Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 17 October 2026

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: match statistics

Al Hazm crest
Al Hazm
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Neom SC crest
Neom SC

Al Hazm vs Neom SC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hazm played Neom SC in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Al Hazm: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Neom SC: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hazm scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Neom SC scores 1.86 and concedes 0.86. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hazm 57%, Neom SC 29%. Over 2.5: Al Hazm 43%, Neom SC 43%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.14. Al Hazm: 9.7 shots per match, Neom SC: 14.0.

Match halves

Al Hazm: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.29. Neom SC: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

Al Hazm: 0-15 (3 goals). Neom SC: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Neom SC sit 5th and have won 5 of their 7 league matches, while 10th-placed Al Hazm have recorded 2 wins in 7 games. In their last five rounds, the visitors scored 9 goals and won 3 times, while the hosts found the net 5 times and claimed just one victory. Away from home, Neom average 1.33 goals scored and 0.33 conceded, whereas Al Hazm score an average of 0.67 goals at home, which points in the visitors’ favour. However, the gap in chance quality is marginal: Neom’s away xG is 1.09 compared with Al Hazm’s 1.02 at home, so the hosts could keep the match finely balanced. The visitors have won 2 of their 3 away games so far, but with xG so close, a draw remains a realistic possibility.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest indicator that at least one team will fail to score is Neom SC’s record: BTTS occurred in 0% of their away matches, and they kept a clean sheet in 67% of them. Al Hazm average 2.25 goals at home and post an xG of 1.79, so their attacking potential means the BTTS - No pick is far from certain. On the other hand, Neom SC concede just 0.33 goals per away match, while Al Hazm have failed to score in 25% of their home games. The visitors average 1.33 goals away from home but have drawn a blank in 33% of those matches, so they too could end up without a goal. BTTS landed in 60% of Al Hazm’s and just 20% of Neom SC’s last five matches. Therefore, despite arguments in favour of both teams scoring, BTTS - No is the slightly more likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line was not breached in 75% of Al Hazm’s matches or in any of Neom SC’s matches included in the season data. Neom SC concede just 0.33 goals on average and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, limiting the hosts’ scoring potential despite their average of 2.25 goals scored. Al Hazm, meanwhile, concede 1.25 goals on average, rising to 1.4 over their last five matches, so an away goal remains likely. Both teams went Over 2.5 goals in 40% of their last five matches, supporting a cautious forecast of 2.4 total goals. Under 3.5 goals therefore offers more room for error than Under 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Neom SC were level at half-time in 2 of their 3 away matches and did not concede in the first half in any of them, pointing to an evenly matched start. Al Hazm average 1.5 goals before the break at home, but over their last five matches overall their first-half average has fallen to 0.6, so an early lead for the hosts is far from certain. Across those same five matches, Neom won 3 times and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while Al Hazm won just once and averaged 1.0 goal. Although the hosts have won 3 of their 4 home matches, Neom won 2 of their 3 away games and conceded an average of just 0.33 goals on the road. Therefore, I consider a draw at half-time followed by an away win after 90 minutes the most likely HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
Al HazmNeom SC
7Shots9
Al HazmNeom SC
3Shots on target3
Al HazmNeom SC
0.89xG1.13
Al HazmNeom SC
2Corners5
Al HazmNeom SC
31Dangerous attacks47
Al HazmNeom SC
13Fouls8
Al HazmNeom SC
3Cards0
Al HazmNeom SC

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.86
Al HazmNeom SC
1.29Goals conceded / match0.86
Al HazmNeom SC
45%Average possession52%
Al HazmNeom SC
3Shots on target / match4.43
Al HazmNeom SC

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.71Shots per match14
Al HazmNeom SC
3Shots on target4.43
Al HazmNeom SC
10.3%Shot conversion13.3%
Al HazmNeom SC
45%Possession52%
Al HazmNeom SC
1.14xG for1.49
Al HazmNeom SC
1.62xG against1.27
Al HazmNeom SC

Shooting quality

Al Hazm: BalancedNeom SC: Attacking
Al HazmNeom SC
Accuracy (shots on target)31%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Neom SC is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.8 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm
LDDWL
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.70BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Neom SC
LLWWW
Season result split
71% W0% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-0-2
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Neom SC is 86% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Al Hazm · 1.86 goals / match - Neom SC

Neom SC is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Al Hazm · 0.86 goals / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm scoring profile: strong

Al Hazm scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Neom SC scoring profile: strong

Neom SC scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while Al Hazm keeps a clean sheet in 29% (2 of 7 matches).

7Goals scored (season)13
Al HazmNeom SC
9Goals conceded (season)6
Al HazmNeom SC
2.29Average goals in match2.71
Al HazmNeom SC
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Al HazmNeom SC
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
Al HazmNeom SC
29%2 goals71%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%3 goals29%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%4 goals14%
Al HazmNeom SC

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal57%
Al HazmNeom SC
29%2 goals29%
Al HazmNeom SC
29%3 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%4 goals0%
Al HazmNeom SC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time14%
Al HazmNeom SC
14%BTTS in both halves14%
Al HazmNeom SC
14%Scored in both halves14%
Al HazmNeom SC

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Al HazmNeom SC
60%BTTS - last 520%
Al HazmNeom SC

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Al HazmNeom SC
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time57%
Al HazmNeom SC
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Al HazmNeom SC

2nd half

43%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Al HazmNeom SC
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
Al HazmNeom SC
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Al HazmNeom SC

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Neom SC is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Al Hazm · 1.71 pts / match - Neom SC

Al Hazm - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Neom SC - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.71
Al HazmNeom SC
0.71Goals scored (1st half)1.14
Al HazmNeom SC
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
Al HazmNeom SC
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.43
Al HazmNeom SC
57%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Al HazmNeom SC
43%No goal before half-time43%
Al HazmNeom SC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.86Points per match (2nd half)1.14
Al HazmNeom SC
0.29Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
Al HazmNeom SC
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Al HazmNeom SC
0.71Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Al HazmNeom SC
57%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Al HazmNeom SC
71%No goal after half-time71%
Al HazmNeom SC

Al Hazm - second-half results

0% W86% D14% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Neom SC - second-half results

29% W29% D43% L
12
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Hazm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match1.60.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+40
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hazm
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
3
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hazm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 43% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Al HazmLigaNeom SC
Average goals in match▼ 2.292.82▼ 2.71
Both teams scored▲ 57%47%▼ 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%56%▼ 43%
Clean sheets▼ 29%34%▲ 43%
Goal before half-time• 71%71%• 71%
Goal after half-time▼ 43%67%▲ 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+-4%
Home attack advantage
+-4%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Khalifah AldawsariOff: Amadou Koné
  2. Al HazmSubstitutionOn: Walead Al-shangeatiOff: Aboubacar Diakite
  3. Al HazmYellow cardSofiane Bendebka
  4. Al HazmYellow cardAbdurahman Al Dakheel
  5. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Abbas Sadiq AlhassanOff: Giorgos Masouras
  6. Neom SCSubstitutionOn: Mohammed Al BuraykOff: Valentín Vada

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Al Hazm 0 - 1 - 1 Neom SC. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

The Professional League match finished Al Hazm 1:1 Neom SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Al Hazm and Neom SC?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Al Hazm won 0, Neom SC won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

Al Hazm score 1.00 goals per game on average and Neom SC 1.86. The Professional League average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Al Hazm's matches and 29% of Neom SC's.

What form are Al Hazm and Neom SC in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hazm have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Neom SC 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hazm vs Neom SC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.