AS Eupen vs Olympic Charleroi: match statistics
AS Eupen vs Olympic Charleroi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
AS Eupen played Olympic Charleroi in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 21 December 2025. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
AS Eupen: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Olympic Charleroi: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
AS Eupen scores 1.41 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Olympic Charleroi scores 0.82 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: AS Eupen 53%, Olympic Charleroi 47%. Over 2.5: AS Eupen 47%, Olympic Charleroi 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Olympic Charleroi has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.09. AS Eupen: 9.0 shots per match, Olympic Charleroi: 11.2.
Match halves
AS Eupen: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
AS Eupen: 31-45+ (6 goals). Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| AS Eupen | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.21 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AS Eupen is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - AS Eupen · 1 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AS Eupen is 72% better for: goals scored per match.
1.41 goals / match - AS Eupen · 0.82 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
AS Eupen is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - AS Eupen · 2 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi
AS Eupen scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
Olympic Charleroi scores in 53% of matches (9 of 17 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 41% (7 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - AS Eupen
Over / Under - Olympic Charleroi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AS Eupen is 90% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / match - AS Eupen · 0.71 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
AS Eupen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Olympic Charleroi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 12%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
AS Eupen
Olympic Charleroi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| AS Eupen | Liga | Olympic Charleroi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.41 | 2.75 | • 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | • 53% | 53% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 50% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 41% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 73% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 79% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: AS Eupen 1 - 0 - 0 Olympic Charleroi. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of AS Eupen vs Olympic Charleroi?
The First Division B match finished AS Eupen 2:2 Olympic Charleroi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before AS Eupen vs Olympic Charleroi?
AS Eupen score 1.41 goals per game on average and Olympic Charleroi 0.82. The First Division B average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 53% of AS Eupen's matches and 47% of Olympic Charleroi's.
What form are AS Eupen and Olympic Charleroi in?
Over the last 5 games AS Eupen have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Olympic Charleroi 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AS Eupen vs Olympic Charleroi?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.