Athletic Club Boise vs Forward Madison: match statistics
Athletic Club Boise vs Forward Madison: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Athletic Club Boise played Forward Madison in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Athletic Club Boise: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Forward Madison: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Athletic Club Boise scores 1.45 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Forward Madison scores 2.12 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.88 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Athletic Club Boise 60%, Forward Madison 53%. Over 2.5: Athletic Club Boise 60%, Forward Madison 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.
xG, shots and style
Athletic Club Boise has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.57. Athletic Club Boise: 13.9 shots per match, Forward Madison: 13.3.
Match halves
Athletic Club Boise: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.85. Forward Madison: half-time lead 71%, second-half goals 0.88.
Goals by minute
Athletic Club Boise: 0-15 (6 goals). Forward Madison: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.88 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 59%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Athletic Club Boise have significantly stronger home metrics: they average 1.45 goals with an xG of 1.82, while Forward Madison score just 1.11 goals away from home and generate 1.17 xG. The hosts also dominate chance creation, averaging 16.18 shots and 4.82 shots on target per match, compared with 9.11 shots and 3.33 on target for the visitors. Boise’s home defence concedes an average of 1.00 goal, with opponents recording 1.14 xG, whereas Madison concede 1.22 goals away from home with an xG against of 1.50. However, the visitors are in excellent form, having won their last 5 matches and scored 18 goals in that run, which significantly improves their chances of taking points. Despite this streak, home advantage, Boise’s 55% home win rate and Madison’s weaker away record, including a negative goal difference, marginally favour the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Athletic Club Boise have very strong attacking potential at home, scoring an average of 3.25 goals with an xG of 2.01, while Forward Madison concede an average of 1.22 goals away from home and allow opponents an xG of 1.50. The visitors are also in excellent scoring form: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 3.6 goals, with an xG of 1.89. During the same period, Boise conceded an average of 1.0 goal and allowed opponents an xG of 1.46, giving Madison a genuine basis for finding the net. Both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of their last five matches, while Boise’s season rate of 63% is above the league average of 55%. The main risk to the pick is that Boise have kept a clean sheet in 38% of their home matches, but the visitors’ attacking form and Madison’s weaker away defence provide stronger support for the BTTS - Yes scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Athletic Club Boise have very strong attacking numbers at home: they average 3.25 goals scored, create 2.01 xG, and record 6.75 shots on target per match. Forward Madison have scored as many as 18 goals in their last five games, averaging 3.6, while their average xG over that period stands at 1.89. At least two goals were scored in all of Boise’s matches and in 56% of Forward Madison’s games, while the league itself averages 2.89 goals per match. The hosts concede just 0.75 goals on average, but the visitors are on a five-match winning streak, and their current attacking efficiency increases the likelihood of contributing to the total. Over 1.5 is the strongest selection, as the projected 3.20 goals provide a clear margin above this line, even if the match is less efficient in front of goal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Athletic Club Boise have posted very strong numbers throughout the season: they win 88% of their matches, score an average of 3.25 goals, and concede just 0.75, while Forward Madison average 1.11 goals scored. The hosts’ superiority before the break is particularly pronounced, as they have led at half-time in all 8 of their matches, scoring an average of 1.63 goals before the break and conceding just 0.25. Boise also create significantly more chances, as reflected by their xG of 2.01 compared with 1.17, as well as averages of 18 shots and 6.75 shots on target, versus the opponents’ 9.11 shots and 3.33 on target. However, Forward Madison are currently enjoying an excellent run of five consecutive wins and have averaged 3.6 goals across their last five matches, meaning turnaround scenarios or an away win still retain significant probability. Despite this form, the most likely outcome remains Boise leading at the break and maintaining their advantage until the final whistle, supported by their perfect first-half record and a 75% win rate after half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Athletic Club Boise | Forward Madison | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Forward Madison is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise · 3 pts / match - Forward Madison
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Forward Madison is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1.45 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise · 2.12 goals / match - Forward Madison
Forward Madison is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Athletic Club Boise · 1 goals / match - Forward Madison
Athletic Club Boise scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Forward Madison keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).
Forward Madison scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Athletic Club Boise keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Athletic Club Boise
Over / Under - Forward Madison
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Forward Madison is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Athletic Club Boise · 2.24 pts / match - Forward Madison
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Athletic Club Boise - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Forward Madison - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 71% of matches and wins 65%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 0% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Athletic Club Boise
Forward Madison
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Athletic Club Boise | Liga | Forward Madison | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.85 | 2.88 | ▲ 3.12 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 55% | ▼ 53% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 60% | 59% | • 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 69% | ▲ 94% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 78% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Athletic Club Boise 0 - 0 - 1 Forward Madison. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Athletic Club Boise vs Forward Madison?
The USL League One match finished Athletic Club Boise 2:1 Forward Madison. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Athletic Club Boise vs Forward Madison?
Athletic Club Boise score 1.45 goals per game on average and Forward Madison 2.12. The USL League One average is 2.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Athletic Club Boise's matches and 53% of Forward Madison's.
What form are Athletic Club Boise and Forward Madison in?
Over the last 5 games Athletic Club Boise have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Forward Madison 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Athletic Club Boise vs Forward Madison?
The statistical background for Athletic Club Boise vs Forward Madison — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


