Al Jubail vs Al Draih: match statistics
Al Jubail vs Al Draih: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Al Jubail played Al Draih in First Division (Saudi Arabia). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Al Jubail: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Al Draih: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Al Jubail scores 0.80 and concedes 2.10 goals per match. Al Draih scores 2.33 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Al Jubail 47%, Al Draih 60%. Over 2.5: Al Jubail 57%, Al Draih 70%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Al Draih has higher xG: 1.94 vs 1.07. Al Jubail: 8.7 shots per match, Al Draih: 16.4.
Match halves
Al Jubail: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.40. Al Draih: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.30.
Goals by minute
Al Jubail: 0-15 (6 goals). Al Draih: 76-90+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 7.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Al Draih holds a clear advantage in form and efficiency: in the last 5 matches the visitors have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss and have scored 12 goals, whereas Al Jubail have lost all 5 recent matches and scored only 2 goals while conceding 13. Seasonal figures confirm this disparity — Al Draih have 70 goals this season versus Al Jubail's 24; the visitors average 1.93 goals on the road and have average xG for 1.84, while the hosts record 0.93 goals and xG for 1.24 at home. In chance creation Al Draih also leads: 15.47 average shots and 6.07 on target per match and 58% possession versus the hosts' 10.4 shots, 3.8 on target and 46% possession, translating into higher shooting efficiency (13% vs 9%). Al Jubail’s defense looks vulnerable to attacks — the hosts concede 1.73 goals at home on average and have xG against 1.56, while Al Draih allow 1.2 goals on the road and have xG against 1.16; the hosts fail to score in 40% of home matches, while the visitors fail to score in only 13%. Given the superiority in goals (70–24), better xG (1.84–1.24), dominance in shots and the hosts’ zero-point return in the last 5 matches, I forecast an Al Draih victory; probabilities: 80% away win, 12% draw and 8% home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally both teams have BTTS at 60% (Al Jubail 60% and Al Draih 60%), and the league average for matches with both teams scoring is 61%, which provides a strong seasonal signal for BTTS - Yes. xG and goal metrics also support chances for both sides: Al Jubail has a seasonal goals per game of 2.73 and xG 2.03, while Al Draih has 1.93 goals and xG 1.84; home xG 2.03 is higher than xG against the away side 1.16, and the away xG 1.84 is higher than xG against the home side 1.00, indicating both teams create scoring opportunities. However, the last 5 matches show form asymmetry: Al Jubail has only 40% BTTS, scores 0.4 and concedes 2.6 per game, whereas Al Draih has 80% BTTS, scores 2.4 and concedes 1.2, which strongly favors the visitors to score. Additionally, the home side averages 7.33 shots on target versus 6.07 for the away side, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals is 73% (home) and 67% (away), further increasing the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Considering the seasonal signals 60%/60%, the league 61% and Al Draih’s strong recent scoring form (12 goals in last 5 and xG 1.92), I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at 70% rather than 30% as the best pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project about 3.02 expected goals in the match: 1.60 for Al Jubail and 1.42 for Al Draih. The calculation is based on xG — Al Jubail averages 2.03 xG while the opponent concedes 1.16 xG (the average gives 1.60 for the hosts); Al Draih has 1.84 xG while Al Jubail concedes 1.00 xG (average 1.42 for the visitors). The total 3.02 exceeds the league average of 2.92 and aligns with very high percentages of matches over 1.5 goals: hosts 93% and visitors 87%; both teams also have BTTS in 60% of fixtures. Hosts average 7.33 shots on target per game versus 6.07 for the visitors and have a higher conversion rate (16% vs 13%), which further boosts scoring probability. As a result, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (selection “over” at the 1.5 line, forecast ~91%); Over 2.5 is solid (~72%) while Over 3.5 is much less certain (~47%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I choose the 2/2 scenario (Al Draih leads at the break and ultimately wins) because short-term form strongly favors the visitors. Seasonally Al Jubail has better numbers — on average 2.73 goals per match versus 1.93 for Al Draih, higher xG 2.03 vs 1.84 and more shots on target (7.33 vs 6.07) — however these advantages do not translate into recent results. In the last five matches the hosts lost all five (0% wins) and scored an average of 0.4 goals by half-time, while Al Draih has a 60% win rate in their last five and led at the break in 60% of those games. Additionally, in the short term second halves favor the visitors: average points in second halves over the last five matches are 2.2 for Al Draih versus 0.2 for Al Jubail, which suggests the visitors will hold or extend their lead after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Al Jubail | Al Draih | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Al Draih is 191% better for: goals scored per match.
0.8 goals / match - Al Jubail · 2.33 goals / match - Al Draih
Al Draih is 96% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.1 goals / match - Al Jubail · 1.07 goals / match - Al Draih
Al Jubail scores in 53% of matches (16 of 30 matches), while Al Draih keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).
Al Draih scores in 93% of matches (28 of 30 matches), while Al Jubail keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Al Jubail
Over / Under - Al Draih
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Al Draih is 125% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.77 pts / match - Al Jubail · 1.73 pts / match - Al Draih
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Al Jubail - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 10%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Al Draih - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -6 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (20 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Al Jubail
Al Draih
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Al Jubail | Liga | Al Draih | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.90 | 2.92 | ▲ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 47% | 61% | • 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 59% | ▲ 70% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 22% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | ▲ 87% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 77% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Al Jubail 0 - 0 - 1 Al Draih. Average goals 7.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Al Jubail vs Al Draih?
The First Division match finished Al Jubail 1:2 Al Draih. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Al Jubail vs Al Draih?
Al Jubail score 0.80 goals per game on average and Al Draih 2.33. The First Division average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Al Jubail's matches and 60% of Al Draih's.
What form are Al Jubail and Al Draih in?
Over the last 5 games Al Jubail have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Al Draih 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Al Jubail vs Al Draih?
The statistical background for Al Jubail vs Al Draih — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.