Auda vs FS Jelgava: match statistics
Auda vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Auda played FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Auda: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. FS Jelgava: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Auda scores 2.00 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 0.75 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Auda 63%, FS Jelgava 44%. Over 2.5: Auda 69%, FS Jelgava 38%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.23. Auda: 12.9 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 9.8.
Match halves
Auda: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.25.
Goals by minute
Auda: 31-45+ (8 goals). FS Jelgava: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Auda is the favorite in this match: they sit 3rd in the table versus FS Jelgava's 7th, have 11 wins this season compared to the visitors' 3 wins, and have scored 32 goals versus 12 for their opponents. At home Auda averages 2.38 goals per game and registers 5.13 shots on target and 13.38 total shots with a conversion rate of 18%, while FS Jelgava away averages only 0.63 goals per game, 2.5 shots on target and a 7% conversion rate. Auda's average xG is 1.72 per home match versus Jelgava's xG 1.17 on the road, and they maintain 61% average possession, whereas Jelgava failed to score in 50% of away matches and concedes 1.75 goals on average away. Form also favors the hosts: in the last 5 matches Auda has 3 wins and averages 1.8 points per game, while Jelgava in their last five have not won once, have 4 draws and average 0.8 points per game. Considering the advantage in creating and converting chances (5.13 vs 2.5 shots on target, 18% vs 7% conversion) and greater control of the game (61% vs 42% possession), I tip the home win and assess chances at 65% for Auda, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I favor the “BTTS - Yes” scenario because despite low average goals scored (Auda 0.88, FS Jelgava 0.63), both teams consistently concede: Auda concedes 2.0 goals/match on average, Jelgava 1.75. On the xG level both sides create and concede chances — Auda xG_for 1.29 and xG_against 1.63, Jelgava xG_for 1.17 and xG_against 1.87 — indicating an exchange of scoring opportunities even if finishing is inefficient. In the last 5 fixtures BTTS occurred in 40% of Auda’s matches and 60% of Jelgava’s, while across the season Auda registers 50% BTTS with only 13% clean sheets, and Jelgava 38% BTTS with 25% clean sheets, which favors matches with goals at both ends. Additionally Auda averages 10.25 shots (3.5 on target) and Jelgava 9.25 (2.5 on target), with conversion rates of 9% and 7% — this shows chances are being created and with a bit of finishing both teams scoring is likely. Overall I assess BTTS at 58% versus 42% for No BTTS, because the xG advantage and high average goals conceded (2.0 and 1.75) outweigh the low season scoring averages.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-and-defensive model yields expected goals: Auda 1.58 (attacking xG 1.29 vs opponent conceding 1.87), FS Jelgava 1.40 (attacking xG 1.17 vs opponent conceding 1.63), total 2.98 goals. Both teams have 63% of their matches this season with over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 3.03 goals per game, which corroborates that a result close to 3.0 is realistic. Auda concedes on average 2.0 goals per match and has only 13% clean sheets, Jelgava concedes 1.75 goals and has 25% clean sheets, so the defenses are vulnerable to goals. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I estimate Over 1.5 ~82%), while Over 2.5 is assessed at 58% and Over 3.5 at 28%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Form analysis shows Auda has a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches (3/5) and averages 1.8 points per game in that period, while FS Jelgava have not won any of their last 5 matches (0% wins) and drew 80% of them. A draw at the break is a common scenario — both teams record a draw at half-time in 38% of their outings, and the average goals by half-time in the last 5 matches are 1.6 for the home side and 0.8 for the visitors. Auda holds a slight quality edge (xG 1.29 versus 1.17 for Jelgava) and generates more shots on target (3.5 vs 2.5), which increases the home side’s chance to break the deadlock after the break. At the same time Auda concedes many goals (on average 2.0 conceded per game), so there is a risk that both teams will score — the home side have such matches in 50% of their appearances; nevertheless the form balance and superior offensive metrics indicate Auda is most likely to decide the match in the second half. Therefore I recommend a Half-Time draw and Auda to win Full-Time (X/1) as the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Auda is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Auda · 0.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 167% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Auda · 0.75 goals / match - FS Jelgava
Auda is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.25 goals / match - Auda · 1.88 goals / match - FS Jelgava
Auda scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
FS Jelgava scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - FS Jelgava
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Auda · 1.31 pts / match - FS Jelgava
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
FS Jelgava - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Auda
FS Jelgava
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | FS Jelgava | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.25 | 3.05 | ▼ 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 61% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 69% | 56% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 20% | • 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 77% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | ▼ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Auda 3 - 1 - 1 FS Jelgava. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs FS Jelgava?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:1 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and FS Jelgava?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 3, FS Jelgava won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs FS Jelgava?
Auda score 2.00 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.75. The Virsliga average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Auda's matches and 44% of FS Jelgava's.
What form are Auda and FS Jelgava in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and FS Jelgava 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs FS Jelgava?
The statistical background for Auda vs FS Jelgava — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


