Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: match statistics
Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Hazm played Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 21 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Taawon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Hazm scores 1.09 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Al Taawon scores 1.79 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.02 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Hazm 61%, Al Taawon 67%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 61%, Al Taawon 55%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
xG is very similar for both teams. Al Hazm: 11.5 shots per match, Al Taawon: 11.6.
Match halves
Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.67. Al Taawon: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.03.
Goals by minute
Al Hazm: 76-90+ (12 goals). Al Taawon: 61-75 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Professional League: 3.02 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Taawon (away) are the favorites: they have 15 wins this season versus Al Hazm’s 10 and have scored 59 goals versus 36. The visitors’ key advantage is efficiency and goal difference — Al Taawon score an average of 1.88 goals away with a conversion rate of 19% and concede 1.25 per match, while the hosts at home average 1.25 goals with a 10% conversion and concede 1.88. Although Al Hazm have higher home xG (1.45 vs the visitors’ xG 1.18) and more shots (13 vs 9.94), their 31% of matches without a goal highlights finishing issues. In the last 5 matches Al Taawon have scored 9 goals versus Al Hazm’s 5 and have higher points per game over the last 5 (1.4 vs 1.0), confirming the current advantage. Therefore I assess probabilities at 55% for Al Taawon, 20% for Al Hazm and 25% for a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show high BTTS rates: Al Hazm 65% and Al Taawon 69%, versus a league average BTTS of 59%, which historically supports a Goal/Goal scenario. In the last 5 matches Al Taawon had BTTS in 80% of games, scoring 1.8 and conceding 1.4 on average, while Al Hazm in their last 5 had BTTS 60% and averaged 1.0 scored and 1.8 conceded; these differences indicate a clearer attacking form from the visitors. xG analysis shows Al Hazm generates xG 1.43 against Al Taawon’s average xG conceded 1.68, and Al Taawon creates xG 1.18 with Al Hazm conceding xG 1.25 — statistically both sides produce chances that enable goals. Additionally, Al Hazm averages 13.24 shots (3.94 on target) and Al Taawon 9.94 shots (4.38 on target) with shot conversion rates of 13% and 19%, and low clean sheet percentages of 24% and 13% further increase the BTTS likelihood. Considering the combined signal (season BTTS 65%/69%, last5 60%/80%, xG and shot dynamics), I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 78% versus 22% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Forecast based on average xG: Al Hazm has xG 1.43, Al Taawon 1.18, and factoring xG against (Al Taawon concedes 1.68, Al Hazm concedes 1.25) yields an expected 1.56 goals for the home side and 1.22 for the away side, total 2.78. Seasonal rates show Over 1.5 occurred in 88% of Al Hazm matches and 75% of Al Taawon matches (average ~82%), and the league registers 3.02 goals per game, which supports Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, the home team has Over 2.5 in 47% of matches, the away team in 63% (average 55%), and in the last 5 matches both teams had Over 2.5 in 60% of cases, so the signal for Over 2.5 is moderate (≈56%). High BTTS: 65% and 69% and 3.94 and 4.38 shots on target with conversion 13% vs 19% suggest both teams create chances and will try to hit the target, increasing the probability of at least two goals. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5), Over 2.5 has moderate support (56%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (≈37%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Al Taawon led at half-time in 50% of their matches this season, while Al Hazm did so in only 29%, and first-half draws occurred in roughly 31–35% of games, giving the visitors a clear advantage before the interval. At half-time Al Taawon average 1.00 goal versus 0.53 for Al Hazm, but after the break the home side score on average 1.18 goals compared to 0.88 for the visitors, so Al Hazm have a stronger second half and the potential for a turnaround. Over the full match the favorites remain the visitors: they win 50% of their fixtures this season versus 41% for the hosts and have higher goals-per-game (1.88 vs 1.71), as well as better shot conversion (19% conversion compared to 13% for Hazm), which supports maintaining a lead. Additionally Al Hazm create more chances (on average 13.24 shots and xG 1.43 versus 9.94 shots and xG 1.18 for Al Taawon), so a comeback is realistic but not strong enough to outweigh the visitors’ statistical advantage. On this basis the most likely scenario is Al Taawon leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2) — 29%, with notable alternatives X/2 (13%) and 2/X (9%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Hazm | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Al Taawon is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.4 pts / match - Al Taawon
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Taawon is 64% better for: goals scored per match.
1.09 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.79 goals / match - Al Taawon
Al Taawon is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.33 goals / match - Al Taawon
Al Hazm scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).
Al Taawon scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Hazm
Over / Under - Al Taawon
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Taawon is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.52 pts / match - Al Taawon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Hazm - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Taawon - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Hazm
Al Taawon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Al Hazm | Liga | Al Taawon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.82 | 3.02 | ▲ 3.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 61% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 57% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 23% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 76% | • 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Hazm 0 - 1 - 0 Al Taawon. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?
The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 2:0 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?
Al Hazm score 1.09 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.79. The Professional League average is 3.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Al Hazm's matches and 67% of Al Taawon's.
What form are Al Hazm and Al Taawon in?
Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Taawon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


