Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueData current as of 20 September 2026

Altay vs Kyzyl-Zhar: match statistics

Altay crest
Altay
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar

Altay vs Kyzyl-Zhar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Altay played Kyzyl-Zhar in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Altay: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Kyzyl-Zhar: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Altay scores 0.80 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.15 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.37 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Altay 50%, Kyzyl-Zhar 50%. Over 2.5: Altay 35%, Kyzyl-Zhar 55%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Altay has higher xG: 1.29 vs 1.20. Altay: 11.3 shots per match, Kyzyl-Zhar: 10.1.

Match halves

Altay: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.60. Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

Altay: 76-90+ (8 goals). Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.37 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Altay sit lower in the table, in 16th place, and have lost 4 of their last 5 matches, conceding as many as 15 goals during that run, which significantly undermines their credibility. Kyzyl-Zhar are 9th and have collected 7 points from their last five games, while their defence conceded only 6 goals in that period. However, the visitors’ main weakness is their away form: they score just 0.44 goals on average, have failed to find the net in 67% of such matches, and have lost 56% of their games away from home. Altay also have limited attacking efficiency at home, averaging 0.8 goals and drawing as many as 50% of their matches, despite creating chances worth an average of 1.30 xG. Given Kyzyl-Zhar’s low attacking potential away from home and Altay’s poor recent defensive form, a closely contested draw appears to be the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument against BTTS - Yes is Kyzyl-Zhar’s very poor attacking consistency: the team has averaged just 0.44 goals per match, while failing to score in 67% of its games this season. BTTS - Yes occurred in only 22% of the visitors’ matches, well below Altay’s 73% and the league average of 54%. Altay does have a very low 9% clean-sheet rate and conceded as many as 3.0 goals per match over the last five rounds, which increases the visitors’ scoring chances. Kyzyl-Zhar have recently improved to 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.41 per match, but their season conversion rate is only 5%, with 2.78 shots on target per game. The hosts should create chances against a visiting defence conceding an average of 1.22 goals, but it remains more likely that at least one team—primarily Kyzyl-Zhar—will fail to score. This supports BTTS - No, rather than automatically indicating a 0:0 draw or that neither team will score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals, as Kyzyl-Zhar have not recorded a single match with at least four goals, while Altay stayed below this line in 55% of matches. The visitors average only 0.44 goals per game and score at least once in just 33% of their appearances, which clearly limits the potential for a high-scoring game. Altay average 1.73 goals, but their current five-match xG average is only 0.90, while Kyzyl-Zhar keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches. The hosts’ last five games were indeed very open, conceding an average of 3.0 goals, but the visitors scored only 1.2 goals per game during this period. The projected 2.36 goals point more towards a total of two or three goals than the four goals required for the bet to lose.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an Altay win, as Kyzyl-Zhar were level at the break in 8 of their 9 away matches (89%) and scored just 0.00 goals per game during that period. Altay also tend to start cautiously, recording half-time draws in 64% of their home matches, but they average 1.18 goals after the interval. The hosts possess a clear attacking advantage: they register an average of 5.00 shots on target compared with the visitors’ 2.78, while their xG stands at 1.37 versus 0.99 for Kyzyl-Zhar. Kyzyl-Zhar concede an average of 1.11 goals after half-time, which supports the possibility of Altay breaking the deadlock in the second half. The risk remains significant, however, as Altay have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 3.0 goals in those games; therefore, draw outcomes and an away win still retain a meaningful share of the forecast.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
15Shots9
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
5Shots on target4
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
1.79xG1.55
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
8Corners6
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
69Dangerous attacks96
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
11Fouls13
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0Cards2
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.8Goals scored / match1.15
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
1.5Goals conceded / match1.4
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
42%Average possession43%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
4.1Shots on target / match4
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.35Shots per match10.1
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
4.1Shots on target4
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
7%Shot conversion11.4%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
42%Possession43%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
1.29xG for1.2
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
1.54xG against1.54
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

Shooting quality

Altay: BalancedKyzyl-Zhar: Balanced
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
Accuracy (shots on target)36%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.200.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Altay · 1.4 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Altay
WWLLL
Season result split
15% W35% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-10
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kyzyl-Zhar
LLDWW
Season result split
30% W20% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-10
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Altay · 1.15 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Kyzyl-Zhar is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Altay · 1.4 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Altay scoring profile: strong

Altay scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 matches).

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 60% of matches (12 of 20 matches), while Altay keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).

16Goals scored (season)23
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
30Goals conceded (season)28
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
2.3Average goals in match2.55
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
6Goals scored (last 5)6
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
12Goals conceded (last 5)6
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
15%2 goals35%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
5%3 goals15%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0%4 goals5%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal80%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
35%2 goals45%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
25%3 goals10%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
15%4 goals5%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time15%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0%Scored in both halves15%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
60%BTTS - last 560%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time35%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.65 pts / match - Altay · 1.05 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar

Altay - half-time state
5% leading50% draw45% trailing
Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
10% leading75% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.65Points per match (1st half)1.05
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.3
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0.9Average goals (1st half)0.65
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
45%Clean sheet before half-time70%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
80%No goal before half-time75%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.1
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)1.05
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.9
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
50%Clean sheet after half-time40%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar
60%No goal after half-time50%
AltayKyzyl-Zhar

Altay - second-half results

25% W45% D30% L
13
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.65
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

25% W35% D40% L
21
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Altay - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Altay
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
6
31-45
2
5
46-60
2
5
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
3
4
61-75
9
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Altay

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

AltayLigaKyzyl-Zhar
Average goals in match 2.302.37 2.55
Both teams scored 50%54% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%44% 55%
Clean sheets 25%28% 20%
Goal before half-time 60%65% 40%
Goal after half-time 65%70% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.37
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardStéphane Cédric Bahoken
  2. AltaySubstitutionOn: Elguja LobjanidzeOff: Dragan Stoisavljević
  3. Kyzyl-ZharGoalJóannes Bjartalíð
  4. AltaySubstitutionOn: Abylaykhan NazymkhanovOff: Jannur Kökeev
  5. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardEvgeny Makarenko
  6. AltaySubstitutionOn: Denis MitrofanovOff: Saif Popov
  7. AltaySubstitutionOn: Darko DodevOff: Ibragim Dadayev
  8. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Timur MuldinovOff: Stéphane Cédric Bahoken
  9. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Nedeljko PišćevićOff: Evgeny Makarenko
  10. AltaySubstitutionOn: Elisey GorshunovOff: Elguja Lobjanidze
  11. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Yuriy PertsukhOff: Oleksandr Noyok

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Altay 1 - 0 - 0 Kyzyl-Zhar. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Altay vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Altay 2:2 Kyzyl-Zhar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Altay vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

Altay score 0.80 goals per game on average and Kyzyl-Zhar 1.15. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.37 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Altay's matches and 50% of Kyzyl-Zhar's.

What form are Altay and Kyzyl-Zhar in?

Over the last 5 games Altay have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kyzyl-Zhar 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Altay vs Kyzyl-Zhar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.