Bahardar vs Sidama Bunna: match statistics
Bahardar vs Sidama Bunna: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bahardar played Sidama Bunna in Ethiopia Premier League (Ethiopia). The match was played on 28 June 2026. Venue: Bahir Dar Stadium. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Bahardar: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Sidama Bunna: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bahardar scores 0.72 and concedes 0.69 goals per match. Sidama Bunna scores 1.17 and concedes 0.61. League average: 1.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bahardar 31%, Sidama Bunna 33%. Over 2.5: Bahardar 17%, Sidama Bunna 28%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Sidama Bunna has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.23. Bahardar: 8.1 shots per match, Sidama Bunna: 8.0.
Match halves
Bahardar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.50. Sidama Bunna: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Bahardar: 46-60 (8 goals). Sidama Bunna: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ethiopia Premier League: 1.77 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Sidama Bunna (1st), who have scored 42 goals this season versus Bahardar’s 26 (10th); in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 7 goals compared to the hosts’ 3. Sidama average 1.28 goals per away match with a conversion rate of 15%, while Bahardar at home average 0.72 goals with a 9% conversion, with a similar number of shots per game (8.28 vs 8.65) and a higher number of shots on target for the visitors (3.61 vs 3.18). Defenses are comparable — Bahardar concede 0.83 goals per home game, Sidama 0.78 away, and xG shows 1.31 for Bahardar at home versus 1.29 for Sidama away, which suggests Sidama’s superior efficiency is the differentiator. Sidama also display better recent form in points—2.0 points per game over the last 5 fixtures versus 1.2 for Bahardar; in that span Sidama recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, while Bahardar had 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with Bahardar failing to score in 56% of home matches versus 33% of Sidama away matches without goals. Considering the advantage in goals scored (42 vs 26), higher conversion (15% vs 9%) and stronger recent form, I predict a Sidama victory, although Bahardar’s high rate of draws at home (56%) leaves a moderate chance of a points share.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Bahardar is very solid defensively — just 0.44 goals conceded per match and 67% clean sheets this season, with a seasonal BTTS of 22% and 20% in the last 5 matches. Sidama Bunna has the better attack (1.28 goals per match seasonally, 1.4 in the last 5 matches and 7 goals in those 5 fixtures) and a seasonal BTTS of 44%, so the visitors are capable of scoring. Although the xG for both sides is similar (1.20 for Bahardar vs 1.29 for Sidama), the league is characterized by a low average of 1.77 goals per match and a very high clean sheet rate of 81%, which overall reduces BTTS probability. The comparison of rates — 67% clean sheets for Bahardar versus 39% for Sidama and a lower over 2.5 for the hosts (11% vs 44%) — indicates the hosts' defense matters more than the visitors' attack. Therefore I assess the 'No' (Both Teams To Score - No) scenario as stronger: 72% for 'no' and 28% for 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.13 goals for Bahardar and 1.12 for Sidama Bunna (total 2.25), calculated as the average of team attacking xG (1.20 and 1.29) and opponent defensive xG (1.06 and 0.94). For a total of 2.25 goals the Poisson distribution translates to roughly a 65.8% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), 39.1% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and 19.0% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal signals are mixed: Over 1.5 occurred 50% of the time for the home side and 56% for the away side (average ~53%), but Over 2.5 is 11% for Bahardar and 44% for Sidama (average ~28%), which limits confidence on the 2.5 line. Additionally Sidama averages 3.61 shots on target and 1.29 xG per match, increasing offensive risk, while Bahardar defends very well (67% clean sheets and only 0.44 goals conceded seasonally), so I expect 2 rather than 3+ goals. As a result the strongest signal is the over on the 1.5 line (pick: Over 1.5) with an estimated ~66% probability, while Over 2.5 and 3.5 have smaller edges (39% and 19%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a draw at Half-Time because Bahardar records as many as 94% clean sheets at the break and concedes only 0.06 goals on average in the first half, while Sidama scores 0.67 goals before the break on average. Bahardar draws at the break in 67% of matches and scores only 0.39 goals on average before the break, which strongly limits the likelihood of them trailing after 45 minutes. In the second half the home side are more effective — Bahardar scores 0.67 goals on average after the break and has 72% of matches with more than 0.5 goals in the second half, while keeping 67% clean sheets for the full match, which increases the chance of a home win after a draw at Half-Time. Sidama have better form in the last five matches (60% wins vs. 20% for Bahardar) and similar xG (1.29 versus 1.2), so an away win is possible, but the strongest signal from the data is a draw at Half-Time and a Bahardar turnaround to win Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bahardar | Sidama Bunna | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sidama Bunna is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Bahardar · 2 pts / match - Sidama Bunna
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sidama Bunna is 63% better for: goals scored per match.
0.72 goals / match - Bahardar · 1.17 goals / match - Sidama Bunna
Sidama Bunna is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.69 goals / match - Bahardar · 0.61 goals / match - Sidama Bunna
Bahardar scores in 47% of matches (17 of 36 matches), while Sidama Bunna keeps a clean sheet in 53% (19 of 36 matches).
Sidama Bunna scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while Bahardar keeps a clean sheet in 56% (20 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bahardar
Over / Under - Sidama Bunna
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sidama Bunna is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Bahardar · 1.53 pts / match - Sidama Bunna
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bahardar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Sidama Bunna - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bahardar
Sidama Bunna
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ethiopia Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Bahardar | Liga | Sidama Bunna | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.42 | 1.77 | • 1.78 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 31% | 40% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 17% | 28% | • 28% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 40% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 36% | 55% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 47% | 59% | ▲ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Sidama BunnaGoalHabtamu Tadesse Zewede
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bahardar 0 - 1 - 0 Sidama Bunna. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bahardar vs Sidama Bunna?
The Ethiopia Premier League match finished Bahardar 0:1 Sidama Bunna. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bahardar vs Sidama Bunna?
Bahardar score 0.72 goals per game on average and Sidama Bunna 1.17. The Ethiopia Premier League average is 1.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 31% of Bahardar's matches and 33% of Sidama Bunna's.
What form are Bahardar and Sidama Bunna in?
Over the last 5 games Bahardar have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Sidama Bunna 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bahardar vs Sidama Bunna?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bahardar vs Sidama Bunna: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


