Auda vs Liepāja: match statistics
Auda vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Auda played Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Ķekavas stadions. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Auda: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Liepāja: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Auda scores 2.00 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.23 and concedes 1.46. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Auda 69%, Liepāja 62%. Over 2.5: Auda 77%, Liepāja 54%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Auda has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.43. Auda: 12.8 shots per match, Liepāja: 11.7.
Match halves
Auda: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.00. Liepāja: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.77.
Goals by minute
Auda: 31-45+ (7 goals). Liepāja: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-2. Average goals 2.20, BTTS 40%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Auda is the match favorite: at home they average 2.33 goals per game (26 goals this season, 12 in the last 5), while Liepāja score only 0.83 goals per away game (16 goals this season, 7 in the last 5). The hosts register an average of 5 shots on target per game and a conversion rate of 18% at home, whereas the visitors have 3.67 shots on target and a 6% conversion rate away, indicating a significant efficiency edge. xG is similar (1.67 xG for Auda at home vs 1.56 xG for Liepāja away), but Auda fail to score in only 17% of home matches versus 50% of Liepāja’s away matches, which further favors the hosts. In the last 5 matches Auda have scored 12 goals and recorded 3 wins with an average of 1.8 points per game, while Liepāja have 7 goals and 1.4 points per game and a negative away goal difference of -6, therefore I predict an Auda victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The primary case for BTTS - Yes is Auda’s very high seasonal rate of matches with both teams scoring: 86%, combined with zero clean sheets (0%) and an average of 1.14 goals conceded per match, meaning the hosts almost always concede at least one goal. Liepāja has a seasonal BTTS of only 33% and a low goals scored average of 0.83, but its xG_for_avg is 1.56 and over the last 5 matches it averaged 1.4 goals, i.e. it creates chances despite poor finishing (conversion rate 6%). Auda scores 1.57 goals seasonally and has a high conversion of 16%, and in the last 5 matches scored 12 goals (2.4 avg) and conceded 9 (1.8 avg), which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Additionally, the league’s BTTS is 60% with an average goals per match of 3.07, and in H2H xG terms against Auda’s defense (xG_against 1.26) Liepāja generates xG 1.56, suggesting realistic chances for an away goal. Considering the strong signal from Auda (86% BTTS, 0% clean sheets) and Liepāja’s offensive numbers in xG and the last 5 matches, I assess the probability of BTTS at 70% for Yes and 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goals-per-game analysis points to a high-goals potential: Auda’s xG is 1.32 and xG against Liepāja is 1.47, yielding expected home goals of ~1.40; Liepāja’s xG is 1.56 and xG against Auda 1.26, yielding expected away goals of ~1.41, total 2.81. This aligns with form and seasonal stats: Auda averages 1.57 goals per home game, Liepāja 0.83, and in the last 5 matches Auda averaged 2.4 goals, Liepāja 1.4 (combined 3.8). Line statistics show Over 1.5 goals occurs frequently — 86% of Auda’s home matches and 67% of Liepāja’s matches; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (57% for hosts, 50% for guests, league average 55%). Given the projected 2.81 goals, Auda’s high rate of both teams scoring (86% at home) and Auda’s superior finishing (conversion rate 16% vs 6% for Liepāja), I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 also has an edge but is less certain.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Auda led at half-time in 4 of 7 matches this season (57%) and averages 0.57 goals by the break versus 0.33 for Liepāja, with no draws at half-time (0%). In the second half Auda averages 1.00 goal scored and 0.71 conceded, while Liepāja scores 0.50 and concedes 1.00 after the break, giving Auda a better post-break balance and a greater chance to hold or extend a lead. Despite higher xG for the visitors (1.56 vs 1.32), Auda converts chances far more efficiently (conversion rate 16% vs 6%) and registers more shots on target (4.43 vs 3.67), supporting a higher home win percentage (43% vs 33%). Additionally, 86% of Auda’s home matches have featured both teams scoring, so the most likely scenario is Auda leading at the break and the home side winning at full-time (HT/FT 1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Auda | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Auda is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Auda · 1.4 pts / match - Liepāja
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Auda is 63% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Auda · 1.23 goals / match - Liepāja
Auda scores in 92% of matches (12 of 13 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
Liepāja scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Auda
Over / Under - Liepāja
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Auda is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.62 pts / match - Auda · 1.31 pts / match - Liepāja
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Auda - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Liepāja - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Auda
Liepāja
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| Auda | Liga | Liepāja | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.46 | 3.10 | ▼ 2.69 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 59% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 77% | 57% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 23% | 21% | ▼ 8% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 92% | 77% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 85% | 87% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Auda 2 - 1 - 2 Liepāja. Average goals 2.20, both teams scored in 40% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Auda vs Liepāja?
The Virsliga match finished Auda 3:1 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Auda and Liepāja?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Auda won 2, Liepāja won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Auda vs Liepāja?
Auda score 2.00 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.23. The Virsliga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Auda's matches and 62% of Liepāja's.
What form are Auda and Liepāja in?
Over the last 5 games Auda have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Liepāja 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Auda vs Liepāja?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Auda vs Liepāja: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


