Azam vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics
Azam vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Azam played Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Chamazi Stadium. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Azam: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Tanzania Prisons: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Azam scores 1.41 and concedes 0.41 goals per match. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.52 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Azam 23%, Tanzania Prisons 26%. Over 2.5: Azam 36%, Tanzania Prisons 35%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
Azam has higher xG: 1.54 vs 0.93. Azam: 9.8 shots per match, Tanzania Prisons: 3.7.
Match halves
Azam: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.73. Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.22.
Goals by minute
Azam: 46-60 (8 goals). Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.10 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Azam holds a clear advantage: they have scored 31 goals this season and conceded 9, and in the last 5 matches they have scored 10 goals and won 4 of 5 (form: wwwlw), translating to an average of 2.4 points per game over the last 5 matches. At home Azam averages 12.78 shots per game, of which 4.33 are on target, and has an average xG of 1.84 versus xG against 0.81, while Tanzania Prisons on the road register only 8.29 shots, 2.86 on target and xG 1.19. Defensively the hosts look significantly better — an average of 0 goals conceded in home matches and 100% clean sheets at home (no home defeats), whereas the visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals away, have a -11 goal difference on the road and only 10% clean sheets. The difference in chance quality and finishing is pronounced: Azam’s home conversion rate is 14% versus 5% for Tanzania Prisons away, and the visitors have 70% of away matches without scoring, which limits their realistic chances of taking points. Based on these numbers I predict a home win (1) — estimated probabilities: Azam win 80%, draw 12%, away win 8%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data and form indicate a low probability of BTTS - Yes: seasonal BTTS Azam 31% and Tanzania Prisons 20% versus league average 34%, meaning both teams are below the league average. Azam have scored 31 and conceded 9 this season (clean sheet in 46% of matches), while Prisons have 12 scored and 31 conceded, indicating a large disparity in the visitors' offensive quality. In the last 5 matches Azam average 2.0 scored and 0.8 conceded per game (10-4 in goals), whereas Prisons only 0.6 scored and 2.0 conceded (3-10), so the away side rarely scores. Efficiency confirms this: Azam have 3.0 shots and 1.0 on target with a 21% conversion, while Prisons average 8.29 shots and 2.86 on target but only 5% conversion; recent xG is 1.89 for Azam versus 0.76 for Prisons. Considering the home side’s 46% clean sheets, Prisons’ low 20% BTTS and the visitors’ poor conversion, a No Goal / clean sheet expected scenario appears more likely (80% vs 20%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.86 goals for Azam and 0.70 for Tanzania Prisons (total 2.56) based on recent xG and form. In their last 5 matches Azam scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) with recent xG 1.89, while Prisons scored 3 goals (0.6) and recent xG 0.76, indicating a clear attacking advantage for the home side. Seasonally Azam have 31 scored and 9 conceded with a seasonal average 0.62, while Prisons have 12 scored and 31 conceded with an average 0.4; additionally Azam convert 21% of shots vs 5% for the opponent, despite Prisons taking more shots (8.29 vs 3.00, shots on target 2.86 vs 1.00). A Poisson model with total 2.56 yields ~72% chance for Over 1.5 (>=2 goals), ~47% for Over 2.5 and ~26% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal from the data is a play on Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back a half-time draw and a home win (X/1) — both teams are frequently level at the break: Azam were drawing at half-time in 54% of matches, and Tanzania Prisons in 67%. Azam have a clear advantage in second-half form: in the last five matches they averaged 1.2 goals after the break and won the second half in 60% of cases, whereas Prisons had 0.0 goals after the break in those five games and a 0% second-half win rate. Additionally, the home side are more efficient from outside the box: Azam average 3.0 shots per match and 1.0 on target with a 21% conversion rate, while Prisons register more shots (8.29) and shots on target (2.86) but convert only 5%. Considering form and half-time points (last five: 80% half-time wins for Azam versus 20% for Prisons, HT Points 13 vs 6), the strongest signal is X/1 — draw at the break, home turnaround to win the match (Half-Time/Full-Time).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Azam | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.46 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Azam is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Azam · 0.8 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Azam is 171% better for: goals scored per match.
1.41 goals / match - Azam · 0.52 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Azam is 229% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.41 goals / match - Azam · 1.35 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons
Azam scores in 68% of matches (15 of 22 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 30% (7 of 23 matches).
Tanzania Prisons scores in 39% of matches (9 of 23 matches), while Azam keeps a clean sheet in 77% (17 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Azam
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Azam is 99% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.73 pts / match - Azam · 0.87 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Azam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Azam
Tanzania Prisons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Azam | Liga | Tanzania Prisons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.82 | 2.10 | ▼ 1.87 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 23% | 35% | ▼ 26% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 38% | ▼ 35% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 77% | 40% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 57% | • 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 62% | ▼ 52% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- AzamGoalFaisal Salum
- AzamGoalIddy Seleman Nado
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Azam 0 - 1 - 0 Tanzania Prisons. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Azam vs Tanzania Prisons?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Azam 2:0 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Azam vs Tanzania Prisons?
Azam score 1.41 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.52. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 23% of Azam's matches and 26% of Tanzania Prisons's.
What form are Azam and Tanzania Prisons in?
Over the last 5 games Azam have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Azam vs Tanzania Prisons?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


