United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 31 August 2026

Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics

Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Atlanta United II played Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 18 August 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Atlanta United II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Chicago Fire II: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Atlanta United II scores 2.05 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Chicago Fire II scores 2.00 and concedes 1.59. League average: 3.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Atlanta United II 59%, Chicago Fire II 68%. Over 2.5: Atlanta United II 68%, Chicago Fire II 82%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Atlanta United II has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.60. Atlanta United II: 16.3 shots per match, Chicago Fire II: 13.0.

Match halves

Atlanta United II: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 1.23. Chicago Fire II: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

Atlanta United II: 76-90+ (10 goals). Chicago Fire II: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.27 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-0. Average goals 4.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Atlanta United II have a clear home advantage: they win 60% of their home matches and average 2.7 goals scored there, while Chicago Fire II win only 18% of their away games. The hosts create more high-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.95 compared with Chicago’s 1.43, while also registering 17.4 shots and 6.4 on target per match, compared with 12.09 and 4.64 for the visitors. Neither defence is particularly solid, with Atlanta conceding 1.7 goals per home game and Chicago 1.73 away from home, which supports the prospect of both teams scoring. The visitors are in good recent form, having scored 19 goals in their last five matches and won three of them, but their away record and 45% loss rate on the road favour the hosts. Atlanta should be able to capitalise on their greater attacking intensity and superior chance quality, although Chicago’s scoring form reduces confidence in this selection.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS signal is clear, as Chicago Fire II had both teams score in 82% of their matches this season, compared with 60% for Atlanta United II. The visitors kept a clean sheet in only 9% of their games and concede an average of 1.73 goals, while Atlanta score as many as 2.5 goals per home match. Chicago are currently highly effective in attack: they have scored 19 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 3.8, while Atlanta conceded 1.8 goals over the same period. Both sides also create a solid number of chances, with an average xG of 1.80 for the hosts and 1.43 for the visitors, alongside xGA of 1.43 and 1.55 respectively. The high rates of matches featuring at least three goals—90% for Atlanta and 82% for Chicago—further support an open game in which both teams should find the back of the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Atlanta United II score an average of 2.5 goals per game, while Chicago Fire II concede 1.73, clearly supporting the hosts’ high-scoring potential. The visitors are equally offensive in their current form: they have scored 19 goals in their last five matches, averaging 3.8 per game, with an average xG of 1.93. The 1.5-goal line was surpassed in 90% of Atlanta’s matches and 91% of Chicago’s, while both teams average 14.1 and 12.09 shots, respectively. An additional argument is Chicago’s very low clean-sheet rate, at just 9%, making Over 1.5 the strongest and safest signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Atlanta United II were leading at half-time in 6 of their 10 matches, compared with just 3 of Chicago Fire II’s 11, while the hosts average 1.50 goals before the break against 0.82 for their opponents. Atlanta’s advantage over the full season is also clear: they win 60% of their matches and average 2.50 goals, compared with Chicago’s 18% win rate and 1.55 goals per game. The hosts also create better chances, as reflected by an average xG of 1.80 versus 1.43 and a shot conversion rate of 18% compared with the visitors’ 13%. However, Chicago are in excellent recent form, scoring 3.8 goals per game across their last five appearances, so turnaround scenarios or a visitors’ win after the break still retain a significant probability. The strongest individual HT/FT outcome remains 1/1, as Atlanta more often imposes itself from the outset, while Chicago’s weak defence concedes an average of 1.73 goals per match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
17Shots18
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
8Shots on target6
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
1.99xG2.12
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
3Corners5
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
50Dangerous attacks79
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
18Fouls8
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
3Cards2
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
2.05Goals scored / match2
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
1.64Goals conceded / match1.59
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
52%Average possession51%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
6.05Shots on target / match4.82
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.32Shots per match13
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
6.05Shots on target4.82
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
12.5%Shot conversion15.4%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
52%Possession51%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
1.88xG for1.6
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
1.44xG against1.48
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

Shooting quality

Atlanta United II: AttackingChicago Fire II: Efficient finishing
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
Accuracy (shots on target)37%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Chicago Fire II is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Atlanta United II · 1.8 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Atlanta United II
LWDLL
Season result split
45% W18% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-8
1.55 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire II
LWWLW
Season result split
41% W23% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-8
1.45 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Atlanta United II scoring profile: very strong

Atlanta United II scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 matches).

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire II scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Atlanta United II keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

45Goals scored (season)44
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
36Goals conceded (season)35
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
3.68Average goals in match3.59
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
7Goals scored (last 5)18
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal82%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
59%2 goals59%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
41%3 goals27%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
18%4 goals14%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal77%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
55%2 goals55%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
23%3 goals23%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
5%4 goals5%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

59%
Atlanta United II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 22 matches
61%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time32%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
9%BTTS in both halves18%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
36%Scored in both halves50%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
60%BTTS - last 580%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time55%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time91%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time64%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.59 pts / match - Atlanta United II · 1.68 pts / match - Chicago Fire II

Atlanta United II - half-time state
45% leading23% draw32% trailing
Chicago Fire II - half-time state
45% leading32% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)1.68
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
0.82Goals scored (1st half)1.14
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.77
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
55%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
41%No goal before half-time32%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.36Points per match (2nd half)1.32
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
1.23Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.95
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
2.14Average goals (2nd half)1.82
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
36%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II
45%No goal after half-time36%
Atlanta United IIChicago Fire II

Atlanta United II - second-half results

36% W27% R36% P
35
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

32% W36% R32% P
37
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.68
PPG before half-time
Lead holding91%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Atlanta United II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Chicago Fire II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.00
Goals scored / match2.01.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match3.22.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals80%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+4+4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 10

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Atlanta United II
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
7
1
16-30
6
7
31-45
9
8
46-60
8
6
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
6
2
16-30
13
7
31-45
9
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Atlanta United II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.11
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
140%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Atlanta United IILigaChicago Fire II
Average goals in match 3.683.27 3.59
Both teams scored 59%61% 68%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%66% 82%
Clean sheets 18%22% 23%
Goal before half-time 86%76% 82%
Goal after half-time 91%84% 91%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.27
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.84
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Atlanta United IIGoalArif KovacAssist: Cameron Dunbar
  2. Atlanta United IIGoalEnzo DovloAssist: Andrew Jardines
  3. Chicago Fire IISubstitutionOn: Dean BoltzOff: Vitaliy Hlyut
  4. Chicago Fire IISubstitutionOn: Chase NagleOff: Christopher Cupps
  5. Atlanta United IISubstitutionOn: Ignacio Suarez-CouriOff: Santiago Pita
  6. Atlanta United IISubstitutionOn: Toto MajubOff: Mohamed Larabi Cisset
  7. Atlanta United IIYellow cardIgnacio Suarez-Couri
  8. Chicago Fire IIAssistRichard Fleming
  9. Chicago Fire IIRed cardDamian Nigg
  10. Atlanta United IIRed cardEnzo Dovlo

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Atlanta United II 3 - 0 - 0 Chicago Fire II. Average goals 4.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Atlanta United II
3 : 0
Chicago Fire II
Chicago Fire II
0 : 3
Atlanta United II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
2 : 5
Atlanta United FC II

FAQ

What was the result of Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Atlanta United II 2:1 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Atlanta United II and Chicago Fire II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Atlanta United II won 3, Chicago Fire II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?

Atlanta United II score 2.05 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 2.00. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Atlanta United II's matches and 68% of Chicago Fire II's.

What form are Atlanta United II and Chicago Fire II in?

Over the last 5 games Atlanta United II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Atlanta United II vs Chicago Fire II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.