Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraData current as of 18 September 2026

Azam vs Pamba Jiji: match statistics

Azam crest
Azam
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji

Azam vs Pamba Jiji: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Azam played Pamba Jiji in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 14 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Azam: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Pamba Jiji: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Azam scores 1.38 and concedes 0.43 goals per match. Pamba Jiji scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.08 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Azam 24%, Pamba Jiji 36%. Over 2.5: Azam 38%, Pamba Jiji 45%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

Azam has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.27. Azam: 9.7 shots per match, Pamba Jiji: 5.5.

Match halves

Azam: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.67. Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Azam: 46-60 (8 goals). Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Azam are the favorites for this matchup: they have recorded no home losses (0% defeats), a 60% home win rate and concede on average 0 goals per match with 100% clean sheets. The hosts’ attack is supported by the numbers – average 1.4 goals per home game and 1.79 xG, and across the season Azam have scored 29 goals versus Pamba Jiji’s 22. Pamba Jiji average only 0.73 goals away, have an 8% conversion rate from 7.63 shots per game and 55% of away matches without scoring, while conceding 1.27 goals on average away. In the last 5 matches Azam have scored 8 goals and average 2 points per game, whereas Pamba have 3 goals, 0.8 points per game and have conceded 8 goals in that period. Based on the defensive advantage (0.0 vs 1.27 conceded on average), higher home xG (1.79 vs 1.23) and better shot efficiency (13% vs 8%), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project No BTTS with a 75% probability versus 25% for Yes. Azam averages 1.27 goals scored and concedes only 0.73 this season, records 55% clean sheets and has scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 per game) while conceding 4 (0.8 per game), indicating a solid defense. Pamba Jiji has a markedly weaker offensive output — 0.73 goals per game season-wide and only 0.6 in the last 5, while conceding 1.6 in the last 5 and posting just an 8% shot conversion, so they are unlikely to break down a well-organized home side. Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 36% (league 33%), and the league features 83% of matches with a clean sheet, which historically favors No Goal outcomes. Additionally, Azam boasts a superior conversion rate of 19% versus Pamba’s 8% and a season goal differential of 29-9 compared to 22-22; these figures amplify the defensive edge and justify the No BTTS selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate expected goals at 1.60 for Azam and 0.70 for Pamba Jiji (total 2.30), based on the last 5 matches: Azam averaged 1.6 goals scored and conceded 0.8; Pamba conceded 1.6 and scored only 0.6. xG are 1.31 for Azam and 1.23 for Pamba, indicating a similar number of chances, but Pamba’s shot conversion is low at 8% versus Azam’s 19%, so the visitors’ actual goals are limited. Seasonal data support a higher probability of at least 2 goals — Over 1.5 occurred in 64% of both teams’ matches, while Over 2.5 in 45%, and both teams to score in 36% of games. Additionally, Azam has 55% clean sheets at home, which reduces the chance of a high-scoring game from the visitors; therefore the strongest and most reliable signal from the data is a bet on Over 1.5 (estimated ~67% probability).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw appears most likely — Azam were level at the break in 67% of their matches and Pamba in 50%, giving an average of about a 59% chance of a draw at HT. Azam have a clear advantage after the break: they score on average 0.78 goals in the second half versus 0.10 for Pamba and win the second half in 44% of cases (Pamba 0%), which together gives roughly a 52% probability that the hosts will turn the result around after the break. Consequently the safest HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time and an Azam win by full-time (X/1) — forecast 30%; second is 1/1 (23%); third is X/X (21%). Additionally, Azam have a higher goals-per-game average 1.27 vs 0.73 and superior shot conversion 19% vs 8%, plus 3 wins in their last 5 matches, which confirms the hosts’ strength in the decisive part of the game.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
AzamPamba Jiji
11Shots5
AzamPamba Jiji
6Shots on target4
AzamPamba Jiji
2.19xG1.41
AzamPamba Jiji
6Corners3
AzamPamba Jiji
145Dangerous attacks110
AzamPamba Jiji
14Fouls38
AzamPamba Jiji
0Cards0
AzamPamba Jiji

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.38Goals scored / match1
AzamPamba Jiji
0.43Goals conceded / match1
AzamPamba Jiji
49%Average possession40%
AzamPamba Jiji
2.9Shots on target / match2.23
AzamPamba Jiji

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.71Shots per match5.45
AzamPamba Jiji
2.9Shots on target2.23
AzamPamba Jiji
14.2%Shot conversion18.3%
AzamPamba Jiji
49%Possession40%
AzamPamba Jiji
1.51xG for1.27
AzamPamba Jiji
0.98xG against1.25
AzamPamba Jiji

Shooting quality

Azam: Efficient finishingPamba Jiji: Counter-attacking
AzamPamba Jiji
Accuracy (shots on target)30%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.23
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.480.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Azam is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Azam · 0.8 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam
DWWWL
Season result split
48% W48% D5% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-10-1
1.90 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%
Pamba Jiji
LLWLD
Season result split
32% W41% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-6
1.36 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Azam is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.38 goals / match - Azam · 1 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam is 133% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.43 goals / match - Azam · 1 goals / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam scoring profile: strong

Azam scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 41% (9 of 22 matches).

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: more difficult

Pamba Jiji scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 76% (16 of 21 matches).

29Goals scored (season)22
AzamPamba Jiji
9Goals conceded (season)22
AzamPamba Jiji
1.81Average goals in match2
AzamPamba Jiji
8Goals scored (last 5)3
AzamPamba Jiji
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
AzamPamba Jiji

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal59%
AzamPamba Jiji
48%2 goals27%
AzamPamba Jiji
24%3 goals14%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%4 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji

How often they concede at least...

24%1 goal59%
AzamPamba Jiji
10%2 goals23%
AzamPamba Jiji
5%3 goals18%
AzamPamba Jiji
5%4 goals0%
AzamPamba Jiji

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time18%
AzamPamba Jiji
0%BTTS in both halves0%
AzamPamba Jiji
24%Scored in both halves14%
AzamPamba Jiji

BTTS and goal count

14%Min. 3 goals and BTTS18%
AzamPamba Jiji
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS27%
AzamPamba Jiji
20%BTTS - last 540%
AzamPamba Jiji

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

52%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
AzamPamba Jiji
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
AzamPamba Jiji
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
AzamPamba Jiji

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
AzamPamba Jiji
19%Min. 2 goals after half-time23%
AzamPamba Jiji
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
AzamPamba Jiji

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Azam is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.76 pts / match - Azam · 1.18 pts / match - Pamba Jiji

Azam - half-time state
43% leading48% draw10% trailing
Pamba Jiji - half-time state
18% leading64% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.76Points per match (1st half)1.18
AzamPamba Jiji
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.41
AzamPamba Jiji
0.19Goals conceded (1st half)0.41
AzamPamba Jiji
0.9Average goals (1st half)0.82
AzamPamba Jiji
90%Clean sheet before half-time64%
AzamPamba Jiji
52%No goal before half-time68%
AzamPamba Jiji

After half-time (2nd half)

1.71Points per match (2nd half)1
AzamPamba Jiji
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
AzamPamba Jiji
0.24Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
AzamPamba Jiji
0.9Average goals (2nd half)0.91
AzamPamba Jiji
76%Clean sheet after half-time64%
AzamPamba Jiji
57%No goal after half-time73%
AzamPamba Jiji

Azam - second-half results

43% W43% D14% L
37
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

18% W45% D36% L
26
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Azam - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.60
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Azam
ScoredConceded
6
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
5
3
31-45
8
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
5
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.90
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
30%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+110%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
14%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Azam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
52%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
122%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

AzamLigaPamba Jiji
Average goals in match 1.812.08 2.00
Both teams scored 24%33% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%37% 45%
Clean sheets 76%41% 41%
Goal before half-time 52%56% 50%
Goal after half-time 57%61% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.08
Average goals per match
33%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.82
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Faisal Salum⚽ 1
Jephté Kitambala Bola⚽ 1
Mzee MzeeA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AzamGoalFaisal Salum
  2. AzamGoalJephté Kitambala BolaAssist: Mzee Mzee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Azam 0 - 1 - 0 Pamba Jiji. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Azam vs Pamba Jiji?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 2:0 Pamba Jiji. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs Pamba Jiji?

Azam score 1.38 goals per game on average and Pamba Jiji 1.00. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 24% of Azam's matches and 36% of Pamba Jiji's.

What form are Azam and Pamba Jiji in?

Over the last 5 games Azam have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Pamba Jiji 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs Pamba Jiji?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.