Netherlands - Eerste DivisieData current as of 12 September 2026

AZ II vs MVV: match statistics

AZ II crest
AZ II
1 : 1half-time 1:0
MVV crest
MVV
135%(1.60)
X35%(4.20)
230%(3.90)

The clash between two weak teams in the lower half of the table promises to be very tight. AZ II sits in 18th place with a disastrous home record - an 80% loss rate and a mere 13% win rate at home, although they score an average of 1.4 goals per match and hold a possession advantage (58%). MVV, in 16th position, presents an equally poor away form with a 56% loss rate and only 19% wins, registering very low efficiency - averaging just 0.81 goals away with 56% of matches ending without scoring a goal. Both teams have a negative goal difference (AZ II: -12, MVV: -22) and poor form in their last 5 fixtures (0.8 and 1.0 points per match). Given the weakness of both sides, their scoring struggles, and the balanced sporting level, a draw seems the most likely outcome, although AZ II's slight home advantage in ball possession and xG gives them marginally better chances of securing a win.

AZ II vs MVV: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

AZ II played MVV in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 16 March 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

AZ II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. MVV: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

AZ II scores 1.68 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. MVV scores 1.23 and concedes 1.94. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: AZ II 65%, MVV 55%. Over 2.5: AZ II 74%, MVV 65%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

AZ II has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.30. AZ II: 13.2 shots per match, MVV: 11.4.

Match halves

AZ II: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 1.00. MVV: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

AZ II: 46-60 (11 goals). MVV: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eerste Divisie: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The clash between two weak teams in the lower half of the table promises to be very tight. AZ II sits in 18th place with a disastrous home record - an 80% loss rate and a mere 13% win rate at home, although they score an average of 1.4 goals per match and hold a possession advantage (58%). MVV, in 16th position, presents an equally poor away form with a 56% loss rate and only 19% wins, registering very low efficiency - averaging just 0.81 goals away with 56% of matches ending without scoring a goal. Both teams have a negative goal difference (AZ II: -12, MVV: -22) and poor form in their last 5 fixtures (0.8 and 1.0 points per match). Given the weakness of both sides, their scoring struggles, and the balanced sporting level, a draw seems the most likely outcome, although AZ II's slight home advantage in ball possession and xG gives them marginally better chances of securing a win.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
AZ IIMVV
30Shots10
AZ IIMVV
9Shots on target2
AZ IIMVV
3.08xG1
AZ IIMVV
11Corners3
AZ IIMVV
78Dangerous attacks30
AZ IIMVV
9Fouls6
AZ IIMVV
0Cards0
AZ IIMVV

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.68Goals scored / match1.23
AZ IIMVV
2Goals conceded / match1.94
AZ IIMVV
54%Average possession43%
AZ IIMVV
5.13Shots on target / match4.03
AZ IIMVV

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.23Shots per match11.45
AZ IIMVV
5.13Shots on target4.03
AZ IIMVV
12.7%Shot conversion10.7%
AZ IIMVV
54%Possession43%
AZ IIMVV
1.58xG for1.3
AZ IIMVV
1.5xG against1.97
AZ IIMVV

Shooting quality

AZ II: BalancedMVV: Balanced
AZ IIMVV
Accuracy (shots on target)39%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

MVV is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - AZ II · 1 pts / match - MVV

AZ II
WDLLL
Season result split
29% W10% D61% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-19
0.97 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-12
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
MVV
LLDDW
Season result split
29% W26% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-9
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 2.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AZ II is 37% better for: goals scored per match.

1.68 goals / match - AZ II · 1.23 goals / match - MVV

AZ II scoring profile: very strong

AZ II scores in 74% of matches (23 of 31 matches), while MVV keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).

MVV scoring profile: very strong

MVV scores in 61% of matches (19 of 31 matches), while AZ II keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 31 matches).

52Goals scored (season)38
AZ IIMVV
62Goals conceded (season)60
AZ IIMVV
3.68Average goals in match3.16
AZ IIMVV
8Goals scored (last 5)6
AZ IIMVV
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
AZ IIMVV

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal61%
AZ IIMVV
52%2 goals42%
AZ IIMVV
32%3 goals16%
AZ IIMVV
10%4 goals3%
AZ IIMVV

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal87%
AZ IIMVV
61%2 goals52%
AZ IIMVV
32%3 goals32%
AZ IIMVV
19%4 goals19%
AZ IIMVV

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time32%
AZ IIMVV
13%BTTS in both halves10%
AZ IIMVV
39%Scored in both halves29%
AZ IIMVV

BTTS and goal count

61%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
AZ IIMVV
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
AZ IIMVV
60%BTTS - last 560%
AZ IIMVV

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
AZ IIMVV
48%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
AZ IIMVV
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
AZ IIMVV

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
AZ IIMVV
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
AZ IIMVV
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
AZ IIMVV

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AZ II - half-time state
19% leading26% draw55% trailing
MVV - half-time state
13% leading48% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.84Points per match (1st half)0.87
AZ IIMVV
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.52
AZ IIMVV
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
AZ IIMVV
1.68Average goals (1st half)1.35
AZ IIMVV
26%Clean sheet before half-time39%
AZ IIMVV
45%No goal before half-time55%
AZ IIMVV

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per match (2nd half)1.26
AZ IIMVV
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
AZ IIMVV
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.1
AZ IIMVV
2Average goals (2nd half)1.81
AZ IIMVV
39%Clean sheet after half-time32%
AZ IIMVV
42%No goal after half-time55%
AZ IIMVV

AZ II - second-half results

29% W35% D35% L
26
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.84
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MVV - second-half results

32% W29% D39% L
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding223%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AZ II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.201.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
MVV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

AZ II
ScoredConceded
5
13
0-15
10
8
16-30
6
10
31-45
11
9
46-60
10
10
61-75
10
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

MVV
ScoredConceded
7
10
0-15
6
9
16-30
3
7
31-45
6
13
46-60
7
6
61-75
9
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.8 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+17%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

AZ II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

MVV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.67
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

AZ IILigaMVV
Average goals in match 3.683.21 3.16
Both teams scored 65%63% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 74%64% 65%
Clean sheets 13%20% 13%
Goal before half-time 90%77% 74%
Goal after half-time 81%85% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.73
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+17%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AZ IIGoalMatěj Šín
  2. AZ IIGoalRion Ichihara
  3. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Yoël van den BanOff: Bendegúz Kovács
  4. AZ IISubstitutionOn: Julian OeripOff: Matěj Šín
  5. MVVSubstitutionOn: Ilias BreugelmansOff: Kanou Sy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: AZ II 1 - 0 - 0 MVV. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of AZ II vs MVV?

The Eerste Divisie match finished AZ II 1:1 MVV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before AZ II vs MVV?

AZ II score 1.68 goals per game on average and MVV 1.23. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 65% of AZ II's matches and 55% of MVV's.

What form are AZ II and MVV in?

Over the last 5 games AZ II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and MVV 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for AZ II vs MVV?

The statistical background for AZ II vs MVV — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.