Latvia - VirsligaĶekavas stadionsData current as of 03 September 2026

Auda vs Liepāja: match statistics

Auda crest
Auda
3 : 1half-time 2:0
Liepāja crest
Liepāja

Auda vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Auda played Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Auda: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Liepāja: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Auda scores 2.00 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.23 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.10 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Auda 69%, Liepāja 62%. Over 2.5: Auda 77%, Liepāja 54%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.43. Auda: 12.8 shots per match, Liepāja: 11.7.

Match halves

Auda: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.00. Liepāja: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77.

Goals by minute

Auda: 31-45+ (7 goals). Liepāja: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 40%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the match favorite: at home they average 2.33 goals per game (26 goals this season, 12 in the last 5), while Liepāja score only 0.83 goals per away game (16 goals this season, 7 in the last 5). The hosts register an average of 5 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 18% at home, whereas the visitors have 3.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion rate away, indicating a significant efficiency edge. xG is similar (1.67 xG for Auda at home vs 1.56 xG for Liepāja away), but Auda fail to score in only 17% of home matches versus 50% of Liepāja’s away matches, which further favors the hosts. In the last 5 matches Auda have scored 12 goals and recorded 3 wins with an average of 1.8 points per game, while Liepāja have 7 goals and 1.4 points per game and a negative away goal difference of -6, therefore I predict an Auda victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The primary case for BTTS - Yes is Auda’s very high seasonal rate of matches with both teams scoring: 86%, combined with zero clean sheets (0%) and an average of 1.14 goals conceded per match, meaning the hosts almost always concede at least one goal. Liepāja has a seasonal BTTS of only 33% and a low goals scored average of 0.83, but its xG_for_avg is 1.56 and over the last 5 matches it averaged 1.4 goals, i.e. it creates chances despite poor finishing (conversion rate 6%). Auda scores 1.57 goals seasonally and has a high conversion of 16%, and in the last 5 matches scored 12 goals (2.4 avg) and conceded 9 (1.8 avg), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally, the league’s BTTS is 60% with an average goals per match of 3.07, and in H2H xG terms against Auda’s defense (xG_against 1.26) Liepāja generates xG 1.56, suggesting realistic chances for an away goal. Considering the strong signal from Auda (86% BTTS, 0% clean sheets) and Liepāja’s offensive numbers in xG and the last 5 matches, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% for Yes and 30% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and goals-per-game analysis points to a high-goals potential: Auda’s xG is 1.32 and xG against Liepāja is 1.47, yielding expected home goals of ~1.40; Liepāja’s xG is 1.56 and xG against Auda 1.26, yielding expected away goals of ~1.41, total 2.81. This aligns with form and seasonal stats: Auda averages 1.57 goals per home game, Liepāja 0.83, and in the last 5 matches Auda averaged 2.4 goals, Liepāja 1.4 (combined 3.8). Line statistics show Over 1.5 goals occurs frequently — 86% of Auda’s home matches and 67% of Liepāja’s matches; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (57% for hosts, 50% for guests, league average 55%). Given the projected 2.81 goals, Auda’s high rate of both teams scoring (86% at home) and Auda’s superior finishing (conversion rate 16% vs 6% for Liepāja), I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 also has an edge but is less certain.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Auda led at half-time in 4 of 7 matches this season (57%) and averages 0.57 goals by the break versus 0.33 for Liepāja, with no draws at half-time (0%). In the second half Auda averages 1.00 goal scored and 0.71 conceded, while Liepāja scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00 after the break, giving Auda a better post-break balance and a greater chance to hold or extend a lead. Despite higher xG for the visitors (1.56 vs 1.32), Auda converts chances far more efficiently (conversion rate 16% vs 6%) and registers more shots on target (4.43 vs 3.67), supporting a higher home win percentage (43% vs 33%). Additionally, 86% of Auda’s home matches have featured both teams scoring, so the most likely scenario is Auda leading at the break and the home side winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
AudaLiepāja
14Shots10
AudaLiepāja
5Shots on target3
AudaLiepāja
1.83xG1.25
AudaLiepāja
7Corners4
AudaLiepāja
83Dangerous attacks57
AudaLiepāja
19Fouls19
AudaLiepāja
2Cards3
AudaLiepāja

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1.23
AudaLiepāja
1.46Goals conceded / match1.46
AudaLiepāja
57%Average possession53%
AudaLiepāja
4.62Shots on target / match4.08
AudaLiepāja

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.77Shots per match11.69
AudaLiepāja
4.62Shots on target4.08
AudaLiepāja
15.7%Shot conversion10.5%
AudaLiepāja
57%Possession53%
AudaLiepāja
1.57xG for1.43
AudaLiepāja
1.21xG against1.36
AudaLiepāja

Shooting quality

Auda: Efficient finishingLiepāja: Balanced
AudaLiepāja
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Auda · 1.4 pts / match - Liepāja

Auda
WWWLL
Season result split
62% W8% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-4
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.24BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Liepāja
DLLWW
Season result split
38% W23% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-5
1.38 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 63% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Auda · 1.23 goals / match - Liepāja

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

Liepāja scoring profile: very strong

Liepāja scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).

26Goals scored (season)16
AudaLiepāja
19Goals conceded (season)19
AudaLiepāja
3.46Average goals in match2.69
AudaLiepāja
12Goals scored (last 5)7
AudaLiepāja
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
AudaLiepāja

How often they score at least...

92%1 goal69%
AudaLiepāja
62%2 goals38%
AudaLiepāja
15%3 goals8%
AudaLiepāja
8%4 goals8%
AudaLiepāja

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal92%
AudaLiepāja
38%2 goals31%
AudaLiepāja
23%3 goals8%
AudaLiepāja
8%4 goals8%
AudaLiepāja

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time0%
AudaLiepāja
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AudaLiepāja
46%Scored in both halves23%
AudaLiepāja

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS46%
AudaLiepāja
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
AudaLiepāja
60%BTTS - last 560%
AudaLiepāja

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

92%Min. 1 goal before half-time85%
AudaLiepāja
54%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
AudaLiepāja
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
AudaLiepāja

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time92%
AudaLiepāja
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time46%
AudaLiepāja
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
AudaLiepāja

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Auda · 1.31 pts / match - Liepāja

Auda - half-time state
46% leading23% draw31% trailing
Liepāja - half-time state
38% leading15% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1.31
AudaLiepāja
1Goals scored (1st half)0.46
AudaLiepāja
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
AudaLiepāja
1.77Average goals (1st half)1.08
AudaLiepāja
46%Clean sheet before half-time54%
AudaLiepāja
23%No goal before half-time62%
AudaLiepāja

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.23
AudaLiepāja
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
AudaLiepāja
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
AudaLiepāja
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.62
AudaLiepāja
46%Clean sheet after half-time23%
AudaLiepāja
38%No goal after half-time46%
AudaLiepāja

Auda - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
21
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liepāja - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.61.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%40%
3 goals60%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Auda
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
6
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
0
0
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
0
2
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.36
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

AudaLigaLiepāja
Average goals in match 3.463.10 2.69
Both teams scored 69%59% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%57% 54%
Clean sheets 23%21% 8%
Goal before half-time 92%77% 85%
Goal after half-time 85%87% 92%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.10
Average goals per match
59%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LiepājaYellow cardVladislavs Sorokins
  2. AudaYellow cardYouba Traore
  3. AudaGoalJosé MendietaAssist: Kader Kone
  4. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Djibril GueyeOff: Kyvon Leidsman
  5. AudaSubstitutionOn: Meleye DiagneOff: Kader Kone
  6. AudaYellow cardAriel Arroyo
  7. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ariel ArroyoOff: Ibrahim Pekegnon Kone
  8. LiepājaYellow cardAndrii Korobenko
  9. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Danila PatijčuksOff: Ivans Patrikejevs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Auda 2 - 1 - 2 Liepāja. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 40% matches.

Liepāja
1 : 2
Auda
FK Auda Riga
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Liepāja
0 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
3 : 0
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of Auda vs Liepāja?

The Virsliga match finished Auda 3:1 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Liepāja?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 2, Liepāja won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Liepāja?

Auda score 2.00 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.23. The Virsliga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Auda's matches and 62% of Liepāja's.

What form are Auda and Liepāja in?

Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Liepāja 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Liepāja?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Liepāja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.