South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 13 September 2026

Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Ansan Greeners crest
Ansan Greeners
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ansan Greeners played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Ansan Greeners: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ansan Greeners scores 1.43 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.86 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ansan Greeners 86%, Seoul E-Land 57%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 57%, Seoul E-Land 71%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.20. Ansan Greeners: 9.4 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 12.3.

Match halves

Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (3 goals). Seoul E-Land: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Seoul E-Land are clear favorites for this fixture: they sit 3rd in the table with a season record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, while Ansan Greeners are 11th with 2 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses. Offensive and defensive differentials are significant — the away side score 1.75 goals per away match and concede 1.00, whereas the home team score 1.00 at home and concede 2.25; average xG are 1.38 for Seoul versus 1.18 for Ansan, and xG against 1.63 vs 2.06. Seoul create more chances (on average 11.75 shots and 5.0 on target per away game) with a conversion rate of 15%, while Ansan register 8.75 shots and 3.75 on target with an 11% conversion, translating to 11 goals for Seoul in the last 5 matches versus 5 for Ansan and 3 away wins in that period compared to 1 home win. Ansan’s home issues are pronounced: no home wins yet (0% home wins), 75% of home matches lost, 0% clean sheets and a negative home goal difference of -5, indicating defensive fragility and a higher likelihood of opponent goals. Considering superior chance volume, higher efficiency and an average of 2 points in Seoul’s last 5 matches versus 1 point for Ansan, I forecast an away win at 65% probability, 20% for a draw and 15% for the home side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonally Ansan has BTTS at 33% versus Seoul's 75%, but in the last 5 matches Ansan recorded BTTS at 80% while Seoul at 60%. In their last 5 fixtures Ansan scored 5 and conceded 7 (avg 1.0 scored and 1.4 conceded), whereas Seoul scored 11 and conceded 5 (avg 2.2 scored and 1.0 conceded), which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. Seasonally Ansan has 67% clean sheets at home, but recent xG against Ansan is 2.00 with xG for 0.99, so recently they have allowed significantly more high-quality chances. Seasonal shot statistics are similar (avg 13.0 vs 11.75 shots and 5.33 vs 5.0 on target) with the same conversion rate of 15%, meaning the created situations have a real chance to be converted. Considering Seoul's 75% seasonal BTTS, Ansan's 80% BTTS in the last 5, and Seoul's recent 2.2 goals and 2.00 xG against Ansan, I assess BTTS 'Yes' at 78% versus 22% 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected xG in this match is 1.58 for Ansan and 1.24 for Seoul, totaling 2.82, which already exceeds the 2.5 line. Season-to-date over 2.5 percentages are 67% for Ansan and 75% for Seoul, versus a league average of 59%, confirming both teams’ propensity for multi-goal matches. In their last 5 matches Seoul scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) and had 80% of games over 2.5, while Ansan scored 5 goals in their last 5 (1.0 avg) with 40% over 2.5, giving the visitors an offensive edge. Additionally, Ansan averages 13 shots and 5.33 on target per match, and Seoul 11.75 and 5.0 on target, with a 15% conversion rate for both, which increases the likelihood of chances being converted. Considering the combined xG of 2.82 and the high season over-2.5 shares (67% and 75%), the best line to play is Over 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ansan Greeners led at the break in 3 of 3 home matches (100%) and average 1.0 goals by half-time with 0.0 conceded, which strongly indicates a home lead after 45 minutes. The hosts win 67% of home games and score an average of 2.0 goals per match, with an xG of 1.52 versus the visitors’ 1.38 xG, while opponents concede an average of 1.63 xG, supporting Ansan’s advantage in the final outcome. Although the away side record both teams to score in 75% of their away matches and have a good run over the last 5 games (3 wins, 60% win rate), the hosts have 67% clean sheets at home, so the risk of conceding is balanced. On that basis the strongest HT/FT scenario is a home lead at half-time and a home victory at full-time (1/1), and I assign the highest probability to this outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
6Shots12
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0Shots on target5
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.57xG1.46
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1Corners2
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
26Dangerous attacks49
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
7Fouls14
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1Cards4
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.43Goals scored / match1.86
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.57Goals conceded / match1
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
43%Average possession48%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
4.29Shots on target / match5.14
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.43Shots per match12.29
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
4.29Shots on target5.14
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
15.2%Shot conversion15.1%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
43%Possession48%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.2xG for1.44
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
2.12xG against1.4
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Ansan Greeners: Counter-attackingSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)45%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners
LDDLW
Season result split
29% W29% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 at home
0-1-3
LLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.99Opponent xG: 2.14BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Seoul E-Land
LDWWW
Season result split
57% W14% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-2
1.86 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
LDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.43 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.86 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Seoul E-Land is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners scoring profile: very strong

Ansan Greeners scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

10Goals scored (season)13
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
11Goals conceded (season)7
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
3Average goals in match2.86
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
5Goals scored (last 5)11
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal86%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
14%2 goals57%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
14%3 goals43%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
14%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal57%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
43%2 goals29%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
29%3 goals14%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

43%BTTS at half-time43%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0%Scored in both halves57%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS57%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
80%BTTS - last 560%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

2nd half

43%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
43%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Seoul E-Land is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 2.14 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
57% leading43% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)2.14
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.71Goals scored (1st half)1
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.57Average goals (1st half)1.43
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
29%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
29%No goal before half-time14%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.57
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
71%Clean sheet after half-time71%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land
71%No goal after half-time43%
Ansan GreenersSeoul E-Land

Ansan Greeners - second-half results

14% W57% D29% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

43% W29% D29% L
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ansan Greeners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.80.6
1 goal100%20%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ansan Greeners
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
3
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
86%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ansan Greeners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.92
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Ansan GreenersLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 3.002.82 2.86
Both teams scored 86%63% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 57%58% 71%
Clean sheets 14%22% 43%
Goal before half-time 100%82% 86%
Goal after half-time 43%72% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.35
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defence advantage
+-5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Seoul E-LandYellow cardChang-Hwan Park
  2. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Dong-Hyun KangOff: Ho-jin Jin
  3. Seoul E-LandYellow cardJi-Ung Baek
  4. Ansan GreenersGoalJi-Min Im
  5. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Jun-Hyeok ParkOff: Hyun-Soo Jang
  6. Seoul E-LandGoalGyung-Jun ByeonAssist: Jae-Yong Park
  7. Ansan GreenersSubstitutionOn: Kyu-Min ParkOff: Ji-Min Im
  8. Ansan GreenersYellow cardDan Choi
  9. Seoul E-LandSubstitutionOn: Seo-Joon BaeOff: Hyeok-Chan Son
  10. Seoul E-LandYellow cardSeo-Joon Bae
  11. Seoul E-LandYellow cardIn-pyo Oh

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 0 - 2 - 1 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Seoul E-Land FC
6 : 0
Ansan Greeners FC
Ansan Greeners FC
2 : 2
Seoul E-Land FC
Seoul E-Land FC
1 : 1
Ansan Greeners FC

FAQ

What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 0:2 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Seoul E-Land?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 0, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?

Ansan Greeners score 1.43 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.86. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 57% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Ansan Greeners and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.