AFC Wimbledon vs Wycombe Wanderers: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
AFC Wimbledon vs Wycombe Wanderers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AFC Wimbledon play Wycombe Wanderers in EFL League One (England). The match date is 24 October 2026. Venue: Cherry Red Records Stadium.
Current form
AFC Wimbledon: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Wycombe Wanderers: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
AFC Wimbledon scores 0.64 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Wycombe Wanderers scores 1.64 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AFC Wimbledon 27%, Wycombe Wanderers 82%. Over 2.5: AFC Wimbledon 45%, Wycombe Wanderers 64%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Wycombe Wanderers has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.20. AFC Wimbledon: 10.7 shots per match, Wycombe Wanderers: 12.7.
Match halves
AFC Wimbledon: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.18. Wycombe Wanderers: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
AFC Wimbledon: 16-30 (3 goals). Wycombe Wanderers: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
League One: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Before the match
1X2 odds
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AFC Wimbledon | Wycombe Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 24% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wycombe Wanderers is 300% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - AFC Wimbledon · 1.6 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wycombe Wanderers is 156% better for: goals scored per match.
0.64 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon · 1.64 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers
AFC Wimbledon is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.64 goals / match - AFC Wimbledon · 2 goals / match - Wycombe Wanderers
AFC Wimbledon scores in 55% of matches (6 of 11 matches), while Wycombe Wanderers keeps a clean sheet in 18% (2 of 11 matches).
Wycombe Wanderers scores in 100% of matches (11 of 11 matches), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AFC Wimbledon
Over / Under - Wycombe Wanderers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wycombe Wanderers is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - AFC Wimbledon · 1.55 pts / match - Wycombe Wanderers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AFC Wimbledon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wycombe Wanderers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AFC Wimbledon
Wycombe Wanderers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).
Teams vs league
| AFC Wimbledon | Liga | Wycombe Wanderers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.27 | 2.84 | ▲ 3.64 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 27% | 57% | ▲ 82% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 54% | ▲ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 26% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 67% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 84% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): AFC Wimbledon 1 - 0 - 1 Wycombe Wanderers. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
When do AFC Wimbledon and Wycombe Wanderers play?
AFC Wimbledon face Wycombe Wanderers on 24 October 2026 in EFL League One at Cherry Red Records Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What is the head-to-head record between AFC Wimbledon and Wycombe Wanderers?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches AFC Wimbledon won 1, Wycombe Wanderers won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before AFC Wimbledon vs Wycombe Wanderers?
AFC Wimbledon score 0.64 goals per game on average and Wycombe Wanderers 1.64. The EFL League One average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 27% of AFC Wimbledon's matches and 82% of Wycombe Wanderers's.
What form are AFC Wimbledon and Wycombe Wanderers in?
Over the last 5 games AFC Wimbledon have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Wycombe Wanderers 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AFC Wimbledon vs Wycombe Wanderers?
The statistical background for AFC Wimbledon vs Wycombe Wanderers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.