Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: match statistics
Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ulsan played against Sangju Sangmu in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Ulsan Munsu Football Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Ulsan has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Sangju Sangmu has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Ulsan scores 1.52 goals per game and allows 1.44. Sangju Sangmu scores 0.92 and allows 1.16. Games in this league average 2.41 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 68% of Ulsan's games and 60% of Sangju Sangmu's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 28%, compared with league averages of 51% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ulsan has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.49 per game. Ulsan takes 14.0 shots per game, while Sangju Sangmu takes 12.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Ulsan leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.56 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ulsan's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (9 goals). For Sangju Sangmu, it is minutes 61-75 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.41 goals. Both teams score in 51% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ulsan have a clear attacking advantage at home: they average 1.67 goals, create 1.84 xG and register 5.17 shots on target per match, compared with Sangju Sangmu’s 1.00 goal, 1.35 xG and 3.54 shots on target away from home. However, the hosts are highly vulnerable defensively, conceding an average of 1.75 goals at home with 1.66 xG allowed to opponents and keeping a clean sheet in only 17% of matches. Sangju Sangmu score infrequently, netting just 3 goals in their last five matches, but they have also conceded only 3 goals over the same period. The visitors draw particularly often away from home, sharing the points in 54% of such matches, while Ulsan have lost as many as 50% of their home games. Both teams have collected 1.2 points per match over their last five league fixtures, so Ulsan’s superior chance quality could be neutralized by the visitors’ disciplined defense, making a draw the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The current-form signal points towards BTTS - No: in their last 5 matches, both teams recorded BTTS in only 40% of games, compared with the league average of 50%. Sangju Sangmu scored just 3 goals during this period, averaging 0.6 per match, while conceding only 0.6 goals per game. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 31% of their matches this season and failed to score in 31%, clearly increasing the likelihood that one side will remain goalless. Ulsan have a very poor 9% clean-sheet rate and a season BTTS rate of 73%, but their current results and the opponents' low attacking efficiency outweigh these figures in favor of a No Goal scenario for at least one team.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The profile of both teams clearly points toward a limited number of goals: 91% of Ulsan’s matches and 85% of Sangju Sangmu’s games finished with fewer than 3.5 goals. An even stronger signal comes from the low frequency of high-scoring results, as neither team has scored more than three goals in a single match, while their opponents have also failed to concede more than three on any occasion. Sangju Sangmu have scored just 3 goals and conceded 3 in their last five appearances, averaging 0.6 per match in both categories, which reduces the visitors’ offensive potential. Ulsan create chances worth an average of 1.61 xG, but their conversion rate is just 7%, while Sangju keep a clean sheet in 31% of their matches. The combined projection of 2.25 goals leaves a clear margin below the 3.5 line, making Under 3.5 goals the best option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most logical starting point, as Ulsan were level at the break in 55% of their matches, compared with 54% for Sangju Sangmu. Recent form further strengthens this scenario: the hosts were level at half-time in 60% of their last five matches, while the visitors recorded this outcome in as many as 80%, with both teams averaging just 0.2 goals scored in the first half. After the break, the advantage should shift towards Sangju Sangmu, who average 0.62 goals scored and 0.46 conceded, while Ulsan concede 0.82 goals in second halves. The visitors won the second half in 38% of their matches, whereas Ulsan have not won a single one, which, combined with their seasonal win rates of 23% and 9% for the hosts, supports the HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time and a Sangju Sangmu win at full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ulsan | Sangju Sangmu | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sangju Sangmu is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.4 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulsan is 65% better for: goals scored per game.
1.52 goals / game - Ulsan · 0.92 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.44 goals / game - Ulsan · 1.16 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu
Ulsan scores in 80% of games (20 of 25 meczów), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 meczów).
Sangju Sangmu scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 meczów), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulsan
Over / Under - Sangju Sangmu
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ulsan is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.16 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulsan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Sangju Sangmu - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 16%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ulsan
Sangju Sangmu
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Ulsan | Liga | Sangju Sangmu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.96 | 2.41 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 51% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 44% | ▼ 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 30% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 62% | ▼ 56% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 76% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ulsan's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against Sangju Sangmu. Games average 2.60 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?
The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 3:1 Sangju Sangmu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 2, Sangju Sangmu won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?
Ulsan score 1.52 goals per game on average and Sangju Sangmu 0.92. The K League 1 average is 2.41 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Ulsan's matches and 60% of Sangju Sangmu's.
What form are Ulsan and Sangju Sangmu in?
Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Sangju Sangmu 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu?
The statistical background for Ulsan vs Sangju Sangmu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


