United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 18 September 2026

Austin II vs Colorado Rapids II: match statistics

Austin II crest
Austin II
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Colorado Rapids II crest
Colorado Rapids II

Austin II vs Colorado Rapids II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin II played Colorado Rapids II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 14 September 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Austin II: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Colorado Rapids II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin II scores 1.96 and concedes 0.81 goals per match. Colorado Rapids II scores 0.96 and concedes 1.96. League average: 3.35 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin II 50%, Colorado Rapids II 58%. Over 2.5: Austin II 46%, Colorado Rapids II 54%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Austin II has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.43. Austin II: 13.5 shots per match, Colorado Rapids II: 11.9.

Match halves

Austin II: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.96. Colorado Rapids II: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Austin II: 61-75 (13 goals). Colorado Rapids II: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.35 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 3-0-2. Average goals 3.80, BTTS 60%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Austin II are the home leaders, while Colorado Rapids II sit 29th in the away standings, clearly highlighting the scale of the gap. The hosts have won 17 of their 26 matches this season and prevail in 69% of their home games, whereas the visitors are yet to win away from home, losing as many as 77% of such fixtures. Austin II average 2.15 goals at home with an xG of 1.63, while Colorado concede 2.15 goals per away match and have kept no clean sheets. The visitors’ attack is another concern: they score just 0.77 goals per game away from home, fail to score in 46% of their away fixtures, and convert only 6% of their shots, compared with 16% for the hosts. Current form also favors Austin II, who have recorded 3 wins and conceded just 3 goals in their last five matches, making a home victory the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal BTTS rate stands at 62% for Austin II and 54% for Colorado Rapids II, compared with a league average of 63%, which moderately supports goals for both sides. Colorado Rapids II have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.15 goals, so the hosts, with an xG of 1.40 and an average of 4.23 shots on target, should create scoring opportunities. Austin II are also not particularly stable defensively, conceding an average of 1.77 goals with opponents’ xG at 1.76, while the visitors generate an xG of 1.46. The hosts’ last five matches reduce confidence in the pick, as BTTS landed in only 40% of them and the team conceded just 3 goals, although Colorado averaged 1.6 goals scored during this period. The overall balance of arguments still slightly favors the scenario in which both teams score, primarily due to the visitors’ very weak seasonal defense and both teams’ solid chance-creation metrics.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to approximately 2.77 goals: Austin’s average xG is 1.40, while Colorado concede 1.66 xG, and Colorado generate an average of 1.46 xG compared with 1.76 xG allowed by the hosts. In their last five matches, both teams have scored 1.6 goals per game, but Austin have significantly improved defensively, conceding only 0.6 goals per match. The 3.5 line was exceeded in 46% of Austin’s matches and in just 31% of Colorado’s, while 54% and 69% of their respective matches finished below it. Colorado failed to score in 46% of their appearances, limiting the chances of a very high-scoring game despite the visitors’ poor season-long defensive record. The strongest option is Under 3.5, as the data support a scenario with 2 or 3 goals more often than a match with at least four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Austin II have shown significantly better form in their last five matches: they have won three games, scoring an average of 1.6 goals and conceding just 0.6, while Colorado Rapids II have lost two of their five matches and conceded an average of 1.6 goals. The hosts were leading at the break in 60% of their last five appearances and did not lose any of those matches after half-time, whereas the visitors were ahead at half-time in only 20% of their games during this period. Across the season, Colorado went into half-time trailing in as many as 77% of matches, conceding an average of 1.15 goals before the break, which supports the expectation that Austin will take an early lead. Austin have also scored 0.8 goals before half-time in their last five matches and kept four clean sheets during that period, making a home lead at half-time followed by a full-time victory the most likely scenario: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
16Shots15
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
5Shots on target2
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1.86xG1.43
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
3Corners5
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
69Dangerous attacks48
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
7Fouls22
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1Cards2
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1.96Goals scored / match0.96
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
0.81Goals conceded / match1.96
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
51%Average possession53%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
5.35Shots on target / match4.19
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.46Shots per match11.88
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
5.35Shots on target4.19
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
14.6%Shot conversion8.1%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
51%Possession53%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1.64xG for1.43
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1.42xG against1.71
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

Shooting quality

Austin II: Efficient finishingColorado Rapids II: Balanced
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
Accuracy (shots on target)40%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Austin II is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Austin II · 1 pts / match - Colorado Rapids II

Austin II
WDWLW
Season result split
65% W23% D12% L
Season (W-D-L)
17-6-3
2.19 pts / match · goal difference +30
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Colorado Rapids II
DDWLL
Season result split
12% W23% D65% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-17
0.58 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-10
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Austin II is 104% better for: goals scored per match.

1.96 goals / match - Austin II · 0.96 goals / match - Colorado Rapids II

Austin II is 142% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.81 goals / match - Austin II · 1.96 goals / match - Colorado Rapids II

Austin II scoring profile: very strong

Austin II scores in 96% of matches (25 of 26 matches), while Colorado Rapids II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).

Colorado Rapids II scoring profile: mixed

Colorado Rapids II scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 50% (13 of 26 matches).

51Goals scored (season)25
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
21Goals conceded (season)51
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
2.77Average goals in match2.92
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
8Goals scored (last 5)8
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal65%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
62%2 goals23%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
27%3 goals4%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
12%4 goals4%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal88%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
19%2 goals77%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
8%3 goals27%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
4%4 goals4%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
Colorado Rapids II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 26 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time19%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
0%BTTS in both halves4%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
27%Scored in both halves12%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
40%BTTS - last 560%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time19%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin II is 140% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.04 pts / match - Austin II · 0.85 pts / match - Colorado Rapids II

Austin II - half-time state
58% leading31% draw12% trailing
Colorado Rapids II - half-time state
15% leading38% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.04Points per match (1st half)0.85
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.27
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
81%Clean sheet before half-time42%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
42%No goal before half-time65%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.96Points per match (2nd half)1
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.65
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
62%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II
35%No goal after half-time58%
Austin IIColorado Rapids II

Austin II - second-half results

58% W23% D19% L
53
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
51
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Colorado Rapids II - second-half results

23% W31% D46% L
22
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 12%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Austin II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Colorado Rapids II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin II
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
12
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
13
6
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Colorado Rapids II
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
2
7
16-30
7
11
31-45
4
10
46-60
3
9
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Colorado Rapids II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.72
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
67%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Austin IILigaColorado Rapids II
Average goals in match 2.773.35 2.92
Both teams scored 50%63% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%67% 54%
Clean sheets 50%20% 12%
Goal before half-time 69%77% 73%
Goal after half-time 85%85% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.35
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.91
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+33%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Colorado Rapids IIYellow cardVincent Rinaldi
  2. Austin IIYellow cardRiley Thomas
  3. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Dren DobrunaOff: Riley Thomas
  4. Austin IISubstitutionOn: Patrick GryczewskiOff: Diego Abarca
  5. Colorado Rapids IISubstitutionOn: Charlie Hayato HarperOff: Vincent Rinaldi
  6. Colorado Rapids IIYellow cardNathan Tchoumba
  7. Austin IIGoalPatrick GryczewskiAssist: Dren Dobruna

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Austin II 3 - 0 - 2 Colorado Rapids II. Average goals 3.80, both teams scored in 60% matches.

Austin II
3 : 2
Colorado Rapids II
Colorado Rapids II
0 : 2
Austin II
Colorado Rapids II
4 : 1
Austin FC II
Colorado Rapids II
1 : 0
Austin FC II
Austin FC II
4 : 2
Colorado Rapids II

FAQ

What was the result of Austin II vs Colorado Rapids II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished Austin II 1:0 Colorado Rapids II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Austin II and Colorado Rapids II?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Austin II won 3, Colorado Rapids II won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin II vs Colorado Rapids II?

Austin II score 1.96 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids II 0.96. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Austin II's matches and 58% of Colorado Rapids II's.

What form are Austin II and Colorado Rapids II in?

Over the last 5 games Austin II have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Colorado Rapids II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin II vs Colorado Rapids II?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.