Denmark - SuperligaVejlby StadionData current as of 19 October 2026

AGF vs Silkeborg: match statistics

AGF crest
AGF
2 : 2half-time 0:2
Silkeborg crest
Silkeborg

AGF vs Silkeborg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AGF played Silkeborg in Superliga (Denmark). The match was played on 5 September 2026. Venue: Vejlby Stadion. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

AGF: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Silkeborg: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

AGF scores 1.17 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Silkeborg scores 0.83 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.68 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AGF 83%, Silkeborg 67%. Over 2.5: AGF 67%, Silkeborg 33%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

AGF has higher xG: 1.92 vs 1.26. AGF: 18.2 shots per match, Silkeborg: 11.3.

Match halves

AGF: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.67. Silkeborg: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

AGF: 31-45+ (2 goals). Silkeborg: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Superliga: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AGF have failed to win any of their last five matches, losing four, but remain unbeaten at home, with both games ending in draws. The hosts create significantly more chances on their own turf, averaging 22 shots compared with Silkeborg’s 9.67, while their average xG stands at 2.28 versus 1.09 for the visitors. Silkeborg score just 0.67 goals per away game, fail to score in 33% of such fixtures and have lost 67% of them. AGF’s defence is far from reliable, however, conceding an average of 1.50 goals and keeping no clean sheets, which increases the likelihood of a closely contested match. Despite their poor recent run, the superior quality of chances created and home advantage point towards a narrow AGF victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is supported by a seasonal 67% rate for both teams, above the league average of 62%. AGF recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches, although they conceded as many as 2.4 goals per game while scoring 1.2 themselves. Silkeborg average only 0.67 goals, but AGF failed to keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches and allow opponents an xG of 1.45. The hosts should also create chances against a visiting defence that concedes an average of 1.67 goals and 1.74 xG per match. Silkeborg’s weaker recent attacking output of 0.6 goals per game reduces confidence in the pick, but the vulnerability of both defences gives a slight edge to the Goal/Goal scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

AGF create chances worth an average of 1.42 xG at home, while Silkeborg allow 1.74 xG away from home, so the hosts should come close to scoring 1.5 goals. The visitors’ attacking potential remains lower: they average 0.67 goals and generate 1.09 xG, although AGF’s defense allows opponents 1.45 xG. In both teams, 67% of matches so far have finished with under 3.5 goals, and none of their games has exceeded the 4.5-goal line. AGF are on a run of five matches with at least three goals, but this is mainly due to a weak defense that conceded 12 goals during this period, while Silkeborg scored only 3. The projected total of 2.68 goals points to a game with a realistic chance of 2–3 goals, while Under 3.5 offers the greatest safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Silkeborg have significantly stronger first-half data from their last five matches: they led at the break in 40% of them, while AGF failed to lead in any and went into half-time behind in as many as 80%. During this period, the hosts conceded an average of 1.8 goals in the first half, whereas Silkeborg allowed opponents just 0.2 goals. Despite AGF’s advantage in season-long xG, 1.42 to 1.09, the home side are in very poor form, averaging just 0.2 points per match across their last five appearances compared with Silkeborg’s 0.8. The visitors were trailing at half-time in 80% of their last five matches, but their early defensive organisation and AGF’s problems with starting matches strongly provide the greatest support for a Silkeborg lead at the break and an HT/FT 2/2 outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
AGFSilkeborg
16Shots10
AGFSilkeborg
6Shots on target4
AGFSilkeborg
1.91xG1.2
AGFSilkeborg
8Corners3
AGFSilkeborg
66Dangerous attacks39
AGFSilkeborg
10Fouls6
AGFSilkeborg
1Cards0
AGFSilkeborg

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.17Goals scored / match0.83
AGFSilkeborg
1.83Goals conceded / match1.5
AGFSilkeborg
58%Average possession47%
AGFSilkeborg
4.5Shots on target / match4
AGFSilkeborg

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

18.17Shots per match11.33
AGFSilkeborg
4.5Shots on target4
AGFSilkeborg
6.4%Shot conversion7.4%
AGFSilkeborg
58%Possession47%
AGFSilkeborg
1.92xG for1.26
AGFSilkeborg
1.42xG against1.6
AGFSilkeborg

Shooting quality

AGF: DominantSilkeborg: Balanced
AGFSilkeborg
Accuracy (shots on target)25%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Silkeborg is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - AGF · 0.8 pts / match - Silkeborg

AGF
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-3
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 2.01Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Silkeborg
LWLLD
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
DLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGF is 41% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - AGF · 0.83 goals / match - Silkeborg

Silkeborg is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - AGF · 1.5 goals / match - Silkeborg

AGF scoring profile: very strong

AGF scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Silkeborg keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Silkeborg scoring profile: very strong

Silkeborg scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

7Goals scored (season)5
AGFSilkeborg
11Goals conceded (season)9
AGFSilkeborg
3Average goals in match2.33
AGFSilkeborg
6Goals scored (last 5)4
AGFSilkeborg
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
AGFSilkeborg

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal83%
AGFSilkeborg
33%2 goals0%
AGFSilkeborg
0%3 goals0%
AGFSilkeborg
0%4 goals0%
AGFSilkeborg

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal83%
AGFSilkeborg
83%2 goals33%
AGFSilkeborg
0%3 goals33%
AGFSilkeborg
0%4 goals0%
AGFSilkeborg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time33%
AGFSilkeborg
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AGFSilkeborg
33%Scored in both halves0%
AGFSilkeborg

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
AGFSilkeborg
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AGFSilkeborg
80%BTTS - last 560%
AGFSilkeborg

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
AGFSilkeborg
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
AGFSilkeborg
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
AGFSilkeborg

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
AGFSilkeborg
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
AGFSilkeborg
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
AGFSilkeborg

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Silkeborg is 81% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - AGF · 1.5 pts / match - Silkeborg

AGF - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Silkeborg - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.5
AGFSilkeborg
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.67
AGFSilkeborg
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
AGFSilkeborg
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.17
AGFSilkeborg
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
AGFSilkeborg
50%No goal before half-time33%
AGFSilkeborg

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)0.67
AGFSilkeborg
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
AGFSilkeborg
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)1
AGFSilkeborg
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.17
AGFSilkeborg
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
AGFSilkeborg
33%No goal after half-time83%
AGFSilkeborg

AGF - second-half results

33% W17% D50% L
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Silkeborg - second-half results

17% W17% D67% L
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 17%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AGF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Silkeborg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.60
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AGF
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
3
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Silkeborg
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+13%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Silkeborg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

AGFLigaSilkeborg
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.68▼ 2.33
Both teams scored▲ 83%57%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%49%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 0%23%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%73%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%86%▼ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SilkeborgGoalRami Hajal
  2. SilkeborgSubstitutionOn: Kristian KirkegaardOff: Rami Hajal
  3. AGFSubstitutionOn: Jacob AndersenOff: Colin Rosler
  4. AGFSubstitutionOn: Stefen Erwan TchamcheOff: Magnus Knudsen
  5. AGFYellow cardMikael Anderson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): AGF 2 - 0 - 0 Silkeborg. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Silkeborg IF
0 : 2
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
3 : 1
Silkeborg IF

FAQ

What was the result of AGF vs Silkeborg?

The Superliga match finished AGF 2:2 Silkeborg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between AGF and Silkeborg?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches AGF won 2, Silkeborg won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before AGF vs Silkeborg?

AGF score 1.17 goals per game on average and Silkeborg 0.83. The Superliga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 83% of AGF's matches and 67% of Silkeborg's.

What form are AGF and Silkeborg in?

Over the last 5 games AGF have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Silkeborg 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AGF vs Silkeborg?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.