Andijan vs Nasaf: match statistics
Andijan vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Andijan played Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match was played on 20 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Soglom Avlod. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
Andijan: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Nasaf: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Andijan scores 1.24 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Nasaf scores 1.38 and concedes 0.95. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Andijan 33%, Nasaf 52%. Over 2.5: Andijan 57%, Nasaf 38%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Nasaf has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.47. Andijan: 11.9 shots per match, Nasaf: 13.3.
Match halves
Andijan: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.95. Nasaf: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Andijan: 76-90+ (12 goals). Nasaf: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Uzbekistan Super League: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Andijan have a clearly stronger home record: they win 55% of their matches, with just 9% ending in draws, while Nasaf win only 30% of their away fixtures and draw as many as 40% of them. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, averaging 1.60 xG compared with Nasaf’s 1.41, while their opponents are allowed an xG of 1.48. Andijan’s home defence concedes an average of 0.91 goals per match and keeps a clean sheet in 45% of appearances, whereas Nasaf have kept a clean sheet in only 10% of their away games. Recent form also slightly favours the hosts, who have collected 10 points from their last five matches through 3 wins and a draw, compared with Nasaf’s 6 points. Nasaf can be effective in attack, failing to score in only 20% of away fixtures, but Andijan’s advantage in game control, with 56% possession, and more reliable defence point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - No pick is primarily strengthened by Andijan’s very solid defence: the hosts concede just 0.82 goals per match on average and keep a clean sheet in 55% of their games. Nasaf score 1.30 goals per match this season, but BTTS has landed in only 20% of their last five matches, indicating frequent scenarios in which one side fails to score. Andijan also have a low seasonal BTTS rate of 36%, while in their last five matches they have scored and conceded 1.2 goals per game. The hosts should have a good chance of scoring, as Nasaf keep a clean sheet in only 10% of matches; however, the visitors’ xG of 1.41 compared with Andijan’s xG against of 1.23 does not provide a sufficiently strong argument for a Nasaf goal. Nasaf’s 70% seasonal BTTS rate points in the opposite direction, but current form and the hosts’ defensive strength more clearly support the outcome in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Andijan concede an average of just 0.82 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 55% of their matches, limiting Nasaf’s potential despite their average of 1.30 goals scored. Both teams have a very strong low-scoring profile at the 3.5 line: 82% of Andijan’s matches and 80% of Nasaf’s matches finished below it. The hosts score an average of 1.45 goals, while the visitors average 1.30, with only 18% and 20% of their matches respectively exceeding four goals. Recent form suggests some ability to create chances, as the five-match xG stands at 1.72 for Andijan and 1.54 for Nasaf, but the combined projection of 2.50 goals still clearly supports Under 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A half-time draw is the most likely outcome, as Andijan were level at the break in 73% of their matches, while Nasaf led at half-time in only 20%. The hosts concede just 0.18 goals per match before the interval and have kept a clean sheet in this period in 82% of their appearances, clearly limiting Nasaf’s chances of taking an early lead. After the break, Andijan score an average of 0.82 goals and have won the second half in 60% of their last five matches, compared with just 20% for Nasaf. The hosts’ advantage is also evident in their overall performance: their average xG is 1.73 versus 1.41 for the visitors, while they average 5.91 shots on target compared with Nasaf’s 4.20. Andijan have also won 45% of their matches this season, compared with 30% for Nasaf, making the HT/FT draw/home win scenario the strongest selection.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Andijan | Nasaf | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Andijan is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Andijan · 1.2 pts / match - Nasaf
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nasaf is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Andijan · 1.38 goals / match - Nasaf
Nasaf is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.14 goals / match - Andijan · 0.95 goals / match - Nasaf
Andijan scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).
Nasaf scores in 76% of matches (16 of 21 matches), while Andijan keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Andijan
Over / Under - Nasaf
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Andijan - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Nasaf - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Andijan
Nasaf
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Andijan | Liga | Nasaf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.38 | 2.67 | ▼ 2.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 57% | 53% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 26% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 48% | 68% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 90% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Andijan 0 - 2 - 1 Nasaf. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Andijan vs Nasaf?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Andijan 1:4 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Andijan and Nasaf?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Andijan won 0, Nasaf won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Andijan vs Nasaf?
Andijan score 1.24 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.38. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Andijan's matches and 52% of Nasaf's.
What form are Andijan and Nasaf in?
Over the last 5 games Andijan have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Nasaf 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Andijan vs Nasaf?
The statistical background for Andijan vs Nasaf — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


