Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of October 16, 2026

Tukums vs Riga: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Riga crest
Riga

Tukums vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums played against Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Tukums has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Riga has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums scores 1.42 goals per game and allows 1.97. Riga scores 2.77 and allows 0.97. Games in this league average 2.84 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 81% of Tukums's games and 58% of Riga's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 77%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Riga has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.40 per game. Tukums takes 11.6 shots per game, while Riga takes 16.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.74 goals per game after halftime. Riga leads at halftime in 65% and scores 1.39 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Riga, it is minutes 76-90+ (20 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.84 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 5 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Riga sit 2nd and have won 22 of their 31 matches, while ninth-placed Tukums have managed just 5 wins and suffered 17 defeats. The visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, winning 3 of them, while the hosts have won once and conceded 10 goals over the same period. Away from home, Riga average 2.67 goals per match from 1.90 xG, whereas Tukums score 1.75 goals at home from 1.47 xG. The visitors also hold the defensive edge: they concede an average of 1.07 goals away and keep a clean sheet in 40% of matches, while the hosts concede 1.50 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in just 6% of games. Although Tukums can score in front of their own fans, Riga’s away scoring record and 67% win rate on the road clearly point to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has occurred in 56% of Tukums’ matches and 60% of Riga’s, with the figure standing at 60% across the teams’ last five games. The attacking xG averages support goals at both ends: 2.08 for the hosts and 1.90 for the visitors, with each side averaging more than 6 shots on target per match. The main concern is Tukums’ scoring form: they have averaged just 0.8 goals over their last five matches, while Riga have conceded 1.0 per game. Even so, the hosts have failed to score in none of the matches in the seasonal data, while Riga have drawn a blank in 7% of their games, making it slightly more likely that both teams will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least 2 goals were scored in 94% of Tukums' matches and 80% of Riga's, making Over 1.5 the strongest pick based on the data. Both teams also create plenty of chances, with average xG of 2.08 for Tukums and 1.90 for Riga, although the hosts' scoring rate has dropped to 0.8 goals per match over their last 5 games. During the same period, Tukums conceded an average of 2.0 goals, boosting Riga's chances; Riga scored 1.6 goals per match. The Over 2.5 and Over 3.5 lines carry more risk: despite high season-long rates of matches featuring at least 3 goals — 81% and 73% — the corresponding figures recently fell to 60% and 40%. The forecast of 3.15 total goals therefore makes Over 1.5 the most likely choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal comes from the last five matches: Tukums did not lead at the break in any of them and were trailing at half-time in three, while Riga led in two and never went into the break behind. Over this period, the hosts averaged 0.2 goals scored before half-time and conceded 0.8, whereas the visitors scored 0.6 and conceded 0.2, which points to Riga leading at the break. Full-time results also favor the visitors: Riga won three of their last five matches and did not lose any, while Tukums won only once and suffered three defeats. Tukums’ season average of 2.88 goals compared with Riga’s 2.67 shows that the hosts have potential, but their recent scoring has dropped to 0.8 goals per match while conceding 2.0. Therefore, I’m backing Riga to lead at half-time and win at full-time, although a draw at the break remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

32Possession (%)68
TukumsRiga
10Shots14
TukumsRiga
2Shots on target7
TukumsRiga
1.05xG1.88
TukumsRiga
4Corners5
TukumsRiga
38Dangerous attacks69
TukumsRiga
16Fouls17
TukumsRiga
3Cards4
TukumsRiga

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.42Goals scored / game2.77
TukumsRiga
1.97Goals allowed / game0.97
TukumsRiga
43%Average possession63%
TukumsRiga
4.58Shots on target / game6.29
TukumsRiga

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.61Shots per game16.94
TukumsRiga
4.58Shots on target6.29
TukumsRiga
12.2%Shot conversion16.4%
TukumsRiga
43%Possession63%
TukumsRiga
1.4xG for1.99
TukumsRiga
1.74xG against0.95
TukumsRiga

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingRiga: Dominant
TukumsRiga
Accuracy (shots on target)39%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Riga is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Tukums · 1.6 pts / game - Riga

Tukums
LLWLD
Season result split
16% W29% D55% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-17
0.77 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Riga
LDDWW
Season result split
71% W23% D6% L
Season (W-D-L)
22-7-2
2.35 pts / game · goal difference +56
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
10-3-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 0.85BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Riga is 95% better for: goals scored per game.

1.42 goals / game - Tukums · 2.77 goals / game - Riga

Riga is 103% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.97 goals / game - Tukums · 0.97 goals / game - Riga

Tukums scoring profile: strong

Tukums scores in 84% of games (26 of 31 games), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 42% (13 of 31 games).

Riga scoring profile: very strong

Riga scores in 97% of games (30 of 31 games), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 3% (1 of 31 games).

44Goals scored (season)86
TukumsRiga
61Goals conceded (season)30
TukumsRiga
3.39Average goals per game3.74
TukumsRiga
4Goals scored (last 5)7
TukumsRiga
10Goals conceded (last 5)6
TukumsRiga

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal97%
TukumsRiga
29%2 goals81%
TukumsRiga
13%3 goals58%
TukumsRiga
6%4 goals29%
TukumsRiga

How often they concede at least...

97%1 goal58%
TukumsRiga
58%2 goals26%
TukumsRiga
35%3 goals13%
TukumsRiga
6%4 goals0%
TukumsRiga

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time26%
TukumsRiga
6%BTTS in both halves10%
TukumsRiga
23%Scored in both halves55%
TukumsRiga

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
TukumsRiga
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
TukumsRiga
60%BTTS - last 560%
TukumsRiga

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
TukumsRiga
55%Min. 2 goals before half-time58%
TukumsRiga
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time32%
TukumsRiga

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
TukumsRiga
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
TukumsRiga
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
TukumsRiga

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Riga is 127% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / game - Tukums · 2.13 pts / game - Riga

Tukums - half-time state
19% leading35% draw45% trailing
Riga - half-time state
65% leading19% draw16% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per game (1st half)2.13
TukumsRiga
0.68Goals scored (1st half)1.39
TukumsRiga
0.97Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
TukumsRiga
1.65Average goals (1st half)1.84
TukumsRiga
29%Clean sheet before half-time65%
TukumsRiga
48%No goal before half-time26%
TukumsRiga

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per game (2nd half)1.97
TukumsRiga
0.74Goals scored (2nd half)1.39
TukumsRiga
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.52
TukumsRiga
1.74Average goals (2nd half)1.9
TukumsRiga
32%Clean sheet after half-time65%
TukumsRiga
45%No goal after half-time23%
TukumsRiga

Tukums - second-half results

29% W29% D42% L
29
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 16%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Riga - second-half results

55% W32% D13% L
66
Half-time points
43
Half-time goals
+29
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+27
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at halftime in 65% of games and wins 71%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.20
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Riga - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
13
16-30
11
10
31-45
4
9
46-60
4
13
61-75
15
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Riga
ScoredConceded
8
5
0-15
16
5
16-30
19
4
31-45
11
7
46-60
12
4
61-75
20
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.56
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
126%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
81%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
158%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Riga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.78
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
222%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaRiga
Average goals per game▲ 3.392.84▲ 3.74
Both teams scored▲ 81%54%▲ 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 71%53%▲ 77%
Clean sheets▼ 3%26%▲ 42%
Goal before half-time▲ 87%73%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%80%• 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsYellow cardKristers Volkovs
  2. TukumsYellow cardDāvis Mārcis Valmiers
  3. RigaYellow cardAhmed Ankrah
  4. RigaYellow cardAndrés Salazar Osorio
  5. RigaSubstitutionOn: Raki AouaniOff: Caio Ferreira Martins
  6. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Rūdolfs MeļķisOff: Dāvis Mārcis Valmiers
  7. TukumsYellow cardRuslans Deružinskis
  8. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Emīls SpruktsOff: Kristaps Kļaviņš
  9. RigaYellow cardSalah Oulad M'Hand
  10. RigaSubstitutionOn: Abdulrahman TaiwoOff: Salah Oulad M'Hand
  11. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Daniels Huberts KairaOff: Maksym Derkach
  12. RigaYellow cardIago Siqueira Augusto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 5 losses against Riga. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 43% of them.

Riga
3 : 1
Tukums
Tukums
1 : 3
Riga
Riga
3 : 3
Tukums
Riga FC
0 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
0 : 1
Riga FC
Riga FC
3 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
0 : 3
Riga FC

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Riga?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 0:2 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Riga?

In the last 7 head-to-head matches Tukums won 0, Riga won 5 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Riga?

Tukums score 1.42 goals per game on average and Riga 2.77. The Virsliga average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 81% of Tukums's matches and 58% of Riga's.

What form are Tukums and Riga in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Riga 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Riga?

The statistical background for Tukums vs Riga — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.