Lebanon - Lebanese Premier LeagueSour StadiumData current as of 07 September 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour: match statistics

Al Hikma vs Tadamon Sour: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Al Hikma play Tadamon Sour in Lebanese Premier League (Lebanon). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Sour Stadium.

Current form

Al Hikma: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tadamon Sour: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Al Hikma scores 1.24 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Tadamon Sour scores 0.58 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.39 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Al Hikma 43%, Tadamon Sour 26%. Over 2.5: Al Hikma 52%, Tadamon Sour 21%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Al Hikma has higher xG: 1.05 vs 0.82. Al Hikma: 5.8 shots per match, Tadamon Sour: 4.1.

Match halves

Al Hikma: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.43. Tadamon Sour: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

Al Hikma: 31-45+ (8 goals). Tadamon Sour: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Lebanese Premier League: 2.39 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.24Goals scored / match0.58
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.33Goals conceded / match0.95
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
45%Average possession41%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
3.24Shots on target / match2.05
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.76Shots per match4.11
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
3.24Shots on target2.05
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
21.5%Shot conversion14.1%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
45%Possession41%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.05xG for0.82
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.04xG against1.15
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Shooting quality

Al Hikma: Counter-attackingTadamon Sour: Counter-attacking
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
Accuracy (shots on target)56%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Al Hikma
LWLDW
Season result split
38% W14% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-10
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Tadamon Sour
DLWWL
Season result split
21% W37% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-5
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 0.88Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Hikma is 114% better for: goals scored per match.

1.24 goals / match - Al Hikma · 0.58 goals / match - Tadamon Sour

Tadamon Sour is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Al Hikma · 0.95 goals / match - Tadamon Sour

Al Hikma scoring profile: mixed

Al Hikma scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Tadamon Sour keeps a clean sheet in 47% (9 of 19 matches).

Tadamon Sour scoring profile: mixed

Tadamon Sour scores in 47% of matches (9 of 19 matches), while Al Hikma keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).

26Goals scored (season)11
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
28Goals conceded (season)18
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
2.57Average goals in match1.53
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
8Goals scored (last 5)2
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
7Goals conceded (last 5)2
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal47%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
33%2 goals5%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
14%3 goals5%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
5%4 goals0%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal53%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
48%2 goals32%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
19%3 goals11%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
5%4 goals0%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

34%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time11%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
5%BTTS in both halves0%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
19%Scored in both halves5%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS16%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
40%BTTS - last 50%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time53%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time53%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time21%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Hikma is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Al Hikma · 1 pts / match - Tadamon Sour

Al Hikma - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Tadamon Sour - half-time state
16% leading53% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.81Goals scored (1st half)0.26
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.48Average goals (1st half)0.79
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
52%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
48%No goal before half-time74%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.05
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
1.1Average goals (2nd half)0.74
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
52%Clean sheet after half-time63%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour
62%No goal after half-time74%
Al HikmaTadamon Sour

Al Hikma - second-half results

19% W43% R38% P
28
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tadamon Sour - second-half results

16% W58% R26% P
19
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Al Hikma - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.40
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+4-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
Tadamon Sour - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.20.6
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Al Hikma
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
3
16-30
8
6
31-45
1
3
46-60
6
5
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Tadamon Sour
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
5
31-45
2
0
46-60
3
1
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.05
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Al Hikma

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Tadamon Sour

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
53%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Lebanese Premier League).

Teams vs league

Al HikmaLigaTadamon Sour
Average goals in match 2.572.39 1.53
Both teams scored 43%34% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%43% 21%
Clean sheets 38%38% 47%
Goal before half-time 71%57% 53%
Goal after half-time 67%76% 53%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.39
Average goals per match
34%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.09
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Al Hikma 0 - 1 - 0 Tadamon Sour. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.