Ethiopia - Ethiopia Premier LeagueArba Minch StadiumData current as of 08 September 2026

Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: match statistics

Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Arba Minch Kenema played Shire Endaselassie in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 15 June 2026. Venue: Arba Minch Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Arba Minch Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Shire Endaselassie: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Shire Endaselassie scores 0.62 and concedes 0.82. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Arba Minch Kenema 44%, Shire Endaselassie 29%. Over 2.5: Arba Minch Kenema 29%, Shire Endaselassie 18%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Arba Minch Kenema has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.93. Arba Minch Kenema: 7.0 shots per match, Shire Endaselassie: 5.2.

Match halves

Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.41. Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.26.

Goals by minute

Arba Minch Kenema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ethiopia Premier League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw: both teams exhibit very low attacking efficiency and a high draw rate — Arba Minch has not won at home (Win% at home 0%) and records 41% draws at their stadium, while Shire has 47% draws on the road. Hosts score an average of 0.59 goals in home matches and concede 1.59, whereas visitors score 0.53 goals away and concede only 1.00, indicating a low-scoring game with better defensive organization from Shire. In terms of chance quality Arba generates slightly more xG and shots: xG at home 1.06 versus 0.93 xG for the visitors and 6.63 average shots vs 5.18, but the conversion rate is low (9% vs 10%) and rarely translates into more goals. In the last 5 matches Arba scored 6 goals with an average of 1.4 points per game, and Shire 3 goals with 1.6 points per game, so form slightly favors the visitors but is not decisive. Considering the hosts’ lack of home wins, the visitors’ superior defensive metrics (1.00 goals conceded away, 35% clean sheets) and the high incidence of draws, a split of the points is the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Season figures indicate a low probability of BTTS: both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 29%, while the league average is 41%. Arba Minch scores 0.71 goals per game, Shire 0.53, and the home side have kept a clean sheet in 47% of matches versus 35% for away, increasing the likelihood of No Goal. In the last 5 matches Arba had BTTS in 40% (2/5) and Shire in 20% (1/5), with average goals of 1.2 and 0.6 respectively, so single-goal outcomes dominate. xG shows 0.93 for each side, but xG against is 1.26 (home) and 1.22 (away), and shot conversion is only 13% and 10%, so actual goals are rarer than xG suggests. In light of these data I pick 'No' with a probability of 75% versus 25% for 'BTTS - Yes'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I accounted for recent form and xG: in the last 5 matches Arba has an average xG of 0.83, Shire 0.78 (combined 1.61 xG), with Arba scoring 6 goals in five matches (1.2 per match) and Shire 3 goals (0.6 per match). Seasonal goal averages are lower: Arba scores 0.71 goals per match, Shire 0.53 (sum 1.24), and both teams have only 18% of matches over 2.5 goals and 29% BTTS, indicating a limited scoring environment. A conservative Poisson model with lambdas 0.83 and 0.78 yields roughly a 48% probability for Over 1.5, 22% for Over 2.5 and 8% for Over 3.5 (i.e. Under 1.5 52%, Under 2.5 78%, Under 3.5 92%). Additionally, Arba has 47% clean sheets this season, Shire 35%, and the league average is only 1.78 goals/match; despite Arba’s higher conversion rate (13% vs 10%) the signals favor a low-scoring game. Consequently the best betting value is Under 2.5 — season-to-date under 2.5 is 82% for both teams combined, and our Poisson projection indicates about a 78% chance of Under 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X) — I assigned it a 31% probability. Draws at the break occur frequently: the home side were level at half in 7 of 17 matches (41%) and the away side in 12 of 17 (71%), yielding an average 56% rate of half-time draws. The first half is low-scoring — both home and away average 0.71 goals by the break, and clean sheets at half occur in 76% of home matches and 65% of away matches, so 0-0 is a reasonable half-time score. The second half may bring more action in favor of the hosts: the home team averages 1.41 points per match versus 0.82 for the visitors and score 0.71 goals at home on average compared to 0.53 for the away side, hence the X/1 and 1/1 scenarios each received 20%. An away win is least likely — the visitors won only 12% of matches, so combinations with their victory were assigned lower shares (2/2 9%, 2/X 4%, 2/1 2%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
11Shots12
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2Shots on target6
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.08xG1.59
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3Corners5
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
33Dangerous attacks56
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
19Fouls10
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0Cards0
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.79Goals scored / match0.62
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.21Goals conceded / match0.82
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
49%Average possession46%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2.29Shots on target / match2.06
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.97Shots per match5.24
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2.29Shots on target2.06
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
11.4%Shot conversion11.8%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
49%Possession46%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.1xG for0.93
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.18xG against1.24
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Shooting quality

Arba Minch Kenema: BalancedShire Endaselassie: Balanced
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
Accuracy (shots on target)33%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.18
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shire Endaselassie is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.6 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema
WLDLW
Season result split
18% W41% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-14-14
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-7-10
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.83Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Shire Endaselassie
WLWDD
Season result split
24% W41% R35% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-14-12
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-8-7
Last 5 away
0-4-1
DDDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.78Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Arba Minch Kenema is 27% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.62 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Shire Endaselassie is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.82 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema scoring profile: mixed

Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 41% (14 of 34 matches).

Shire Endaselassie scoring profile: mixed

Shire Endaselassie scores in 47% of matches (16 of 34 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

27Goals scored (season)21
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
41Goals conceded (season)28
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
2Average goals in match1.44
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal47%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
26%2 goals12%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%3 goals3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0%4 goals0%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal59%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
29%2 goals15%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
18%3 goals6%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%4 goals3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

44%
Arba Minch Kenema - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 34 matches
29%
Shire Endaselassie - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 34 matches
41%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time12%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%BTTS in both halves0%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
15%Scored in both halves9%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
40%BTTS - last 520%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time47%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time3%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shire Endaselassie is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.26 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema - half-time state
21% leading38% draw41% trailing
Shire Endaselassie - half-time state
24% leading56% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.26
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.35
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.35
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
1.03Average goals (1st half)0.71
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
53%Clean sheet before half-time71%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
68%No goal before half-time68%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per match (2nd half)1.06
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.26
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
0.97Average goals (2nd half)0.74
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
59%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie
65%No goal after half-time76%
Arba Minch KenemaShire Endaselassie

Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results

18% W59% R24% P
34
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding86%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 18%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Shire Endaselassie - second-half results

15% W62% R24% P
43
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Arba Minch Kenema - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Shire Endaselassie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Arba Minch Kenema
ScoredConceded
3
8
0-15
4
8
16-30
6
6
31-45
5
7
46-60
2
4
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Shire Endaselassie
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
3
8
31-45
4
5
46-60
1
4
61-75
4
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.72
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
25%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
25%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Arba Minch Kenema

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Shire Endaselassie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).

Teams vs league

Arba Minch KenemaLigaShire Endaselassie
Average goals in match 2.001.79 1.44
Both teams scored 44%41% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%28% 18%
Clean sheets 29%40% 41%
Goal before half-time 68%55% 50%
Goal after half-time 56%59% 47%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / match
0.88
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Arba Minch Kenema 0 - 0 - 1 Shire Endaselassie. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Arba Minch Kenema 2:0 Shire Endaselassie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

Arba Minch Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Shire Endaselassie 0.62. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Arba Minch Kenema's matches and 29% of Shire Endaselassie's.

What form are Arba Minch Kenema and Shire Endaselassie in?

Over the last 5 games Arba Minch Kenema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Shire Endaselassie 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.