Bandırmaspor vs Amed: match statistics
Bandırmaspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bandırmaspor play Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match date is 19 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Bandırmaspor: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Amed: 0-4-1, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bandırmaspor scores 1.24 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Amed scores 2.13 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.92 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bandırmaspor 39%, Amed 55%. Over 2.5: Bandırmaspor 34%, Amed 58%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.20. Bandırmaspor: 10.6 shots per match, Amed: 15.5.
Match halves
Bandırmaspor: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.71. Amed: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.16.
Goals by minute
Bandırmaspor: 31-45+ (10 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.92 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
The away side are favorites: Amed sit 2nd and have scored 77 goals this season versus Bandırmaspor's 43, and in the last 5 matches Amed have scored 14 goals while the hosts managed only 1. The visitors show better form — 3 wins and 2 draws in their last 5 (avg 2.2 pts/match) versus Bandırmaspor's 1 win and 4 draws (1.4 pts/match). Amed's attacking superiority is also visible in averages: 1.94 goals per away match vs the hosts' 1.41 goals at home, higher xG 1.42 vs 1.34 and a higher conversion rate 16% vs 12%. Still, Bandırmaspor defend solidly at home — conceding only 0.76 goals per home match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 59% of home games, which raises the risk of a draw. Taking into account the clear attacking advantage of the visitors and their better recent results, I predict an Amed win, although the hosts may limit the margin of defeat.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bandırmaspor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Bandırmaspor is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Bandırmaspor · 0.8 pts / match - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 72% better for: goals scored per match.
1.24 goals / match - Bandırmaspor · 2.13 goals / match - Amed
Bandırmaspor is 25% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.89 goals / match - Bandırmaspor · 1.11 goals / match - Amed
Bandırmaspor scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 34% (13 of 38 matches).
Amed scores in 84% of matches (32 of 38 matches), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 45% (17 of 38 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Bandırmaspor
Over / Under — Amed
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 18% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.45 pts / match - Bandırmaspor · 1.71 pts / match - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bandırmaspor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bandırmaspor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Bandırmaspor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.13 | 2.92 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 39% | 50% | ▲ 55% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 34% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 29% | ▲ 34% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 63% | 71% | ▼ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 80% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bandırmaspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bandırmaspor vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished Bandırmaspor 2:0 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bandırmaspor vs Amed?
Bandırmaspor score 1.24 goals per game on average and Amed 2.13. The 1. Lig average is 2.92 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Bandırmaspor's matches and 55% of Amed's.
What form are Bandırmaspor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Bandırmaspor have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Amed 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bandırmaspor vs Amed?
The statistical background for Bandırmaspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.