Lithuania - A LygaData current as of September 20, 2026

TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys: match statistics

TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

TransINVEST Vilnius played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on August 10, 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

TransINVEST Vilnius has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Panevėžys has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.21. Panevėžys scores 0.95 and allows 1.77. Games in this league average 2.67 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of TransINVEST Vilnius's games and 59% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 59%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

TransINVEST Vilnius has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.25 per game. TransINVEST Vilnius takes 11.8 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

TransINVEST Vilnius leads at halftime in 46% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.36 after halftime.

When the teams score

TransINVEST Vilnius's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

A Lyga games average 2.67 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

TransINVEST Vilnius sit 1st in the home table, while Panevėžys are 8th in the away standings. At home, the hosts average 1.27 goals scored and concede just 1.00, whereas the visitors score 0.70 goals away from home and allow as many as 2.60. The difference in the quality of chances created is also reflected in the xG figures: TransINVEST record 1.34 xG at home while conceding 1.16 xG, whereas Panevėžys have 1.13 xG away from home and allow 1.73. The visitors have lost 80% of their away matches, failed to score in 50% of them and kept a clean sheet in only 10%, which clearly strengthens the case for the hosts. Panevėžys are without a win in their last five matches, recording four draws and one defeat, while TransINVEST have won 2 of their last 5 and averaged more points over that period: 1.4 compared with 0.8.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

TransINVEST has recorded BTTS - Yes in 75% of its matches this season, well above the league average of 50%, while the figure stood at 60% across its last five games. Panevėžys has only a 40% BTTS rate for the season overall, but four of its last five matches featured goals from both sides, equating to 80%. The hosts average 1.17 goals scored, while the visitors concede as many as 2.60, and Panevėžys has kept a clean sheet in only 10% of its matches. The visitors’ chances of scoring are supported by an xG of 1.13 for the season and 1.24 across their last five matches, with TransINVEST posting an xG against of 1.58. Although Panevėžys averages only 0.70 goals scored, the defensive struggles of both teams in their recent run, with each conceding 1.4 goals per match, slightly tip the prediction towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

TransINVEST average 1.17 goals at home, while Panevėžys concede as many as 2.60 goals per away match, clearly increasing the hosts’ attacking potential. The visitors score only 0.70 goals away from home, but the hosts concede an average of 1.08 goals, so their projected total still stands at around 1.00 goal. At least two goals were scored in 75% of TransINVEST matches and 80% of Panevėžys matches, while neither team boasts a high clean-sheet rate: 17% and 10%, respectively. Each team’s last five matches produced an average of 1.4 goals conceded per game, supporting a scenario with at least two goals. Over 1.5 is the strongest pick, as it combines both teams’ consistent historical metrics with a projected total of 2.55 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

TransINVEST Vilnius held the lead at the break in 6 of 12 matches, or 50% of the time, while Panevėžys were behind at half-time in 60% of their games and conceded an average of 1.4 goals in the first half. The hosts have a clearly stronger overall season record: they score an average of 1.17 goals, compared with just 0.70 for their opponents, while Panevėžys allow as many as 2.60 goals per match. The quality of chances also favors TransINVEST, who generate an xG of 1.36 compared with the visitors’ 1.13 and average 4.25 shots on target against Panevėžys’ 3.10. After the break, the visitors remain inefficient, scoring an average of 0.20 goals and losing the second half in 60% of matches, so a home lead at half-time should most often be maintained. The last five matches increase the risk of a half-time draw, as TransINVEST were level after 45 minutes in 60% of those appearances; however, Panevėžys’ 0 wins during this period still strengthens the 1/1 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
13Shots9
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
4Shots on target4
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.63xG1.28
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
6Corners1
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
75Dangerous attacks61
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
13Fouls13
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1Cards2
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.67Goals scored / game0.95
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.21Goals allowed / game1.77
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
48%Average possession47%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
4.04Shots on target / game3.73
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.75Shots per game10.91
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
4.04Shots on target3.73
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
14.2%Shot conversion8.8%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
48%Possession47%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.39xG for1.25
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.19xG against1.64
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Shooting quality

TransINVEST Vilnius: Efficient finishingPanevėžys: Balanced
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.410.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1 pts / game - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius
DLLWW
Season result split
50% W21% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-7
1.71 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.93Opponent xG: 1.03BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Panevėžys
WLDLD
Season result split
27% W23% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-5-11
1.05 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-8
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.64BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 76% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 0.95 goals / game - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.21 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.77 goals / game - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius scoring profile: very strong

TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 88% of games (21 of 24 games), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 games).

Panevėžys scoring profile: strong

Panevėžys scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 games), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 games).

40Goals scored (season)21
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
29Goals conceded (season)39
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
2.88Average goals per game2.73
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
5Goals scored (last 5)6
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal68%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
50%2 goals23%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
17%3 goals5%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
8%4 goals0%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal86%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
38%2 goals45%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
17%3 goals32%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0%4 goals14%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
TransINVEST Vilnius - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 24 games
50%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time23%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
4%BTTS in both halves9%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
38%Scored in both halves9%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
60%BTTS - last 580%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time77%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

TransINVEST Vilnius is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.32 pts / game - Panevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius - half-time state
46% leading38% draw17% trailing
Panevėžys - half-time state
36% leading23% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per game (1st half)1.32
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.83Goals scored (1st half)0.59
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.46Goals conceded (1st half)0.91
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.5
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
63%Clean sheet before half-time41%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
33%No goal before half-time55%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per game (2nd half)0.91
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.23
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
46%Clean sheet after half-time41%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys
42%No goal after half-time68%
TransINVEST VilniusPanevėžys

TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results

29% W33% D38% L
42
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at halftime in 46% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Panevėžys - second-half results

18% W36% D45% L
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 27%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

TransINVEST Vilnius - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Panevėžys - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.40
Goals scored / game0.80.4
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.41.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

TransINVEST Vilnius
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
7
4
46-60
9
6
61-75
4
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Panevėžys
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
5
46-60
0
5
61-75
5
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

TransINVEST Vilnius

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
116%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Panevėžys

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).

Teams vs league

TransINVEST VilniusLigaPanevėžys
Average goals per game 2.882.67 2.73
Both teams scored 63%50% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%55% 59%
Clean sheets 33%31% 14%
Goal before half-time 79%70% 82%
Goal after half-time 83%77% 77%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / game
1.23
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PanevėžysYellow cardMiano van den Bos
  2. PanevėžysSubstitutionOn: Oleksandr KurtsevOff: Nauris Petkevičius
  3. TransINVEST VilniusSubstitutionOn: Amankwaa AkuruguOff: Dominykas Barauskas
  4. TransINVEST VilniusSubstitutionOn: Nana Dwomoh Akosah-BempahOff: Stefan Milošević
  5. PanevėžysYellow cardVytautas Gediminas Černiauskas

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from TransINVEST Vilnius's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Panevėžys. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys?

The A Lyga match finished TransINVEST Vilnius 0:2 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between TransINVEST Vilnius and Panevėžys?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches TransINVEST Vilnius won 1, Panevėžys won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys?

TransINVEST Vilnius score 1.67 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.95. The A Lyga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 63% of TransINVEST Vilnius's matches and 59% of Panevėžys's.

What form are TransINVEST Vilnius and Panevėžys in?

Over the last 5 games TransINVEST Vilnius have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Panevėžys 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Panevėžys: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.