B68 vs KÍ: match statistics
B68 vs KÍ: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
B68 played KÍ in Faroe Islands Premier League (Faroe Islands). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Venue: Svangaskarð. Final score: 1:4.
Current form
B68: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. KÍ: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
B68 scores 1.33 and concedes 2.33 goals per match. KÍ scores 1.89 and concedes 0.56. League average: 2.46 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: B68 67%, KÍ 56%. Over 2.5: B68 67%, KÍ 22%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.
xG, shots and style
KÍ has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.31. B68: 9.9 shots per match, KÍ: 14.8.
Match halves
B68: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.11. KÍ: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
B68: 76-90+ (5 goals). KÍ: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Faroe Islands Premier League: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 43%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 5.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are visitors KÍ: on the road they have a record of 4 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, sit 3rd versus B68’s 7th and have a goal difference of 17:5 compared to 12:21. Offensively KÍ average 1.8 goals away with xG 2.32 and 19.4 shots per game (7.2 on target), while B68 at home have 1.75 goals, xG 1.39 and 10.25 shots (4.75 on target); KÍ therefore create significantly more high-quality chances despite a lower finishing rate 9% versus B68’s 17%. Defensively the visitors’ advantage is clear: KÍ concede only 0.6 goals away and have 40% clean sheets, while B68 concede 1.25 goals at home and have no clean sheets in home matches; in the last 5 matches KÍ conceded 3 goals, B68 conceded 7. Form supports KÍ’s edge — the visitors scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches and have the sequence WWDDW (3 wins, 2 draws) averaging 2.2 points, hosts have 8 scored and 7 conceded in form WDL DW averaging 1.6 points per game. Considering the superior defense (0.6 vs 1.25), higher xG (2.32 vs 1.39) and advantage in shots (19.4 vs 10.25), I tip an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean towards BTTS - Yes because KÍ creates many chances: xG 2.32 and on average 19.4 shots with 7.2 on target per match versus B68 with xG 1.27 and 9.0 shots. Despite fewer attempts, B68 shows high finishing efficiency at 22% and a seasonal goals average of 2.0, so they can score even with limited chances. In the last 5 matches KÍ scored a total of 10 goals (2.0 per game) and conceded 3 (0.6), while B68 scored 8 (1.6) and conceded 7 (1.4), indicating both sides currently have realistic scoring potential. Counterarguments are seasonal clean sheets of 50% for B68 and 40% for KÍ and a league BTTS level of 49%, but KÍ’s offensive superiority and B68’s high conversion rate provide a stronger signal for Both Teams To Score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects 1.13 xG for B68 and 1.57 xG for KÍ, yielding a combined expected goals total of 2.70 (calculated as the average of team attack xG and opponent defense xG: (1.27+0.98)/2 and (2.32+0.82)/2). Based on this, I assign an 88% probability to Over 1.5: KÍ records Over 1.5 in 80% of matches this season, B68 in 50%, additionally 50% of home games and 60% of away games have seen both teams score; in the last 5 matches home games averaged 3.0 goals (8 scored + 7 conceded = 15/5), and away games averaged 2.6 goals (10+3=13/5). I rate Over 2.5 at 60% because the expected 2.70 exceeds 2.5, the away side generates 2.32 xG with 19.4 shots and 7.2 on target, and the home side has a high conversion rate of 22% from 9.0 shots, which raises the real chance of 3+ goals despite seasonal Over2.5 rates of only 25% and 20%. Over 3.5 is unlikely (28%) given seasonal Over3.5 rates of just 25% (B68) and 20% (KÍ) and a league average of 2.44 goals per match. I therefore recommend Over 1.5 as the best line to play due to the strong model total of 2.70 goals and the cumulative offensive pressure from KÍ (xG 2.32, 19.4 shots, 7.2 on target).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal figures show the home team strongly dominates the first half: they led at the break in 3 of 4 matches (75%), score on average 1.25 goals by half-time and concede none before the break (average goals conceded at half-time 0.0, 100% clean sheets at half-time). The away team, however, creates significantly more chances and posts higher xG — away xG is 2.32 versus 1.27 for hosts, average shots 19.4 versus 9.0 and shots on target 7.2 versus 3.5, with lower finishing efficiency (conversion 9% for away versus 22% for home). In second halves the visitors perform better: they earn an average of 2.2 points in second halves (11 points in total) and win 60% of second halves, while hosts have 1.25 points and only 25% wins in that period, suggesting the visitors’ ability to mount a turnaround after the break. On that basis the most likely scenario is the home side leading at half-time with the away side reversing the result after the break (HT 1 → FT 2), which I assign 35%; other distributions (1/1 20%, 1/X 10%, X/2 12% and smaller probabilities for remaining scorelines) reflect the home advantage at half-time and the away advantage in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| B68 | KÍ | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KÍ is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - B68 · 1.8 pts / match - KÍ
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KÍ is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - B68 · 1.89 goals / match - KÍ
KÍ is 316% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.33 goals / match - B68 · 0.56 goals / match - KÍ
B68 scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while KÍ keeps a clean sheet in 44% (4 of 9 matches).
KÍ scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while B68 keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - B68
Over / Under - KÍ
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KÍ is 142% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.78 pts / match - B68 · 1.89 pts / match - KÍ
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
B68 - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KÍ - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 44%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
B68
KÍ
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Faroe Islands Premier League).
Teams vs league
| B68 | Liga | KÍ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.67 | 2.46 | • 2.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 50% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 43% | ▼ 22% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 32% | ▲ 44% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 61% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): B68 0 - 1 - 3 KÍ. Average goals 5.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of B68 vs KÍ?
The Faroe Islands Premier League match finished B68 1:4 KÍ. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between B68 and KÍ?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches B68 won 0, KÍ won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 5.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before B68 vs KÍ?
B68 score 1.33 goals per game on average and KÍ 1.89. The Faroe Islands Premier League average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 67% of B68's matches and 56% of KÍ's.
What form are B68 and KÍ in?
Over the last 5 games B68 have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and KÍ 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for B68 vs KÍ?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for B68 vs KÍ: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


