Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon

Al Hazm vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hazm played Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 21 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Al Taawon: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hazm scores 1.09 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Al Taawon scores 1.79 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hazm 61%, Al Taawon 67%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 61%, Al Taawon 55%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Al Hazm: 11.5 shots per match, Al Taawon: 11.6.

Match halves

Al Hazm: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.67. Al Taawon: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.03.

Goals by minute

Al Hazm: 76-90+ (12 goals). Al Taawon: 61-75 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.02 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Al Taawon (away) are the favorites: they have 15 wins this season versus Al Hazm’s 10 and have scored 59 goals versus 36. The visitors’ key advantage is efficiency and goal difference — Al Taawon score an average of 1.88 goals away with a conversion rate of 19% and concede 1.25 per match, while the hosts at home average 1.25 goals with a 10% conversion and concede 1.88. Although Al Hazm have higher home xG (1.45 vs the visitors’ xG 1.18) and more shots (13 vs 9.94), their 31% of matches without a goal highlights finishing issues. In the last 5 matches Al Taawon have scored 9 goals versus Al Hazm’s 5 and have higher points per game over the last 5 (1.4 vs 1.0), confirming the current advantage. Therefore I assess probabilities at 55% for Al Taawon, 20% for Al Hazm and 25% for a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show high BTTS rates: Al Hazm 65% and Al Taawon 69%, versus a league average BTTS of 59%, which historically supports a Goal/Goal scenario. In the last 5 matches Al Taawon had BTTS in 80% of games, scoring 1.8 and conceding 1.4 on average, while Al Hazm in their last 5 had BTTS 60% and averaged 1.0 scored and 1.8 conceded; these differences indicate a clearer attacking form from the visitors. xG analysis shows Al Hazm generates xG 1.43 against Al Taawon’s average xG conceded 1.68, and Al Taawon creates xG 1.18 with Al Hazm conceding xG 1.25 — statistically both sides produce chances that enable goals. Additionally, Al Hazm averages 13.24 shots (3.94 on target) and Al Taawon 9.94 shots (4.38 on target) with shot conversion rates of 13% and 19%, and low clean sheet percentages of 24% and 13% further increase the BTTS likelihood. Considering the combined signal (season BTTS 65%/69%, last5 60%/80%, xG and shot dynamics), I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 78% versus 22% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Forecast based on average xG: Al Hazm has xG 1.43, Al Taawon 1.18, and factoring xG against (Al Taawon concedes 1.68, Al Hazm concedes 1.25) yields an expected 1.56 goals for the home side and 1.22 for the away side, total 2.78. Seasonal rates show Over 1.5 occurred in 88% of Al Hazm matches and 75% of Al Taawon matches (average ~82%), and the league registers 3.02 goals per game, which supports Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, the home team has Over 2.5 in 47% of matches, the away team in 63% (average 55%), and in the last 5 matches both teams had Over 2.5 in 60% of cases, so the signal for Over 2.5 is moderate (≈56%). High BTTS: 65% and 69% and 3.94 and 4.38 shots on target with conversion 13% vs 19% suggest both teams create chances and will try to hit the target, increasing the probability of at least two goals. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (pick: Over 1.5), Over 2.5 has moderate support (56%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely (≈37%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Al Taawon led at half-time in 50% of their matches this season, while Al Hazm did so in only 29%, and first-half draws occurred in roughly 31–35% of games, giving the visitors a clear advantage before the interval. At half-time Al Taawon average 1.00 goal versus 0.53 for Al Hazm, but after the break the home side score on average 1.18 goals compared to 0.88 for the visitors, so Al Hazm have a stronger second half and the potential for a turnaround. Over the full match the favorites remain the visitors: they win 50% of their fixtures this season versus 41% for the hosts and have higher goals-per-game (1.88 vs 1.71), as well as better shot conversion (19% conversion compared to 13% for Hazm), which supports maintaining a lead. Additionally Al Hazm create more chances (on average 13.24 shots and xG 1.43 versus 9.94 shots and xG 1.18 for Al Taawon), so a comeback is realistic but not strong enough to outweigh the visitors’ statistical advantage. On this basis the most likely scenario is Al Taawon leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2) — 29%, with notable alternatives X/2 (13%) and 2/X (9%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Al HazmAl Taawon
20Shots17
Al HazmAl Taawon
8Shots on target3
Al HazmAl Taawon
2.02xG1.75
Al HazmAl Taawon
9Corners3
Al HazmAl Taawon
29Dangerous attacks64
Al HazmAl Taawon
14Fouls7
Al HazmAl Taawon
1Cards1
Al HazmAl Taawon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.09Goals scored / match1.79
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.73Goals conceded / match1.33
Al HazmAl Taawon
46%Average possession52%
Al HazmAl Taawon
4.12Shots on target / match4.15
Al HazmAl Taawon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.52Shots per match11.64
Al HazmAl Taawon
4.12Shots on target4.15
Al HazmAl Taawon
9.5%Shot conversion15.4%
Al HazmAl Taawon
46%Possession52%
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.31xG for1.31
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.44xG against1.46
Al HazmAl Taawon

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedAl Taawon: Efficient finishing
Al HazmAl Taawon
Accuracy (shots on target)36%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Taawon is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.4 pts / match - Al Taawon

Al Hazm
WDLDL
Season result split
30% W27% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-9-14
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -21
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-7
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Al Taawon
WLWLD
Season result split
45% W24% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-10
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-5
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 64% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.79 goals / match - Al Taawon

Al Taawon is 30% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.33 goals / match - Al Taawon

Al Hazm scoring profile: very strong

Al Hazm scores in 64% of matches (21 of 33 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 33 matches).

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 85% of matches (28 of 33 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 33 matches).

36Goals scored (season)59
Al HazmAl Taawon
57Goals conceded (season)44
Al HazmAl Taawon
2.82Average goals in match3.12
Al HazmAl Taawon
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Al HazmAl Taawon
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
Al HazmAl Taawon

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal85%
Al HazmAl Taawon
39%2 goals48%
Al HazmAl Taawon
6%3 goals21%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%4 goals12%
Al HazmAl Taawon

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal82%
Al HazmAl Taawon
48%2 goals39%
Al HazmAl Taawon
18%3 goals6%
Al HazmAl Taawon
12%4 goals3%
Al HazmAl Taawon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
Al HazmAl Taawon
0%BTTS in both halves3%
Al HazmAl Taawon
15%Scored in both halves30%
Al HazmAl Taawon

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS52%
Al HazmAl Taawon
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Al HazmAl Taawon
60%BTTS - last 580%
Al HazmAl Taawon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Al HazmAl Taawon
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Al HazmAl Taawon
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Al HazmAl Taawon

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Al HazmAl Taawon
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Al HazmAl Taawon
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time30%
Al HazmAl Taawon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 48% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.03 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.52 pts / match - Al Taawon

Al Hazm - half-time state
18% leading48% draw33% trailing
Al Taawon - half-time state
39% leading33% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.03Points per match (1st half)1.52
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.76
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.24
Al HazmAl Taawon
48%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Al HazmAl Taawon
70%No goal before half-time48%
Al HazmAl Taawon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Al HazmAl Taawon
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.03
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
Al HazmAl Taawon
1.76Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Al HazmAl Taawon
36%Clean sheet after half-time39%
Al HazmAl Taawon
52%No goal after half-time36%
Al HazmAl Taawon

Al Hazm - second-half results

30% W24% R45% P
34
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - second-half results

33% W42% R24% P
50
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
3
10
0-15
4
5
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
9
46-60
2
9
61-75
12
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
6
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
11
9
46-60
15
6
61-75
8
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
125%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaAl Taawon
Average goals in match 2.823.02 3.12
Both teams scored 61%59% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 61%57% 55%
Clean sheets 9%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 61%76% 76%
Goal after half-time 85%81% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.02
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Al HazmYellow cardYoussouf Oumarou Alio
  2. Al TaawonYellow cardFlavio Medeiros da Silva
  3. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Abdelmounaim BoutouilOff: Fábio Santos Martins

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Faisal AlblwiMatches officiated: 10
4.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 260%Home wins10%Draws30%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hazm 0 - 1 - 0 Al Taawon. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 2:0 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?

Al Hazm score 1.09 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.79. The Professional League average is 3.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Al Hazm's matches and 67% of Al Taawon's.

What form are Al Hazm and Al Taawon in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Al Taawon 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Al Taawon?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.