Asteras Tripolis vs Larissa: match statistics
Asteras Tripolis vs Larissa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Asteras Tripolis played Larissa in Super League (Greece). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Asteras Tripolis: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Larissa: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Asteras Tripolis scores 0.85 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Larissa scores 0.85 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Asteras Tripolis 46%, Larissa 50%. Over 2.5: Asteras Tripolis 46%, Larissa 35%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Larissa has higher xG: 1.20 vs 1.09. Asteras Tripolis: 9.4 shots per match, Larissa: 11.0.
Match halves
Asteras Tripolis: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.46. Larissa: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Asteras Tripolis: 76-90+ (6 goals). Larissa: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Asteras Tripolis holds a slight edge due to superior efficiency — they score 1.23 goals per game at home versus Larissa’s 0.77 on the road, with the home side’s conversion rate at 13% compared to 8% for the visitors. Both teams generate a similar number of chances by xG: Asteras posts 1.14 xG at home, Larissa 1.11 xG away, although the visitors register slightly more shots on target (3.54 vs 3.23) and more shots overall (10 vs 9.54). Form favors Larissa — the visitors average 0.6 points over the last 5 matches, while Asteras averages only 0.2; in their last five fixtures Asteras scored 3 and conceded 8, whereas Larissa scored 2 and conceded 6. Defensively the goals-against figures are comparable (Asteras 1.46 at home vs Larissa 1.38 away), but Larissa concedes significantly higher expected goals against (1.8 xG against vs 1.38 for Asteras), indicating a higher risk of defensive mistakes. Considering Asteras’s superior home efficiency (lower share of matches without a goal 31% vs 46% for Larissa) and the hosts’ poorer recent run, I forecast a narrow home victory, with a substantial probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics slightly favor BTTS: Asteras at home has BTTS in 62% of matches, while Larissa away only 38%, with the last 5 fixtures showing 60% and 40% respectively. Hosts score on average 0.92 goals per game and concede 1.62, visitors score 0.77 and concede 1.38, indicating both teams are more prone to conceding than scoring heavily. xG shows an advantage for Asteras: hosts have xG 1.30 versus xG against Larissa 1.80, and Larissa has xG 1.11 versus xG against Asteras 1.34, suggesting higher chance for the home side to create chances. However, low finishing (conversion 8%) and moderate shots on target (4.0 vs 3.54) and only 3 and 2 goals scored in the last 5 matches weaken BTTS confidence. In summary, due to a solid home BTTS signal and high xG against Larissa I assign 60% to 'yes' and 40% to 'no', so I recommend the BTTS = yes bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal statistics strongly indicate Over 1.5: Asteras’ home matches finished over 1.5 goals in 77% of cases, and Larissa’s away matches also in 77%, providing a consistent historical signal. xG stands at 1.30 for Asteras and 1.11 for Larissa, while Larissa’s defense concedes xG 1.80 versus 1.34 for Asteras; a simple average of these values yields expected goals of 1.55 for the home team and 1.23 for the away team (total 2.78). Asteras averages 12.0 shots with 4.0 on target, Larissa 10.0 with 3.54 on target, with a conversion rate of 8% — a realistic goal-scoring potential. Higher lines are less convincing: Over 2.5 appears in 31% of Asteras matches and 38% of Larissa matches (roughly 35% on average), and Over 3.5 only in 23%/8% (about 16% average). Admittedly, in the last 5 matches Asteras scored 3 goals (0.6 avg) and Larissa 2 goals (0.4 avg), but BTTS for the home side is 62% versus 38% for the away side, which increases the chance of at least one goal from each side. Therefore I recommend an Over 1.5 bet as the strongest signal: the historic 77% and total xG 2.78 give a clear edge to this option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics indicate a strong propensity for draws: Asteras has drawn 46% of matches this season, Larissa 38%, averaging approximately 42% of matches finishing level. Draws at the break are also common — Asteras was level at half-time in 38% of fixtures, Larissa in 31% (average ~34%), therefore HT=X is likely. In the first half both teams score little: Asteras 0.38 goals HT, Larissa 0.31 goals HT, with average conceded 1.00 and 0.69 goals HT respectively, which favors low-scoring draws. xG shows parity: hosts 1.30 xG versus 1.11 for the visitors, while Larissa concedes 1.80 xG to opponents, so there is no clear advantage guaranteeing a win; additionally both teams have 0% wins in their last five matches, hence HT/FT "X/X" is the strongest signal from the data.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Asteras Tripolis | Larissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Larissa is 200% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Asteras Tripolis · 0.6 pts / match - Larissa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Larissa is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.58 goals / match - Asteras Tripolis · 1.5 goals / match - Larissa
Asteras Tripolis scores in 58% of matches (15 of 26 matches), while Larissa keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).
Larissa scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Asteras Tripolis keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Asteras Tripolis
Over / Under - Larissa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Asteras Tripolis is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.88 pts / match - Asteras Tripolis · 0.69 pts / match - Larissa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Asteras Tripolis - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 12%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Larissa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Asteras Tripolis
Larissa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Asteras Tripolis | Liga | Larissa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.55 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | • 46% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 49% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 31% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 74% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Asteras Tripolis 0 - 2 - 0 Larissa. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Asteras Tripolis vs Larissa?
The Super League match finished Asteras Tripolis 3:1 Larissa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Asteras Tripolis and Larissa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Asteras Tripolis won 0, Larissa won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Asteras Tripolis vs Larissa?
Asteras Tripolis score 0.85 goals per game on average and Larissa 0.85. The Super League average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Asteras Tripolis's matches and 50% of Larissa's.
What form are Asteras Tripolis and Larissa in?
Over the last 5 games Asteras Tripolis have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Larissa 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Asteras Tripolis vs Larissa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


