United States - MLS Next ProData current as of 17 October 2026

Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin II play San Jose Earthquakes II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match date is 19 October 2026.

Current form

Austin II: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. San Jose Earthquakes II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin II scores 1.93 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. San Jose Earthquakes II scores 1.90 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.34 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin II 46%, San Jose Earthquakes II 62%. Over 2.5: Austin II 43%, San Jose Earthquakes II 59%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Austin II: 13.6 shots per match, San Jose Earthquakes II: 13.9.

Match halves

Austin II: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 0.96. San Jose Earthquakes II: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.90.

Goals by minute

Austin II: 61-75 (14 goals). San Jose Earthquakes II: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS Next Pro: 3.34 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.93Goals scored / match1.9
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.75Goals conceded / match1.38
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
50%Average possession51%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5.32Shots on target / match5.1
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.57Shots per match13.93
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
5.32Shots on target5.1
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
14.2%Shot conversion13.6%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
50%Possession51%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.65xG for1.65
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.43xG against1.48
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Shooting quality

Austin II: Efficient finishingSan Jose Earthquakes II: Efficient finishing
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
Accuracy (shots on target)39%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Austin II is 71% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Austin II · 1.4 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Austin II
WLWWW
Season result split
68% W21% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
19-6-3
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +33
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-2-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
San Jose Earthquakes II
LLWWD
Season result split
38% W24% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-11
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-5-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Austin II is 84% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Austin II · 1.38 goals / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Austin II scoring profile: very strong

Austin II scores in 96% of matches (27 of 28 matches), while San Jose Earthquakes II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).

San Jose Earthquakes II scoring profile: mixed

San Jose Earthquakes II scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Austin II keeps a clean sheet in 54% (15 of 28 matches).

54Goals scored (season)55
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
21Goals conceded (season)40
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
2.68Average goals in match3.28
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
7Goals scored (last 5)12
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
2Goals conceded (last 5)9
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal76%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
61%2 goals45%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
25%3 goals34%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11%4 goals21%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

How often they concede at least...

46%1 goal83%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
18%2 goals38%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
7%3 goals14%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
4%4 goals3%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

62%
San Jose Earthquakes II - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.18 of 29 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time24%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0%BTTS in both halves10%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
29%Scored in both halves38%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
20%BTTS - last 560%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
39%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time34%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin II is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.04 pts / match - Austin II · 1.76 pts / match - San Jose Earthquakes II

Austin II - half-time state
57% leading32% draw11% trailing
San Jose Earthquakes II - half-time state
45% leading41% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.04Points per match (1st half)1.76
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.96Goals scored (1st half)1
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.25Goals conceded (1st half)0.38
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.21Average goals (1st half)1.38
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
82%Clean sheet before half-time62%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
43%No goal before half-time41%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

After half-time (2nd half)

2.04Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.96Goals scored (2nd half)0.9
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.9
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
64%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II
32%No goal after half-time45%
Austin IISan Jose Earthquakes II

Austin II - second-half results

61% W21% D18% L
57
Half-time points
27
Half-time goals
+20
Goal difference (1st half)
57
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.04
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

San Jose Earthquakes II - second-half results

34% W14% D52% L
51
Half-time points
29
Half-time goals
+18
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Austin II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match0.61.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
San Jose Earthquakes II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+4-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin II
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
6
3
16-30
12
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
14
6
61-75
8
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (14 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

San Jose Earthquakes II
ScoredConceded
10
3
0-15
7
3
16-30
12
5
31-45
11
8
46-60
10
6
61-75
5
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.98
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.68
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

San Jose Earthquakes II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-16.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
132%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
73%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

Austin IILigaSan Jose Earthquakes II
Average goals in match▼ 2.683.34• 3.28
Both teams scored▼ 46%63%• 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 43%66%▼ 59%
Clean sheets▲ 54%20%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 68%76%▼ 72%
Goal after half-time• 86%85%▲ 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.34
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / match
1.44
Away goals / match
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Austin II 2 - 1 - 0 San Jose Earthquakes II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

When do Austin II and San Jose Earthquakes II play?

Austin II face San Jose Earthquakes II on 19 October 2026 in MLS Next Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Austin II and San Jose Earthquakes II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Austin II won 2, San Jose Earthquakes II won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Austin II score 1.93 goals per game on average and San Jose Earthquakes II 1.90. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.34 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Austin II's matches and 62% of San Jose Earthquakes II's.

What form are Austin II and San Jose Earthquakes II in?

Over the last 5 games Austin II have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and San Jose Earthquakes II 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Austin II vs San Jose Earthquakes II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.