South Korea - K League 1Ulsan Munsu Football StadiumData current as of August 30, 2026

Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: match statistics

Ulsan crest
Ulsan
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ulsan played against Sangju Sangmu in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Ulsan has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sangju Sangmu has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Ulsan scores 1.52 goals per game and allows 1.44. Sangju Sangmu scores 0.92 and allows 1.16. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 68% of Ulsan's games and 60% of Sangju Sangmu's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 28%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ulsan has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.49 per game. Ulsan takes 14.0 shots per game, while Sangju Sangmu takes 12.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Ulsan leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ulsan's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For Sangju Sangmu, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 1 games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ulsan have a clear attacking advantage at home: they average 1.67 goals, create 1.84 xG and register 5.17 shots on target per match, compared with Sangju Sangmu’s 1.00 goal, 1.35 xG and 3.54 shots on target away from home. However, the hosts are highly vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.75 goals at home with 1.66 xG allowed to opponents and keeping a clean sheet in only 17% of matches. Sangju Sangmu score infrequently, netting just 3 goals in their last five matches, but they have also conceded only 3 goals over the same period. The visitors draw particularly often away from home, sharing the points in 54% of such matches, while Ulsan have lost as many as 50% of their home games. Both teams have collected 1.2 points per match over their last five league fixtures, so Ulsan’s superior chance quality could be neutralized by the visitors’ disciplined defense, making a draw the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The current-form signal points towards BTTS - No: in their last 5 matches, both teams recorded BTTS in only 40% of games, compared with the league average of 50%. Sangju Sangmu scored just 3 goals during this period, averaging 0.6 per match, while conceding only 0.6 goals per game. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 31% of their matches this season and failed to score in 31%, clearly increasing the likelihood that one side will remain goalless. Ulsan have a very poor 9% clean-sheet rate and a season BTTS rate of 73%, but their current results and the opponents' low attacking efficiency outweigh these figures in favor of a No Goal scenario for at least one team.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The profile of both teams clearly points toward a limited number of goals: 91% of Ulsan’s matches and 85% of Sangju Sangmu’s games finished with fewer than 3.5 goals. An even stronger signal comes from the low frequency of high-scoring results, as neither team has scored more than three goals in a single match, while their opponents have also failed to concede more than three on any occasion. Sangju Sangmu have scored just 3 goals and conceded 3 in their last five appearances, averaging 0.6 per match in both categories, which reduces the visitors’ offensive potential. Ulsan create chances worth an average of 1.61 xG, but their conversion rate is just 7%, while Sangju keep a clean sheet in 31% of their matches. The combined projection of 2.25 goals leaves a clear margin below the 3.5 line, making Under 3.5 goals the best option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most logical starting point, as Ulsan were level at the break in 55% of their matches, compared with 54% for Sangju Sangmu. Recent form further strengthens this scenario: the hosts were level at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, while the visitors recorded this outcome in as many as 80%, with both teams averaging just 0.2 goals scored in the first half. After the break, the advantage should shift towards Sangju Sangmu, who average 0.62 goals scored and 0.46 conceded, while Ulsan concede 0.82 goals in second halves. The visitors won the second half in 38% of their matches, whereas Ulsan have not won a single one, which, combined with their seasonal win rates of 23% and 9% for the hosts, supports the HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Sangju Sangmu win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
UlsanSangju Sangmu
3Shots3
UlsanSangju Sangmu
3Shots on target1
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.83xG0.93
UlsanSangju Sangmu
5Corners12
UlsanSangju Sangmu
58Dangerous attacks92
UlsanSangju Sangmu
6Fouls8
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1Cards2
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.52Goals scored / game0.92
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.44Goals allowed / game1.16
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Average possession56%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4.88Shots on target / game3.68
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14.04Shots per game12.6
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4.88Shots on target3.68
UlsanSangju Sangmu
10.8%Shot conversion7.3%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
47%Possession56%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.68xG for1.49
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.62xG against1.31
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Shooting quality

Ulsan: AttackingSangju Sangmu: Balanced
UlsanSangju Sangmu
Accuracy (shots on target)35%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sangju Sangmu is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.4 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan
WWLLL
Season result split
44% W16% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-4-10
1.48 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Sangju Sangmu
WDDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
16% W60% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-15-6
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-7-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ulsan is 65% better for: goals scored per game.

1.52 goals / game - Ulsan · 0.92 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu

Sangju Sangmu is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - Ulsan · 1.16 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan scoring profile: very strong

Ulsan scores in 80% of games (20 of 25 meczów), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 meczów).

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 meczów), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 meczów).

38Goals scored (season)23
UlsanSangju Sangmu
36Goals conceded (season)29
UlsanSangju Sangmu
2.96Average goals per game2.08
UlsanSangju Sangmu
8Goals scored (last 5)2
UlsanSangju Sangmu
7Goals conceded (last 5)1
UlsanSangju Sangmu

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal68%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
48%2 goals16%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
16%3 goals8%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4%4 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal76%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
36%2 goals32%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
16%3 goals8%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
8%4 goals0%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time16%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
4%BTTS in both halves8%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
32%Scored in both halves12%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
60%BTTS - last 520%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ulsan is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.16 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu

Ulsan - half-time state
28% leading40% draw32% trailing
Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
20% leading56% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per game (1st half)1.16
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.36
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.72Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.32Average goals (1st half)0.92
UlsanSangju Sangmu
56%Clean sheet before half-time60%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
56%No goal before half-time68%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

After half-time (2nd half)

1.28Points per game (2nd half)1.16
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
UlsanSangju Sangmu
0.72Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
UlsanSangju Sangmu
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.16
UlsanSangju Sangmu
36%Clean sheet after half-time40%
UlsanSangju Sangmu
32%No goal after half-time52%
UlsanSangju Sangmu

Ulsan - second-half results

28% W44% R28% P
31
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

20% W56% R24% P
29
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 16%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Ulsan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.21.4
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game0.62.4
1 goal20%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sangju Sangmu - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.40
Goals scored / game0.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game0.00.6
1 goal0%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ulsan
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
6
6
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
5
46-60
9
4
61-75
9
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ulsan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
113%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

UlsanLigaSangju Sangmu
Average goals per game 2.962.41 2.08
Both teams scored 68%51% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%44% 28%
Clean sheets 16%30% 24%
Goal before half-time 68%62% 56%
Goal after half-time 88%76% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.41
Average goals per game
51%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.14
Home goals / game
1.27
Away goals / game
+-10%
Home attack advantage
+-11%
Home defensive advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sangju SangmuGoalGeon-hee LeeAssist: Yun-Sang Hong
  2. Sangju SangmuYellow cardTae-Joon Park
  3. Sangju SangmuYellow cardJung-Taek Lee
  4. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Sang-Heon LeeOff: Se-Jin Park
  5. UlsanSubstitutionOn: Sang-Woo KangOff: Hee-Gyun Lee
  6. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Byung-Kwan JeonOff: Jae-Hyun Ko
  7. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: In-Gyun KimOff: Yun-Sang Hong
  8. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Jae-Min JeongOff: Geon-hee Lee
  9. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Dug-Keun LimOff: Kang-Hyeon Lee
  10. UlsanYellow cardJae-Sang Jung

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Ulsan's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Sangju Sangmu. Games average 2.60 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

Sangju Sangmu
1 : 2
Ulsan
Ulsan
0 : 0
Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
3 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i
3 : 2
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
2 : 0
Ulsan Hyundai Horang-i

FAQ

What was the result of Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 3:1 Sangju Sangmu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 2, Sangju Sangmu won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

Ulsan score 1.52 goals per game on average and Sangju Sangmu 0.92. The K League 1 average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Ulsan's matches and 60% of Sangju Sangmu's.

What form are Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu in?

Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sangju Sangmu 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?

The statistical background for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.