Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of 06 September 2026

Araz vs Zira: match statistics

Araz crest
Araz
3 : 2half-time 2:0
Zira crest
Zira

Araz vs Zira: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Araz played Zira in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

Araz: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Zira: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Araz scores 1.31 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Zira scores 1.28 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Araz 56%, Zira 56%. Over 2.5: Araz 56%, Zira 41%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Zira has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.24. Araz: 9.6 shots per match, Zira: 10.3.

Match halves

Araz: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.78. Zira: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.69.

Goals by minute

Araz: 31-45+ (12 goals). Zira: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premyer Liqası: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (Zira): they are 5th, Araz 6th, and Zira conceded 33 goals this season vs Araz’s 55 — a 22-goal differential. Attacking output is similar (Araz 42 goals vs Zira 41), but in the last 5 matches Araz have only 4 goals and a 1-1-3 record (0.8 points per game), while Zira scored 5 and are 2-2-1 (1.6 points per game). In terms of chance quality, Araz at home have average xG 1.42 with xG against 1.48 (diff -0.06), whereas Zira away have xG 1.21 with xG against 1.18 (diff +0.03), so the visitors hold a slight edge in expected chances. Araz attempt more shots at home (avg 11.25 shots and 3.69 on target), but Zira are more efficient (shot conversion 13% away vs 11% for Araz) and are less likely to finish blank (matches without a goal 27% vs 31%). Considering the 22-goal defensive gap and Zira’s superior form over the last five, I give the visitors the higher probability of winning.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators favor both teams scoring: Araz has BTTS at 59%, Zira 53%, both above the league average of 45%. Both teams also generate chances — Araz averages xG 1.48 and 11.18 shots with 4.12 on target, Zira averages xG 1.21 with 9.33 shots and 3.47 on target, providing realistic opportunities for goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches Araz scored 0.8 and conceded 1.4 on average, while Zira scored 1.0 and conceded 0.8, so short-term Araz is more prone to conceding and Zira is effective at converting opportunities. Clean sheets occur moderately for them (41% and 33%), and shot conversion rates are 12% and 13%, so the risk of a Goal/Goal outcome is higher than a No Goal scenario. Based on this I assign BTTS - Yes 65% versus 35% for No and recommend a bet on both teams to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of approximately 2.47 goals: 1.33 for Araz and 1.14 for Zira, calculated as the average of each team’s xG_for and the opponent’s xG_against (Araz: (1.48+1.18)/2=1.33; Zira: (1.21+1.07)/2=1.14). Seasonal stats show Araz matches finished over 1.5 goals in 65% of cases and Zira in 73% — the average gives about a 69% probability for Over 1.5. Over 2.5 looks less likely: seasonal Over 2.5 is 41% (Araz) and 40% (Zira), and the projected combined xG of 2.47 is slightly below the 2.5 threshold, so I assess Over 2.5 at ~41%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (29% for Araz and 20% for Zira, average ~25%), therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5, also supported by Araz’s higher shot volume (11.18 vs 9.33) and shots on target (4.12 vs 3.47).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is the 1/1 scenario: Araz led at the break in 35% of matches, and their season win rate is 41% with a higher xG of 1.48 versus Zira’s 1.21, suggesting that the home side’s lead at half-time often translates into a full-time victory. A half-time draw occurs for the home team in 47% of games, and full-time draws occur for Araz in 47% and for Zira in 40%, so the X/X option is a strong alternative. Zira has clearly better second-half metrics — 1.53 points on average in second halves and 40% wins in second halves — which increases the probability of a turnaround after the break. Additionally, Araz keep a clean sheet at half-time in 65% of matches and concede an average of 0.47 goals before the break, which is why the 1/1 scenario received the highest probability at 28%, with X/X at 24% and 2/2 at 11%. Considering xG, pre-/post-half statistics and recent form (Araz 20% wins in the last 5 vs Zira 40%), I pick 1/1 as the best bet.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
ArazZira
7Shots19
ArazZira
4Shots on target8
ArazZira
1.05xG2.47
ArazZira
4Corners7
ArazZira
45Dangerous attacks100
ArazZira
12Fouls4
ArazZira
1Cards2
ArazZira

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.31Goals scored / match1.28
ArazZira
1.72Goals conceded / match1.03
ArazZira
55%Average possession57%
ArazZira
3.41Shots on target / match3.81
ArazZira

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.63Shots per match10.31
ArazZira
3.41Shots on target3.81
ArazZira
13.6%Shot conversion12.4%
ArazZira
55%Possession57%
ArazZira
1.24xG for1.35
ArazZira
1.52xG against1.12
ArazZira

Shooting quality

Araz: Efficient finishingZira: Balanced
ArazZira
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Zira is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Araz · 1.8 pts / match - Zira

Araz
LDLLW
Season result split
41% W19% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-13
1.41 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-6
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Zira
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
41% W44% R16% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-14-5
1.66 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-3
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Zira is 67% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - Araz · 1.03 goals / match - Zira

Araz scoring profile: strong

Araz scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Zira keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

Zira scoring profile: very strong

Zira scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Araz keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

42Goals scored (season)41
ArazZira
55Goals conceded (season)33
ArazZira
3.03Average goals in match2.31
ArazZira
4Goals scored (last 5)5
ArazZira
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
ArazZira

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal81%
ArazZira
47%2 goals31%
ArazZira
3%3 goals9%
ArazZira
0%4 goals3%
ArazZira

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal63%
ArazZira
41%2 goals31%
ArazZira
25%3 goals9%
ArazZira
19%4 goals0%
ArazZira

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time19%
ArazZira
6%BTTS in both halves6%
ArazZira
25%Scored in both halves16%
ArazZira

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
ArazZira
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
ArazZira
40%BTTS - last 560%
ArazZira

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
ArazZira
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
ArazZira
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
ArazZira

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
ArazZira
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
ArazZira
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
ArazZira

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Zira is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - Araz · 1.44 pts / match - Zira

Araz - half-time state
31% leading34% draw34% trailing
Zira - half-time state
34% leading41% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.44
ArazZira
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.59
ArazZira
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
ArazZira
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.16
ArazZira
50%Clean sheet before half-time56%
ArazZira
56%No goal before half-time56%
ArazZira

After half-time (2nd half)

1.34Points per match (2nd half)1.47
ArazZira
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.69
ArazZira
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
ArazZira
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.16
ArazZira
41%Clean sheet after half-time63%
ArazZira
38%No goal after half-time47%
ArazZira

Araz - second-half results

34% W31% R34% P
41
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Zira - second-half results

34% W44% R22% P
46
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Araz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Zira - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Araz
ScoredConceded
2
8
0-15
3
7
16-30
12
9
31-45
7
7
46-60
7
9
61-75
11
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Zira
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
4
11
16-30
12
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
7
7
61-75
14
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Araz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Zira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

ArazLigaZira
Average goals in match 3.032.57 2.31
Both teams scored 56%45% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%48% 41%
Clean sheets 25%32% 38%
Goal before half-time 78%65% 69%
Goal after half-time 91%74% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+-1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ArazYellow cardRahil Məmmədov
  2. ZiraYellow cardBrahim Konaté
  3. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Qismət AlıyevOff: Rovlan Muradov
  4. ZiraSubstitutionOn: Eren AydınOff: Davit Volkovi
  5. ArazSubstitutionOn: Charles BoliOff: Ömər Buludov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Araz 0 - 1 - 1 Zira. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Araz FK
0 : 1
Zira IK
Zira IK
1 : 1
Araz FK

FAQ

What was the result of Araz vs Zira?

The Premyer Liqası match finished Araz 3:2 Zira. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Araz and Zira?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Araz won 0, Zira won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Araz vs Zira?

Araz score 1.31 goals per game on average and Zira 1.28. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Araz's matches and 56% of Zira's.

What form are Araz and Zira in?

Over the last 5 games Araz have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Zira 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Araz vs Zira?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Araz vs Zira: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.