Al Ahed vs Jwaya: match statistics
Al Ahed vs Jwaya: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Ahed played Jwaya in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Sour Stadium. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Al Ahed: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Jwaya: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Ahed scores 1.50 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Jwaya scores 1.32 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.45 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Ahed 43%, Jwaya 25%. Over 2.5: Al Ahed 50%, Jwaya 32%. League level: BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 45%.
xG, shots and style
Al Ahed has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.26. Al Ahed: 9.2 shots per match, Jwaya: 6.6.
Match halves
Al Ahed: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.82. Jwaya: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.82.
Goals by minute
Al Ahed: 61-75 (9 goals). Jwaya: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Lebanese Premier League: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 36%, Over 2.5 45%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an Al Ahed win. The hosts average 1.42 goals at home with 4.42 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, giving them an edge in the quality of chances. Jwaya away averages 1.31 goals with 3.5 shots on target and a 14% conversion, but their away xG is 1.27 versus xG against 0.90, indicating the visitors generate slightly more expected value and are defensively more solid. In the last 5 matches Al Ahed have scored 8 and conceded 10, while Jwaya have scored only 3 and conceded 4, so the hosts play more open games and the visitors prioritize defensive compactness. Considering Al Ahed’s lower share of clean-sheet-less games (33% vs 38%), the advantage in shots on target and better conversion, I assign Al Ahed a 45% chance, draw 30% and Jwaya 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS indicators for both teams are low: Al Ahed 25% and Jwaya 15%, while the league BTTS rate is only 32%, indicating matches with both teams scoring are uncommon. This is reinforced by high clean sheet percentages: the home side have 58% of matches without conceding, the visitors 54%, and the league overall has as much as 80% clean sheets, which strongly favors a No Goal scenario. Offensive metrics show a moderate scoring potential (xG 1.32 vs 1.27, shots 10.22 vs 9.4, on target 4.22 vs 3.5), but Jwaya have averaged only 0.6 goals in their last 5 matches with a 20% BTTS rate, which limits the likelihood of both teams scoring. Al Ahed have a 60% BTTS rate in their last 5 and conceded on average 2.0 goals in that period; however, this short-term vulnerability does not outweigh the seasonal trends (low BTTS 25%/15% and high CS 58%/54%). Therefore I recommend a "No" pick with a 28% probability for Yes and 72% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The combination of Al Ahed’s attacking xG (1.32) and Jwaya’s average xG conceded (0.90) yields about 1.11 expected goals for Al Ahed; similarly, Jwaya’s attacking xG (1.27) and Al Ahed’s xG conceded (1.13) gives 1.20 for the visitors, totaling 2.31 expected goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.31 translates to roughly a 67% chance of Over 1.5 goals, about 40% for Over 2.5 and around 20% for Over 3.5. Additionally, seasonal rates show Al Ahed have 50% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Jwaya 69%, while Over 0.5 occurs in 75% of home matches and 92% of away matches; note Jwaya’s higher shot efficiency (14% vs 8%), which raises scoring chances despite fewer shots. Offsetting factors are frequent clean sheets (58% for Al Ahed and 54% for Jwaya) and a low frequency of both teams scoring (25% and 15%), although Al Ahed’s last 5 matches include 8 scored and 10 conceded goals, increasing the risk of more goals. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — the 1.5 line appears the best choice with a 67% probability and an expected 2.31 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal is a draw at half-time and full-time (X/X) — I assigned this scenario 35% because the home side were level at the break in 58% of their matches and the away side in 85%, giving an average suggesting about a 70% chance of a draw at half-time. Homes score an average of 0.67 goals by the break versus 0.31 for visitors, but the high proportion of clean halves (83% for homes and 92% for visitors) indicates most HT draws are 0–0 or low-scoring halves. Additionally, both teams’ low tendency for matches where both score (25% for homes and 15% for visitors) and the league’s high rate of clean-sheet matches (80%) increase the likelihood the half-time deadlock will hold to full-time, which is why X/X at 35% is higher than X/1 or X/2. There is risk of a turnaround, since in the second half visitors average 1.0 goals versus 0.75 for homes, and the home xG of 1.32 is very close to the away xG of 1.27 — therefore I set X/1 at 28% and X/2 at 5% as the next most likely outcomes. The remaining distributions (1/1 14%, 1/X 4%, 1/2 2%, 2/2 7%, 2/X 3%, 2/1 2%) reflect that homes lead at the break more often (33% versus 15% for visitors), but the course of the second half can still overturn the result.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Ahed | Jwaya | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 47% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Jwaya is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - Al Ahed · 0.8 pts / match - Jwaya
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Ahed is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.5 goals / match - Al Ahed · 1.32 goals / match - Jwaya
Jwaya is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Al Ahed · 0.75 goals / match - Jwaya
Al Ahed scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Jwaya keeps a clean sheet in 54% (15 of 28 matches).
Jwaya scores in 64% of matches (18 of 28 matches), while Al Ahed keeps a clean sheet in 36% (10 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Al Ahed
Over / Under — Jwaya
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Ahed is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / match - Al Ahed · 1.39 pts / match - Jwaya
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Ahed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Jwaya - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 46%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Ahed
Jwaya
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Al Ahed | Liga | Jwaya | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.75 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.07 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 36% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▼ 32% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 36% | 38% | ▲ 54% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 57% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 77% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Al AhedGoalHussein Dakik
- JwayaGoalZain Faran
- JwayaAssistWaleed Shour
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Al Ahed 2 - 0 - 1 Jwaya. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Ahed vs Jwaya?
The Lebanese Premier League match finished Al Ahed 2:2 Jwaya. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Al Ahed and Jwaya?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Al Ahed won 2, Jwaya won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Ahed vs Jwaya?
Al Ahed score 1.50 goals per game on average and Jwaya 1.32. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Al Ahed's matches and 25% of Jwaya's.
What form are Al Ahed and Jwaya in?
Over the last 5 games Al Ahed have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Jwaya 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Ahed vs Jwaya?
The statistical background for Al Ahed vs Jwaya — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


