Anyang vs Gwangju: match statistics
Anyang vs Gwangju: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Anyang play Gwangju in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 19 July 2026 at 12:30. Venue: Anyang Stadium. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Anyang: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Gwangju: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Anyang scores 1.37 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Gwangju scores 0.53 and concedes 2.26. League average: 2.31 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Anyang 74%, Gwangju 37%. Over 2.5: Anyang 37%, Gwangju 47%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Anyang has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.03. Anyang: 9.7 shots per match, Gwangju: 8.1.
Match halves
Anyang: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Gwangju: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.37.
Goals by minute
Anyang: 46-60 (6 goals). Gwangju: 46-60 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
5 H2H matches: 1-1-3. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 60%.
Match description
I predict an Anyang win (1): the hosts average 1.13 goals per home match, while Gwangju manage only 0.25 goals on the road. Defensively the visitors are weak — Gwangju concede 2.88 goals per away match and have 41 goals conceded this season, whereas Anyang concede 1.38 at home and only 19 in total. Chance creation and efficiency favor Anyang: hosts average 9.13 shots and 3.0 on target per game with a 12% conversion, versus Gwangju’s 7.5 shots, 1.88 on target and just 3% conversion; the visitors fail to score in 75% of away matches. In the last 5 matches Anyang scored 8 goals and average 1.6 points per game, while Gwangju have 1 goal and 0.4 points; combined with the xG differential (1.15 vs 0.94 in favor of Anyang and xG against 1.43 vs 1.71) this confirms the home-side advantage.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Anyang | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Anyang is 233% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Anyang · 0.6 pts / match - Gwangju
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Anyang is 158% better for: goals scored per match.
1.37 goals / match - Anyang · 0.53 goals / match - Gwangju
Anyang is 95% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.16 goals / match - Anyang · 2.26 goals / match - Gwangju
Anyang scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Gwangju keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
Gwangju scores in 37% of matches (7 of 19 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Anyang
Over / Under — Gwangju
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Anyang is 177% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Anyang · 0.53 pts / match - Gwangju
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Anyang - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gwangju - second-half results
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Anyang
Gwangju
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Anyang | Liga | Gwangju | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.53 | 2.31 | ▲ 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 51% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 39% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 30% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 63% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 73% | • 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Anyang 1 - 1 - 3 Gwangju. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Anyang vs Gwangju?
The K League 1 match finished Anyang 1:1 Gwangju. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Anyang and Gwangju?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Anyang won 1, Gwangju won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Anyang vs Gwangju?
Anyang score 1.37 goals per game on average and Gwangju 0.53. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Anyang's matches and 37% of Gwangju's.
What form are Anyang and Gwangju in?
Over the last 5 games Anyang have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Gwangju 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Anyang vs Gwangju?
The statistical background for Anyang vs Gwangju — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.