Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueSour StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hikma play Tadamon Sour in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match date is 13 April 2026 at 14:00. Venue: Sour Stadium.

Current form

Al Hikma: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tadamon Sour: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hikma scores 1.30 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Tadamon Sour scores 0.67 and concedes 1.08. League average: 2.44 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hikma 43%, Tadamon Sour 29%. Over 2.5: Al Hikma 52%, Tadamon Sour 29%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hikma has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.95. Al Hikma: 5.8 shots per match, Tadamon Sour: 5.3.

Match halves

Al Hikma: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.57. Tadamon Sour: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Al Hikma: 31-45+ (8 goals). Tadamon Sour: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.44 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.3Goals scored / match0.67
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.3Goals conceded / match1.08
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
45%Average possession43%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
3.3Shots on target / match2.83
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.78Shots per match5.29
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
3.3Shots on target2.83
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
22.6%Shot conversion12.6%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
45%Possession43%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.05xG for0.95
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.99xG against1.19
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Shooting quality

Al Hikma: Counter-attackingTadamon Sour: Counter-attacking
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
Accuracy (shots on target)57%53%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Hikma
LDWWL
Season result split
39% W13% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-11
1.30 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 0.83BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Tadamon Sour
LLWDW
Season result split
25% W33% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-10
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Hikma is 94% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Al Hikma · 0.67 goals / match - Tadamon Sour

Tadamon Sour is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Al Hikma · 1.08 goals / match - Tadamon Sour

Al Hikma scoring profile: mixed

Al Hikma scores in 70% of matches (16 of 23 matches), while Tadamon Sour keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 matches).

Tadamon Sour scoring profile: mixed

Tadamon Sour scores in 50% of matches (12 of 24 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).

30Goals scored (season)16
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
30Goals conceded (season)26
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
2.61Average goals in match1.75
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
11Goals scored (last 5)5
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal50%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
35%2 goals8%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
17%3 goals8%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
9%4 goals0%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal54%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
43%2 goals33%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
17%3 goals17%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
4%4 goals4%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
League average

Goal patterns

26%BTTS at half-time13%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
4%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
17%Scored in both halves8%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
60%BTTS - last 540%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time58%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Hikma is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Al Hikma · 1.04 pts / match - Tadamon Sour

Al Hikma - half-time state
30% leading39% draw30% trailing
Tadamon Sour - half-time state
17% leading54% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.04
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.29
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.35Average goals (1st half)0.79
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
57%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
52%No goal before half-time75%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1.13
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.26Average goals (2nd half)0.96
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
48%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
61%No goal after half-time67%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Al Hikma - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
30
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tadamon Sour - second-half results

21% W50% R29% P
25
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
Tadamon Sour - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.2
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
6
6
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tadamon Sour
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

Tadamon Sour

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al HikmaLigaTadamon Sour
Average goals in match 2.612.44 1.75
Both teams scored 43%33% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%43% 29%
Clean sheets 35%39% 46%
Goal before half-time 65%57% 50%
Goal after half-time 70%77% 58%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.44
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.10
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hikma 0 - 1 - 0 Tadamon Sour. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

When do Al Hikma and Tadamon Sour play?

Al Hikma face Tadamon Sour on 13 April 2026 in Lebanese Premier League at Sour Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour?

Al Hikma score 1.30 goals per game on average and Tadamon Sour 0.67. The Lebanese Premier League average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Al Hikma's matches and 29% of Tadamon Sour's.

What form are Al Hikma and Tadamon Sour in?

Over the last 5 games Al Hikma have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tadamon Sour 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour?

The statistical background for Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.