Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics
Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ansan Greeners played Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Ansan Greeners: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ansan Greeners scores 1.43 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.86 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ansan Greeners 86%, Seoul E-Land 57%. Over 2.5: Ansan Greeners 57%, Seoul E-Land 71%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.20. Ansan Greeners: 9.4 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 12.3.
Match halves
Ansan Greeners: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.86.
Goals by minute
Ansan Greeners: 31-45+ (3 goals). Seoul E-Land: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 2: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seoul E-Land are clear favorites for this fixture: they sit 3rd in the table with a season record of 4 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, while Ansan Greeners are 11th with 2 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses. Offensive and defensive differentials are significant — the away side score 1.75 goals per away match and concede 1.00, whereas the home team score 1.00 at home and concede 2.25; average xG are 1.38 for Seoul versus 1.18 for Ansan, and xG against 1.63 vs 2.06. Seoul create more chances (on average 11.75 shots and 5.0 on target per away game) with a conversion rate of 15%, while Ansan register 8.75 shots and 3.75 on target with an 11% conversion, translating to 11 goals for Seoul in the last 5 matches versus 5 for Ansan and 3 away wins in that period compared to 1 home win. Ansan’s home issues are pronounced: no home wins yet (0% home wins), 75% of home matches lost, 0% clean sheets and a negative home goal difference of -5, indicating defensive fragility and a higher likelihood of opponent goals. Considering superior chance volume, higher efficiency and an average of 2 points in Seoul’s last 5 matches versus 1 point for Ansan, I forecast an away win at 65% probability, 20% for a draw and 15% for the home side.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally Ansan has BTTS at 33% versus Seoul's 75%, but in the last 5 matches Ansan recorded BTTS at 80% while Seoul at 60%. In their last 5 fixtures Ansan scored 5 and conceded 7 (avg 1.0 scored and 1.4 conceded), whereas Seoul scored 11 and conceded 5 (avg 2.2 scored and 1.0 conceded), which increases the likelihood of goal exchange. Seasonally Ansan has 67% clean sheets at home, but recent xG against Ansan is 2.00 with xG for 0.99, so recently they have allowed significantly more high-quality chances. Seasonal shot statistics are similar (avg 13.0 vs 11.75 shots and 5.33 vs 5.0 on target) with the same conversion rate of 15%, meaning the created situations have a real chance to be converted. Considering Seoul's 75% seasonal BTTS, Ansan's 80% BTTS in the last 5, and Seoul's recent 2.2 goals and 2.00 xG against Ansan, I assess BTTS 'Yes' at 78% versus 22% 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected xG in this match is 1.58 for Ansan and 1.24 for Seoul, totaling 2.82, which already exceeds the 2.5 line. Season-to-date over 2.5 percentages are 67% for Ansan and 75% for Seoul, versus a league average of 59%, confirming both teams’ propensity for multi-goal matches. In their last 5 matches Seoul scored 11 goals (2.2 avg) and had 80% of games over 2.5, while Ansan scored 5 goals in their last 5 (1.0 avg) with 40% over 2.5, giving the visitors an offensive edge. Additionally, Ansan averages 13 shots and 5.33 on target per match, and Seoul 11.75 and 5.0 on target, with a 15% conversion rate for both, which increases the likelihood of chances being converted. Considering the combined xG of 2.82 and the high season over-2.5 shares (67% and 75%), the best line to play is Over 2.5 goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Ansan Greeners led at the break in 3 of 3 home matches (100%) and average 1.0 goals by half-time with 0.0 conceded, which strongly indicates a home lead after 45 minutes. The hosts win 67% of home games and score an average of 2.0 goals per match, with an xG of 1.52 versus the visitors’ 1.38 xG, while opponents concede an average of 1.63 xG, supporting Ansan’s advantage in the final outcome. Although the away side record both teams to score in 75% of their away matches and have a good run over the last 5 games (3 wins, 60% win rate), the hosts have 67% clean sheets at home, so the risk of conceding is balanced. On that basis the strongest HT/FT scenario is a home lead at half-time and a home victory at full-time (1/1), and I assign the highest probability to this outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ansan Greeners | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Seoul E-Land is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.43 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1.86 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Seoul E-Land is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.57 goals / match - Ansan Greeners · 1 goals / match - Seoul E-Land
Ansan Greeners scores in 100% of matches (7 of 7 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 43% (3 of 7 matches).
Seoul E-Land scores in 86% of matches (6 of 7 matches), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / match - Ansan Greeners · 2.14 pts / match - Seoul E-Land
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 57%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ansan Greeners
Seoul E-Land
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Ansan Greeners | Liga | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.82 | • 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 86% | 63% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 57% | 58% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 22% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 43% | 72% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Ansan Greeners 0 - 2 - 1 Seoul E-Land. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?
The K League 2 match finished Ansan Greeners 0:2 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ansan Greeners and Seoul E-Land?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Ansan Greeners won 0, Seoul E-Land won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?
Ansan Greeners score 1.43 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.86. The K League 2 average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 86% of Ansan Greeners's matches and 57% of Seoul E-Land's.
What form are Ansan Greeners and Seoul E-Land in?
Over the last 5 games Ansan Greeners have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ansan Greeners vs Seoul E-Land?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


