South Korea - K League 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Anyang vs Sangju Sangmu: match statistics

Anyang crest
Anyang
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu

Anyang vs Sangju Sangmu: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Anyang play Sangju Sangmu in K League 1 (South Korea). The match date is 13 May 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Anyang: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Sangju Sangmu: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Anyang scores 1.37 and concedes 1.16 goals per match. Sangju Sangmu scores 0.95 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.31 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Anyang 74%, Sangju Sangmu 68%. Over 2.5: Anyang 37%, Sangju Sangmu 32%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Sangju Sangmu has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.27. Anyang: 9.7 shots per match, Sangju Sangmu: 12.4.

Match halves

Anyang: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79. Sangju Sangmu: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Anyang: 46-60 (6 goals). Sangju Sangmu: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 1: 2.31 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 1-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.

Match description

I back the away win: Sangju Sangmu shows a clear edge in away attacking metrics — averaging 1.33 goals per match and 3.5 shots on target with a 13% conversion rate, versus Anyang’s home output of 0.83 goals, 2.67 SOT and 9% conversion. The visitors also register higher away xG (1.27 vs 1.15) and greater possession (54% vs 45%), indicating they generate more high-quality chances; additionally Sangju has 33% clean sheets away while Anyang has 0% clean sheets at home. Conversely, Anyang holds a better season points tally (16 vs 13) and overall have scored 15 and conceded 13, whereas Sangju sit at 13–18, showing the hosts are hard to beat over the long run. Both teams display similar short-term form (7 goals scored in the last 5 matches and PPG 1.2), but Sangju have conceded 10 in that span versus the hosts’ 5, so the game may be open and high-scoring. Considering Sangju’s superior efficiency, better chance-creation metrics and favorable away-stat differentials, I assign a higher probability to the away win, with a material risk of a draw given both teams’ high draw rate (50%) at the respective venues.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
AnyangSangju Sangmu
9Shots18
AnyangSangju Sangmu
3Shots on target5
AnyangSangju Sangmu
1.11xG2
AnyangSangju Sangmu
1Corners3
AnyangSangju Sangmu
45Dangerous attacks72
AnyangSangju Sangmu
10Fouls9
AnyangSangju Sangmu
2Cards1
AnyangSangju Sangmu

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AnyangSangju Sangmu
1.37Goals scored / match0.95
AnyangSangju Sangmu
1.16Goals conceded / match1.37
AnyangSangju Sangmu
43%Average possession57%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
3.95Shots on target / match3.53
AnyangSangju Sangmu

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.74Shots per match12.37
AnyangSangju Sangmu
3.95Shots on target3.53
AnyangSangju Sangmu
14.1%Shot conversion7.7%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
43%Possession57%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
1.27xG for1.48
AnyangSangju Sangmu
1.72xG against1.35
AnyangSangju Sangmu

Shooting quality

Anyang: Counter-attackingSangju Sangmu: Balanced
AnyangSangju Sangmu
Accuracy (shots on target)41%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Anyang is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Anyang · 0.6 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu

Anyang
WLWDW
Season result split
32% W47% R21% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-4
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-5-3
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 2.03BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Sangju Sangmu
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W58% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-11-6
0.89 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.32BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.37 goals / match - Anyang · 0.95 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu

Anyang is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.16 goals / match - Anyang · 1.37 goals / match - Sangju Sangmu

Anyang scoring profile: very strong

Anyang scores in 84% of matches (16 of 19 matches), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 matches).

26Goals scored (season)18
AnyangSangju Sangmu
22Goals conceded (season)26
AnyangSangju Sangmu
2.53Average goals in match2.32
AnyangSangju Sangmu
9Goals scored (last 5)3
AnyangSangju Sangmu
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
AnyangSangju Sangmu

How often they score at least...

84%1 goal74%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
32%2 goals16%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
11%3 goals5%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
5%4 goals0%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal89%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
26%2 goals37%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
5%3 goals11%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0%4 goals0%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

51%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time16%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
11%BTTS in both halves5%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
26%Scored in both halves11%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
80%BTTS - last 560%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Anyang is 32% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Anyang · 1.11 pts / match - Sangju Sangmu

Anyang - half-time state
26% leading68% draw5% trailing
Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
21% leading47% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.11
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.37
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0.26Goals conceded (1st half)0.68
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0.84Average goals (1st half)1.05
AnyangSangju Sangmu
74%Clean sheet before half-time53%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
53%No goal before half-time63%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

After half-time (2nd half)

1.11Points per match (2nd half)1.11
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
AnyangSangju Sangmu
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)0.68
AnyangSangju Sangmu
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.26
AnyangSangju Sangmu
26%Clean sheet after half-time32%
AnyangSangju Sangmu
37%No goal after half-time53%
AnyangSangju Sangmu

Anyang - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
28
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

21% W47% R32% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding52%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Anyang - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+20
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Sangju Sangmu - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
3
46-60
3
7
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
2
16-30
1
8
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
71%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.66
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
126%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

AnyangLigaSangju Sangmu
Average goals in match 2.532.31 2.32
Both teams scored 74%51% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%39% 32%
Clean sheets 16%30% 11%
Goal before half-time 53%63% 68%
Goal after half-time 84%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.31
Average goals per match
51%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-12%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Anyang 1 - 1 - 2 Sangju Sangmu. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.

Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1
Anyang
FC Anyang
4 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
1 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
1 : 3
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC

FAQ

What was the result of Anyang vs Sangju Sangmu?

The K League 1 match finished Anyang 2:2 Sangju Sangmu. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Anyang and Sangju Sangmu?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Anyang won 1, Sangju Sangmu won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Anyang vs Sangju Sangmu?

Anyang score 1.37 goals per game on average and Sangju Sangmu 0.95. The K League 1 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Anyang's matches and 68% of Sangju Sangmu's.

What form are Anyang and Sangju Sangmu in?

Over the last 5 games Anyang have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Sangju Sangmu 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Anyang vs Sangju Sangmu?

The statistical background for Anyang vs Sangju Sangmu — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.