Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueData current as of 19 September 2026

Aktobe vs Ulytau: match statistics

Aktobe crest
Aktobe
2 : 2half-time 1:2
Ulytau crest
Ulytau

Aktobe vs Ulytau: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aktobe played Ulytau in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 18 September 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Aktobe: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Ulytau: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aktobe scores 1.44 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Ulytau scores 0.88 and concedes 1.20. League average: 2.48 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aktobe 56%, Ulytau 48%. Over 2.5: Aktobe 48%, Ulytau 40%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Aktobe has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.32. Aktobe: 13.6 shots per match, Ulytau: 11.2.

Match halves

Aktobe: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.88. Ulytau: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.48.

Goals by minute

Aktobe: 61-75 (8 goals). Ulytau: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.48 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Aktobe are clear favourites, winning 75% of their home matches, scoring an average of 1.67 goals and conceding just 0.67 per game. Ulytau have won only 8% of their away fixtures, average 0.67 goals scored, and failed to find the net in 42% of their appearances. The hosts also create more high-quality chances: their average xG stands at 1.73 compared with 1.18 for the visitors, while they register 6.17 shots on target per game versus Ulytau’s 2.5. Current form also favours Aktobe, who have won 3 of their last 5 matches and conceded 5 goals during that run, whereas Ulytau have suffered 3 defeats and conceded 10 goals. Aktobe’s solid defence, which has kept a clean sheet in 58% of their home matches, should further limit the visitors’ modest attacking potential.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Recent form favors goals at both ends: BTTS occurred in 80% of Aktobe’s last 5 matches and in 60% of Ulytau’s games. During this period, Aktobe averaged 1.4 goals and Ulytau 1.2, while the visitors conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match. The hosts should have solid chances of scoring, as they average 4.77 shots on target compared with Ulytau’s 2.50, while the opposition kept a clean sheet in only 17% of matches. Ulytau’s chances of scoring are limited by Aktobe’s 38% clean-sheet rate and the visitors’ season average of just 0.67 goals, but their recent xG of 1.38, combined with Aktobe conceding 1.08 xG, indicates that an away goal is a realistic possibility. Therefore, the BTTS - Yes pick is marginally stronger than the scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: Aktobe have not recorded a single match with at least four goals all season, while Ulytau have stayed below this line in 83% of their matches. The hosts concede just 0.92 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 38% of their appearances, while Ulytau score only 0.67 goals per game. However, Aktobe should create more chances, averaging 4.77 shots on target compared with the opponents’ 2.50, while the visitors concede an average of 1.50 goals. Recent form raises the projection to 2.42 goals, as Ulytau have conceded 10 goals in their last five matches, but this still does not provide strong grounds to expect four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by an Aktobe win, as Ulytau have drawn at the break in 58% of their matches, compared with 38% for Aktobe. The opening stages should be cautious: both teams average only 0.92 goals in the first half, while Aktobe keep a clean sheet at half-time in 62% of their matches. After the break, the hosts’ advantage should increase, as they average 0.62 goals, while Ulytau concede as many as 0.92 goals in the second half. Over the season, Aktobe have won 54% of their matches, compared with just 8% for Ulytau, while in their last five appearances the hosts have averaged 2.0 points per match versus 0.8 for their opponents. In addition, Ulytau have conceded an average of 2.0 goals per game during this run, increasing the likelihood that an even start will be followed by an Aktobe turnaround after half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
AktobeUlytau
13Shots10
AktobeUlytau
3Shots on target6
AktobeUlytau
1.55xG1.3
AktobeUlytau
7Corners6
AktobeUlytau
71Dangerous attacks34
AktobeUlytau
-1Fouls-1
AktobeUlytau
4Cards1
AktobeUlytau

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.44Goals scored / match0.88
AktobeUlytau
1.16Goals conceded / match1.2
AktobeUlytau
55%Average possession51%
AktobeUlytau
4.92Shots on target / match3.68
AktobeUlytau

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.56Shots per match11.16
AktobeUlytau
4.92Shots on target3.68
AktobeUlytau
10.6%Shot conversion7.9%
AktobeUlytau
55%Possession51%
AktobeUlytau
1.53xG for1.32
AktobeUlytau
1.35xG against1.47
AktobeUlytau

Shooting quality

Aktobe: BalancedUlytau: Balanced
AktobeUlytau
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Aktobe is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Aktobe · 0.8 pts / match - Ulytau

Aktobe
DWLWW
Season result split
48% W20% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-8
1.64 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-1
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ulytau
DLWLL
Season result split
32% W28% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-10
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aktobe is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - Aktobe · 0.88 goals / match - Ulytau

Aktobe scoring profile: very strong

Aktobe scores in 80% of matches (20 of 25 matches), while Ulytau keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

Ulytau scoring profile: strong

Ulytau scores in 68% of matches (17 of 25 matches), while Aktobe keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).

36Goals scored (season)22
AktobeUlytau
29Goals conceded (season)30
AktobeUlytau
2.6Average goals in match2.08
AktobeUlytau
7Goals scored (last 5)6
AktobeUlytau
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
AktobeUlytau

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal68%
AktobeUlytau
44%2 goals16%
AktobeUlytau
12%3 goals4%
AktobeUlytau
8%4 goals0%
AktobeUlytau

How often they concede at least...

72%1 goal72%
AktobeUlytau
28%2 goals32%
AktobeUlytau
12%3 goals16%
AktobeUlytau
4%4 goals0%
AktobeUlytau

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time20%
AktobeUlytau
8%BTTS in both halves0%
AktobeUlytau
28%Scored in both halves12%
AktobeUlytau

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
AktobeUlytau
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
AktobeUlytau
80%BTTS - last 560%
AktobeUlytau

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
AktobeUlytau
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
AktobeUlytau
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
AktobeUlytau

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
AktobeUlytau
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time32%
AktobeUlytau
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
AktobeUlytau

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aktobe is 41% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / match - Aktobe · 1.08 pts / match - Ulytau

Aktobe - half-time state
36% leading44% draw20% trailing
Ulytau - half-time state
20% leading48% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per match (1st half)1.08
AktobeUlytau
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.4
AktobeUlytau
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.52
AktobeUlytau
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.92
AktobeUlytau
64%Clean sheet before half-time52%
AktobeUlytau
52%No goal before half-time60%
AktobeUlytau

After half-time (2nd half)

1.4Points per match (2nd half)1.2
AktobeUlytau
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.48
AktobeUlytau
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
AktobeUlytau
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.16
AktobeUlytau
48%Clean sheet after half-time52%
AktobeUlytau
40%No goal after half-time60%
AktobeUlytau

Aktobe - second-half results

32% W44% D24% L
38
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ulytau - second-half results

28% W36% D36% L
27
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding160%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Aktobe - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ulytau - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aktobe
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
6
0
16-30
7
4
31-45
6
5
46-60
8
3
61-75
8
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Ulytau
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
5
16-30
6
6
31-45
1
6
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.34
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aktobe

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Ulytau

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

AktobeLigaUlytau
Average goals in match 2.602.48 2.08
Both teams scored 56%54% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%48% 40%
Clean sheets 28%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 68%67% 68%
Goal after half-time 80%74% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.48
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.43
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AktobeYellow cardTemirlan Erlanov
  2. AktobeYellow cardSenna Miangue
  3. UlytauSubstitutionOn: Beka VachiberadzeOff: Abzal Taubay
  4. AktobeYellow cardOluwaseyi Babajide Ojo
  5. AktobeSubstitutionOn: Giorgi ZariaOff: Georgiy Zhukov
  6. AktobeSubstitutionOn: Abat AymbetovOff: Daniel Sosah
  7. AktobeYellow cardGiorgi Zaria
  8. UlytauYellow cardOrken Nurali

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Aktobe 1 - 1 - 1 Ulytau. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Ulytau
1 : 1
Aktobe
FK Ulytau Zhezkazgan
2 : 1
FK Aktobe
FK Aktobe
1 : 0
FK Ulytau Zhezkazgan

FAQ

What was the result of Aktobe vs Ulytau?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Aktobe 2:2 Ulytau. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Aktobe and Ulytau?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Aktobe won 1, Ulytau won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Aktobe vs Ulytau?

Aktobe score 1.44 goals per game on average and Ulytau 0.88. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Aktobe's matches and 48% of Ulytau's.

What form are Aktobe and Ulytau in?

Over the last 5 games Aktobe have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Ulytau 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aktobe vs Ulytau?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.