Latvia - VirsligaĶekavas stadionsData current as of 06 September 2026

Auda vs FS Jelgava: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
1 : 1half-time 0:1
FS Jelgava crest
FS Jelgava

Auda vs FS Jelgava: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auda played FS Jelgava in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Auda: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. FS Jelgava: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auda scores 2.00 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. FS Jelgava scores 0.75 and concedes 1.88. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auda 63%, FS Jelgava 44%. Over 2.5: Auda 69%, FS Jelgava 38%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.23. Auda: 12.9 shots per match, FS Jelgava: 9.8.

Match halves

Auda: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.00. FS Jelgava: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.25.

Goals by minute

Auda: 31-45+ (8 goals). FS Jelgava: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the favorite in this match: they sit 3rd in the table versus FS Jelgava's 7th, have 11 wins this season compared to the visitors' 3 wins, and have scored 32 goals versus 12 for their opponents. At home Auda averages 2.38 goals per game and registers 5.13 shots on target and 13.38 total shots with a conversion rate of 18%, while FS Jelgava away averages only 0.63 goals per game, 2.5 shots on target and a 7% conversion rate. Auda's average xG is 1.72 per home match versus Jelgava's xG 1.17 on the road, and they maintain 61% average possession, whereas Jelgava failed to score in 50% of away matches and concedes 1.75 goals on average away. Form also favors the hosts: in the last 5 matches Auda has 3 wins and averages 1.8 points per game, while Jelgava in their last five have not won once, have 4 draws and average 0.8 points per game. Considering the advantage in creating and converting chances (5.13 vs 2.5 shots on target, 18% vs 7% conversion) and greater control of the game (61% vs 42% possession), I tip the home win and assess chances at 65% for Auda, 20% for a draw and 15% for the away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I favor the “BTTS - Yes” scenario because despite low average goals scored (Auda 0.88, FS Jelgava 0.63), both teams consistently concede: Auda concedes 2.0 goals/match on average, Jelgava 1.75. On the xG level both sides create and concede chances — Auda xG_for 1.29 and xG_against 1.63, Jelgava xG_for 1.17 and xG_against 1.87 — indicating an exchange of scoring opportunities even if finishing is inefficient. In the last 5 fixtures BTTS occurred in 40% of Auda’s matches and 60% of Jelgava’s, while across the season Auda registers 50% BTTS with only 13% clean sheets, and Jelgava 38% BTTS with 25% clean sheets, which favors matches with goals at both ends. Additionally Auda averages 10.25 shots (3.5 on target) and Jelgava 9.25 (2.5 on target), with conversion rates of 9% and 7% — this shows chances are being created and with a bit of finishing both teams scoring is likely. Overall I assess BTTS at 58% versus 42% for No BTTS, because the xG advantage and high average goals conceded (2.0 and 1.75) outweigh the low season scoring averages.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-and-defensive model yields expected goals: Auda 1.58 (attacking xG 1.29 vs opponent conceding 1.87), FS Jelgava 1.40 (attacking xG 1.17 vs opponent conceding 1.63), total 2.98 goals. Both teams have 63% of their matches this season with over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 3.03 goals per game, which corroborates that a result close to 3.0 is realistic. Auda concedes on average 2.0 goals per match and has only 13% clean sheets, Jelgava concedes 1.75 goals and has 25% clean sheets, so the defenses are vulnerable to goals. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I estimate Over 1.5 ~82%), while Over 2.5 is assessed at 58% and Over 3.5 at 28%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Form analysis shows Auda has a 60% win rate in the last 5 matches (3/5) and averages 1.8 points per game in that period, while FS Jelgava have not won any of their last 5 matches (0% wins) and drew 80% of them. A draw at the break is a common scenario — both teams record a draw at half-time in 38% of their outings, and the average goals by half-time in the last 5 matches are 1.6 for the home side and 0.8 for the visitors. Auda holds a slight quality edge (xG 1.29 versus 1.17 for Jelgava) and generates more shots on target (3.5 vs 2.5), which increases the home side’s chance to break the deadlock after the break. At the same time Auda concedes many goals (on average 2.0 conceded per game), so there is a risk that both teams will score — the home side have such matches in 50% of their appearances; nevertheless the form balance and superior offensive metrics indicate Auda is most likely to decide the match in the second half. Therefore I recommend a Half-Time draw and Auda to win Full-Time (X/1) as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
AudaFS Jelgava
13Shots9
AudaFS Jelgava
6Shots on target4
AudaFS Jelgava
1.56xG1.15
AudaFS Jelgava
5Corners6
AudaFS Jelgava
44Dangerous attacks42
AudaFS Jelgava
18Fouls15
AudaFS Jelgava
3Cards3
AudaFS Jelgava

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match0.75
AudaFS Jelgava
1.25Goals conceded / match1.88
AudaFS Jelgava
59%Average possession43%
AudaFS Jelgava
4.69Shots on target / match3
AudaFS Jelgava

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.94Shots per match9.75
AudaFS Jelgava
4.69Shots on target3
AudaFS Jelgava
15.5%Shot conversion7.7%
AudaFS Jelgava
59%Possession43%
AudaFS Jelgava
1.61xG for1.23
AudaFS Jelgava
1.19xG against1.75
AudaFS Jelgava

Shooting quality

Auda: Efficient finishingFS Jelgava: Balanced
AudaFS Jelgava
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Auda · 0.8 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Auda
LLWWW
Season result split
69% W6% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-1-4
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-0-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
FS Jelgava
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
19% W38% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-7
0.94 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 167% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Auda · 0.75 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Auda is 50% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Auda · 1.88 goals / match - FS Jelgava

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 94% of matches (15 of 16 matches), while FS Jelgava keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

FS Jelgava scoring profile: strong

FS Jelgava scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).

32Goals scored (season)12
AudaFS Jelgava
20Goals conceded (season)30
AudaFS Jelgava
3.25Average goals in match2.63
AudaFS Jelgava
7Goals scored (last 5)4
AudaFS Jelgava
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
AudaFS Jelgava

How often they score at least...

94%1 goal56%
AudaFS Jelgava
63%2 goals19%
AudaFS Jelgava
19%3 goals0%
AudaFS Jelgava
6%4 goals0%
AudaFS Jelgava

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal81%
AudaFS Jelgava
31%2 goals31%
AudaFS Jelgava
19%3 goals25%
AudaFS Jelgava
6%4 goals19%
AudaFS Jelgava

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time13%
AudaFS Jelgava
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Scored in both halves6%
AudaFS Jelgava

BTTS and goal count

56%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
AudaFS Jelgava
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
AudaFS Jelgava
40%BTTS - last 560%
AudaFS Jelgava

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
AudaFS Jelgava
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AudaFS Jelgava

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
AudaFS Jelgava
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
AudaFS Jelgava

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.75 pts / match - Auda · 1.31 pts / match - FS Jelgava

Auda - half-time state
50% leading25% draw25% trailing
FS Jelgava - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.75Points per match (1st half)1.31
AudaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
AudaFS Jelgava
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
AudaFS Jelgava
1.63Average goals (1st half)1.13
AudaFS Jelgava
56%Clean sheet before half-time56%
AudaFS Jelgava
25%No goal before half-time63%
AudaFS Jelgava

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per match (2nd half)0.81
AudaFS Jelgava
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
AudaFS Jelgava
0.63Goals conceded (2nd half)1.25
AudaFS Jelgava
1.63Average goals (2nd half)1.5
AudaFS Jelgava
50%Clean sheet after half-time38%
AudaFS Jelgava
31%No goal after half-time75%
AudaFS Jelgava

Auda - second-half results

38% W44% R19% P
28
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FS Jelgava - second-half results

19% W25% R56% P
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
FS Jelgava - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+2-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
4
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

FS Jelgava
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
3
5
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
6
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.94
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.42
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

FS Jelgava

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.61
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaFS Jelgava
Average goals in match 3.253.05 2.63
Both teams scored 63%61% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%56% 38%
Clean sheets 31%20% 19%
Goal before half-time 88%77% 69%
Goal after half-time 88%86% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AudaYellow cardKader Kone
  2. FS JelgavaYellow cardTomas Rataj
  3. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Gļebs PatikaOff: Tomas Rataj
  4. FS JelgavaGoalAlans KangarsAssist: Glebs Žaleiko
  5. FS JelgavaYellow cardRihards Bečers
  6. FS JelgavaYellow cardGlebs Žaleiko
  7. FS JelgavaSubstitutionOn: Emīls Kristers ŠmaukstelisOff: Gļebs Kačanovs
  8. AudaYellow cardJosé Mendieta
  9. AudaYellow cardBarthélémy Diedhiou
  10. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ousmane CamaraOff: José Mendieta

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Auda 3 - 1 - 1 FS Jelgava. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 60% matches.

FS Jelgava
2 : 3
Auda
FS Jelgava
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava
FS Jelgava
3 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 0
FS Jelgava

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs FS Jelgava?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 1:1 FS Jelgava. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and FS Jelgava?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 3, FS Jelgava won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs FS Jelgava?

Auda score 2.00 goals per game on average and FS Jelgava 0.75. The Virsliga average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Auda's matches and 44% of FS Jelgava's.

What form are Auda and FS Jelgava in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and FS Jelgava 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs FS Jelgava?

The statistical background for Auda vs FS Jelgava — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.