Slovenia - PrvaLigaŠportni Park AluminijData current as of 03 September 2026

Aluminij vs Koper: match statistics

Aluminij crest
Aluminij
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Koper crest
Koper

Aluminij vs Koper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Aluminij played Koper in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 28 August 2026. Venue: Športni Park Aluminij. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Aluminij: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Koper: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Aluminij scores 1.60 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Koper scores 1.00 and concedes 0.83. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Aluminij 60%, Koper 33%. Over 2.5: Aluminij 40%, Koper 17%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 43%.

xG, shots and style

Koper has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.32. Aluminij: 10.8 shots per match, Koper: 12.2.

Match halves

Aluminij: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60. Koper: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Aluminij: 0-15 (3 goals). Koper: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 43%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-3. Average goals 3.25, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Aluminij are unbeaten at home, yet as many as 67% of their home matches have ended in draws; they average 1.67 goals scored and 1.00 conceded there. Koper have won 50% of their away matches and kept a clean sheet in 50%, while conceding an average of just 0.75 goals, which could limit the hosts’ attacking output. Aluminij nevertheless create slightly better chances, with an average xG of 1.45 compared with Koper’s 1.28, and register more shots on target per match: 4.0 to 2.5. The visitors enjoy greater possession, 56% compared with Aluminij’s 48%, but they have scored just 3 goals in their last five matches, while the hosts have netted 8. The combination of Koper’s solid defensive record and Aluminij’s strong tendency to draw at home points to the most likely outcome being a share of the points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Koper’s limited attacking efficiency: the team averages 1.0 goals per game this season, but only 0.6 across their last five matches. Koper have failed to score in 25% of their fixtures, kept a clean sheet in 50%, and BTTS has occurred in just 25% of their season matches, compared with 54% across the league. Aluminij have been more goal-oriented recently, scoring and conceding 1.6 goals per game across their last five outings, while Koper concede only 0.75 goals per game this season. The hosts create more chances, with a season xG of 1.95 and 4.0 shots on target per match, compared with Koper’s 1.28 xG and 2.5 shots on target, increasing the likelihood of Aluminij scoring but not guaranteeing a response from the visitors. The most likely scenario therefore remains one in which at least one team, particularly Koper, fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Koper have averaged 1.0 goals per match so far, while their tally has dropped to 0.6 goals per game across their last five fixtures. The visitors have not played a single match with more than 2.5 goals, and every one of their games has also stayed below 3.5 goals. Aluminij have recorded 1.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded per match in their last five outings, although their season conversion rate stands at just 6%, despite averaging 16 shots per game. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.95 xG, while Koper’s defence allows an average of 1.35 xG and has kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches. The estimated total of 2.35 goals, combined with the visitors’ low attacking output, clearly supports the Under 3.5 goals selection.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Aluminij have the clearer attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.95 compared with Koper’s 1.28, while the hosts average 16 shots and 4 on target, compared with the visitors’ 10.5 and 2.5, respectively. In their last five matches, Aluminij were leading at the break in two, whereas Koper did not lead at half-time in any of them and went into the interval behind in three of five. The visitors have also been highly ineffective before the break, failing to score a single goal in that period across their last five appearances, while the hosts averaged 1.0 goal. After half-time, both teams have averaged 1.2 goals over their last five matches, so the lead built by Aluminij before the break has a realistic chance of being maintained. The 1/1 pick is further supported by the hosts’ better recent form, with Aluminij winning 40% of their last five matches compared with Koper’s 20%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
AluminijKoper
3Shots8
AluminijKoper
1Shots on target2
AluminijKoper
0.75xG1.12
AluminijKoper
7Corners5
AluminijKoper
65Dangerous attacks64
AluminijKoper
15Fouls10
AluminijKoper
0Cards3
AluminijKoper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.6Goals scored / match1
AluminijKoper
1Goals conceded / match0.83
AluminijKoper
44%Average possession57%
AluminijKoper
3.4Shots on target / match3
AluminijKoper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.8Shots per match12.17
AluminijKoper
3.4Shots on target3
AluminijKoper
14.8%Shot conversion8.2%
AluminijKoper
44%Possession57%
AluminijKoper
1.32xG for1.49
AluminijKoper
1.44xG against1.41
AluminijKoper

Shooting quality

Aluminij: Counter-attackingKoper: Balanced
AluminijKoper
Accuracy (shots on target)31%25%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.470.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Aluminij is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Aluminij · 1.2 pts / match - Koper

Aluminij
DLDWW
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-0
Last 5 at home
1-2-0
DDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Koper
DDLDW
Season result split
33% W50% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Aluminij is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.6 goals / match - Aluminij · 1 goals / match - Koper

Koper is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Aluminij · 0.83 goals / match - Koper

Aluminij scoring profile: mixed

Aluminij scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Koper keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

Koper scoring profile: very strong

Koper scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Aluminij keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

8Goals scored (season)6
AluminijKoper
5Goals conceded (season)5
AluminijKoper
2.6Average goals in match1.83
AluminijKoper
8Goals scored (last 5)4
AluminijKoper
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
AluminijKoper

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal67%
AluminijKoper
40%2 goals33%
AluminijKoper
40%3 goals0%
AluminijKoper
20%4 goals0%
AluminijKoper

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal50%
AluminijKoper
20%2 goals33%
AluminijKoper
0%3 goals0%
AluminijKoper
0%4 goals0%
AluminijKoper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time0%
AluminijKoper
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AluminijKoper
20%Scored in both halves17%
AluminijKoper

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
AluminijKoper
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
AluminijKoper
60%BTTS - last 540%
AluminijKoper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
AluminijKoper
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
AluminijKoper
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AluminijKoper

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
AluminijKoper
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
AluminijKoper
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
AluminijKoper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Aluminij is 93% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / match - Aluminij · 0.83 pts / match - Koper

Aluminij - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Koper - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per match (1st half)0.83
AluminijKoper
1Goals scored (1st half)0.17
AluminijKoper
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
AluminijKoper
1.6Average goals (1st half)0.83
AluminijKoper
60%Clean sheet before half-time50%
AluminijKoper
40%No goal before half-time83%
AluminijKoper

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)2.17
AluminijKoper
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
AluminijKoper
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
AluminijKoper
1Average goals (2nd half)1
AluminijKoper
60%Clean sheet after half-time83%
AluminijKoper
80%No goal after half-time33%
AluminijKoper

Aluminij - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Koper - second-half results

67% W17% R17% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Aluminij - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Koper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.402.00
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Aluminij
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Koper
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
4
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.21
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+47%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Aluminij

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 38% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Koper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

AluminijLigaKoper
Average goals in match 2.602.57 1.83
Both teams scored 60%54% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%43% 17%
Clean sheets 20%27% 50%
Goal before half-time 60%79% 67%
Goal after half-time 60%86% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.32
Away goals / match
+-5%
Home attack advantage
+-6%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KoperYellow cardAndraž Ruedl
  2. KoperYellow cardNsana Simon
  3. KoperGoalLeo RimacAssist: Fran Tomek
  4. AluminijSubstitutionOn: Matic VrbanecOff: Petar Petriško
  5. KoperSubstitutionOn: Bangaly DiawaraOff: Fran Tomek
  6. AluminijSubstitutionOn: Ramsak RobertOff: Tomislav Jagić
  7. KoperYellow cardLuka Baš

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Aluminij 1 - 0 - 3 Koper. Average goals 3.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Aluminij vs Koper?

The PrvaLiga match finished Aluminij 0:1 Koper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Aluminij and Koper?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Aluminij won 1, Koper won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Aluminij vs Koper?

Aluminij score 1.60 goals per game on average and Koper 1.00. The PrvaLiga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Aluminij's matches and 33% of Koper's.

What form are Aluminij and Koper in?

Over the last 5 games Aluminij have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Koper 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Aluminij vs Koper?

The statistical background for Aluminij vs Koper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.