 3.0 per match. Their creative potential also points towards goals, with average xG standing at 1.95 for the hosts and 1.43 for the visitors, while the home side average 6.33 shots on target. At least two goals have been scored in 100% of both teams' matches so far, making Over 1.5 by far the strongest signal, although higher lines also have clear supporting evidence.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Thun leading at the break and the home side securing the win, as Thun were ahead at half-time in 2 of their 3 home matches, while Grasshopper have not led at the interval in any game. The hosts have yet to concede before half-time at home, whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.33 goals in this phase. Thun also create more chances: their average xG is 1.95 compared with Grasshopper’s 1.43, while shots on target stand at 6.33 versus 3.00. Grasshopper have lost 67% of their away matches and concede an average of 2.67 goals on the road, reinforcing the prospect of the home side maintaining their lead. However, the visitors’ stronger recent form, with 2.4 goals scored per match across their last five games, increases the likelihood of a turnaround after half-time, particularly in the 1/2 and X/2 scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Thun | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Thun is 22% better for: goals scored per game.
1.83 goals / game - Thun · 1.5 goals / game - Grasshopper
Grasshopper is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.83 goals / game - Thun · 2.33 goals / game - Grasshopper
Thun scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
Grasshopper scores in 100% of games (6 of 6 games), while Thun keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Thun
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grasshopper is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Thun · 1.5 pts / game - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Thun - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Thun
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Thun | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.67 | 3.82 | • 3.83 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 67% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 17% | 14% | ▲ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 92% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Thun's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Grasshopper. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Thun vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Thun 0:1 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Thun and Grasshopper?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Thun won 2, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Thun vs Grasshopper?
Thun score 1.83 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.50. The Super League average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Thun's matches and 83% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Thun and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Thun have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Grasshopper 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thun vs Grasshopper?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thun vs Grasshopper: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.