Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: match statistics
Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Arba Minch Kenema played Shire Endaselassie in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 15 June 2026. Venue: Arba Minch Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Arba Minch Kenema: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Shire Endaselassie: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Arba Minch Kenema scores 0.79 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Shire Endaselassie scores 0.62 and concedes 0.82. League average: 1.79 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Arba Minch Kenema 44%, Shire Endaselassie 29%. Over 2.5: Arba Minch Kenema 29%, Shire Endaselassie 18%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Arba Minch Kenema has higher xG: 1.10 vs 0.93. Arba Minch Kenema: 7.0 shots per match, Shire Endaselassie: 5.2.
Match halves
Arba Minch Kenema: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.41. Shire Endaselassie: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.26.
Goals by minute
Arba Minch Kenema: 76-90+ (7 goals). Shire Endaselassie: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw: both teams exhibit very low attacking efficiency and a high draw rate — Arba Minch has not won at home (Win% at home 0%) and records 41% draws at their stadium, while Shire has 47% draws on the road. Hosts score an average of 0.59 goals in home matches and concede 1.59, whereas visitors score 0.53 goals away and concede only 1.00, indicating a low-scoring game with better defensive organization from Shire. In terms of chance quality Arba generates slightly more xG and shots: xG at home 1.06 versus 0.93 xG for the visitors and 6.63 average shots vs 5.18, but the conversion rate is low (9% vs 10%) and rarely translates into more goals. In the last 5 matches Arba scored 6 goals with an average of 1.4 points per game, and Shire 3 goals with 1.6 points per game, so form slightly favors the visitors but is not decisive. Considering the hosts’ lack of home wins, the visitors’ superior defensive metrics (1.00 goals conceded away, 35% clean sheets) and the high incidence of draws, a split of the points is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season figures indicate a low probability of BTTS: both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 29%, while the league average is 41%. Arba Minch scores 0.71 goals per game, Shire 0.53, and the home side have kept a clean sheet in 47% of matches versus 35% for away, increasing the likelihood of No Goal. In the last 5 matches Arba had BTTS in 40% (2/5) and Shire in 20% (1/5), with average goals of 1.2 and 0.6 respectively, so single-goal outcomes dominate. xG shows 0.93 for each side, but xG against is 1.26 (home) and 1.22 (away), and shot conversion is only 13% and 10%, so actual goals are rarer than xG suggests. In light of these data I pick 'No' with a probability of 75% versus 25% for 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I accounted for recent form and xG: in the last 5 matches Arba has an average xG of 0.83, Shire 0.78 (combined 1.61 xG), with Arba scoring 6 goals in five matches (1.2 per match) and Shire 3 goals (0.6 per match). Seasonal goal averages are lower: Arba scores 0.71 goals per match, Shire 0.53 (sum 1.24), and both teams have only 18% of matches over 2.5 goals and 29% BTTS, indicating a limited scoring environment. A conservative Poisson model with lambdas 0.83 and 0.78 yields roughly a 48% probability for Over 1.5, 22% for Over 2.5 and 8% for Over 3.5 (i.e. Under 1.5 52%, Under 2.5 78%, Under 3.5 92%). Additionally, Arba has 47% clean sheets this season, Shire 35%, and the league average is only 1.78 goals/match; despite Arba’s higher conversion rate (13% vs 10%) the signals favor a low-scoring game. Consequently the best betting value is Under 2.5 — season-to-date under 2.5 is 82% for both teams combined, and our Poisson projection indicates about a 78% chance of Under 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X) — I assigned it a 31% probability. Draws at the break occur frequently: the home side were level at half in 7 of 17 matches (41%) and the away side in 12 of 17 (71%), yielding an average 56% rate of half-time draws. The first half is low-scoring — both home and away average 0.71 goals by the break, and clean sheets at half occur in 76% of home matches and 65% of away matches, so 0-0 is a reasonable half-time score. The second half may bring more action in favor of the hosts: the home team averages 1.41 points per match versus 0.82 for the visitors and score 0.71 goals at home on average compared to 0.53 for the away side, hence the X/1 and 1/1 scenarios each received 20%. An away win is least likely — the visitors won only 12% of matches, so combinations with their victory were assigned lower shares (2/2 9%, 2/X 4%, 2/1 2%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Arba Minch Kenema | Shire Endaselassie | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Shire Endaselassie is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.6 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Arba Minch Kenema is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
0.79 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.62 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie
Shire Endaselassie is 48% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 0.82 goals / match - Shire Endaselassie
Arba Minch Kenema scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Shire Endaselassie keeps a clean sheet in 41% (14 of 34 matches).
Shire Endaselassie scores in 47% of matches (16 of 34 matches), while Arba Minch Kenema keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Arba Minch Kenema
Over / Under - Shire Endaselassie
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shire Endaselassie is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Arba Minch Kenema · 1.26 pts / match - Shire Endaselassie
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Arba Minch Kenema - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 18%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Shire Endaselassie - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Arba Minch Kenema
Shire Endaselassie
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Arba Minch Kenema | Liga | Shire Endaselassie | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.00 | 1.79 | ▼ 1.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 44% | 41% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 29% | 28% | ▼ 18% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 40% | • 41% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 68% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 59% | ▼ 47% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Arba Minch Kenema 0 - 0 - 1 Shire Endaselassie. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Arba Minch Kenema 2:0 Shire Endaselassie. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?
Arba Minch Kenema score 0.79 goals per game on average and Shire Endaselassie 0.62. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Arba Minch Kenema's matches and 29% of Shire Endaselassie's.
What form are Arba Minch Kenema and Shire Endaselassie in?
Over the last 5 games Arba Minch Kenema have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Shire Endaselassie 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Arba Minch Kenema vs Shire Endaselassie?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


