United States - MLSQ2 StadiumData current as of 02 September 2026

Austin vs SJ Earthquakes: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Austin vs SJ Earthquakes: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Austin play SJ Earthquakes in MLS (United States). The match date is 6 September 2026. Venue: Q2 Stadium.

Current form

Austin: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. SJ Earthquakes: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Austin scores 1.27 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. SJ Earthquakes scores 1.77 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Austin 64%, SJ Earthquakes 59%. Over 2.5: Austin 73%, SJ Earthquakes 59%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

xG, shots and style

SJ Earthquakes has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.25. Austin: 10.7 shots per match, SJ Earthquakes: 13.8.

Match halves

Austin: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.68. SJ Earthquakes: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.95.

Goals by minute

Austin: 76-90+ (11 goals). SJ Earthquakes: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

MLS: 3.20 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(2.15)
(4.22)
(2.75)

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.27Goals scored / match1.77
AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.86Goals conceded / match1.5
AustinSJ Earthquakes
49%Average possession49%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
4.18Shots on target / match5.18
AustinSJ Earthquakes

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.68Shots per match13.77
AustinSJ Earthquakes
4.18Shots on target5.18
AustinSJ Earthquakes
11.9%Shot conversion12.9%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
49%Possession49%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.25xG for1.55
AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.9xG against1.43
AustinSJ Earthquakes

Shooting quality

Austin: BalancedSJ Earthquakes: Balanced
AustinSJ Earthquakes
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.34

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Austin is 600% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Austin · 0.2 pts / match - SJ Earthquakes

Austin
LLWDW
Season result split
27% W27% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.79BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
SJ Earthquakes
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W18% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-8
1.55 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-3
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

SJ Earthquakes is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Austin · 1.77 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

SJ Earthquakes is 24% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.86 goals / match - Austin · 1.5 goals / match - SJ Earthquakes

Austin scoring profile: very strong

Austin scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 matches).

SJ Earthquakes scoring profile: very strong

SJ Earthquakes scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while Austin keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

28Goals scored (season)39
AustinSJ Earthquakes
41Goals conceded (season)33
AustinSJ Earthquakes
3.14Average goals in match3.27
AustinSJ Earthquakes
6Goals scored (last 5)4
AustinSJ Earthquakes
6Goals conceded (last 5)13
AustinSJ Earthquakes

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal82%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
41%2 goals50%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
9%3 goals32%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
0%4 goals9%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal73%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
59%2 goals32%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
27%3 goals27%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
9%4 goals14%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time32%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
9%BTTS in both halves14%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
27%Scored in both halves32%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

BTTS and goal count

59%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
80%BTTS - last 560%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time82%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Austin - half-time state
27% leading50% draw23% trailing
SJ Earthquakes - half-time state
32% leading41% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)1.36
AustinSJ Earthquakes
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.82
AustinSJ Earthquakes
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.55
AustinSJ Earthquakes
50%Clean sheet before half-time45%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
45%No goal before half-time41%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.32
AustinSJ Earthquakes
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.95
AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.23Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
AustinSJ Earthquakes
1.91Average goals (2nd half)1.73
AustinSJ Earthquakes
32%Clean sheet after half-time55%
AustinSJ Earthquakes
50%No goal after half-time45%
AustinSJ Earthquakes

Austin - second-half results

18% W41% R41% P
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJ Earthquakes - second-half results

32% W36% R32% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Austin - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
SJ Earthquakes - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Austin
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
4
6
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
11
19
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

SJ Earthquakes
ScoredConceded
8
7
0-15
4
5
16-30
6
4
31-45
9
6
46-60
4
3
61-75
8
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+87%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Austin

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

SJ Earthquakes

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.35
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

AustinLigaSJ Earthquakes
Average goals in match 3.143.20 3.27
Both teams scored 64%63% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 73%62% 59%
Clean sheets 18%21% 27%
Goal before half-time 77%77% 82%
Goal after half-time 82%81% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.83
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Austin 0 - 0 - 1 SJ Earthquakes. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

When do Austin and SJ Earthquakes play?

Austin face SJ Earthquakes on 6 September 2026 in MLS at Q2 Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before Austin vs SJ Earthquakes?

Austin score 1.27 goals per game on average and SJ Earthquakes 1.77. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Austin's matches and 59% of SJ Earthquakes's.

What form are Austin and SJ Earthquakes in?

Over the last 5 games Austin have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and SJ Earthquakes 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Austin vs SJ Earthquakes?

The statistical background for Austin vs SJ Earthquakes — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.