Türkiye - 1. LigData current as of 07 September 2026

Bandırmaspor vs Amed: match statistics

Bandırmaspor crest
Bandırmaspor
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Amed crest
Amed

Bandırmaspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Bandırmaspor played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Bandırmaspor: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Amed: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Bandırmaspor scores 1.23 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Amed scores 2.20 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.91 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Bandırmaspor 40%, Amed 54%. Over 2.5: Bandırmaspor 37%, Amed 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Amed has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.21. Bandırmaspor: 10.8 shots per match, Amed: 15.3.

Match halves

Bandırmaspor: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69. Amed: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.20.

Goals by minute

Bandırmaspor: 31-45+ (10 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Lig: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The away side are favorites: Amed sit 2nd and have scored 77 goals this season versus Bandırmaspor's 43, and in the last 5 matches Amed have scored 14 goals while the hosts managed only 1. The visitors show better form — 3 wins and 2 draws in their last 5 (avg 2.2 pts/match) versus Bandırmaspor's 1 win and 4 draws (1.4 pts/match). Amed's attacking superiority is also visible in averages: 1.94 goals per away match vs the hosts' 1.41 goals at home, higher xG 1.42 vs 1.34 and a higher conversion rate 16% vs 12%. Still, Bandırmaspor defend solidly at home — conceding only 0.76 goals per home match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 59% of home games, which raises the risk of a draw. Taking into account the clear attacking advantage of the visitors and their better recent results, I predict an Amed win, although the hosts may limit the margin of defeat.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 56% (Bandırmaspor at home) and 53% (Amed away), averaging around 54% versus the league average of 49%. Bandırmaspor scores 2.44 goals at home with xG_for 1.97, but concedes only 0.72 goals per game and keeps a clean sheet in 44% of matches, which favors a low opponent return. Amed are in strong attacking form — 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 avg) and 60% BTTS in those five fixtures; seasonally away they score 1.94 goals with xG_for 1.42, so they have the potential to find the hosts’ net. Although the home side have 0% BTTS in the last 5 matches and have conceded 0.0 on average in that run, the aggregate chance volume (Bandırmaspor 6.56 shots on target and 18.11 shots overall per game) combined with the xG advantage and seasonal tendencies lead me to expect both teams to score. Consequently, considering the seasonal 56%/53% and Amed’s attacking form, I assign the “BTTS - Yes” scenario a 62% probability versus 38% for “No Goal”.}

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a high goal potential for both teams: Bandırmaspor averages 2.44 goals per match, Amed 1.94, with xG of 1.97 (home) and 1.42 (away) respectively. Comparing the offensive xG to the opponent’s defensive xG yields an expected 1.61 goals for Bandırmaspor ((1.97+1.25)/2) and 1.25 for Amed ((1.42+1.08)/2), totaling 2.86 goals. Seasonal percentages confirm a high frequency of matches with at least 2 goals: Bandırmaspor have 78% of matches over 1.5 goals, Amed 94%; over 2.5 goals are 61% (home) and 59% (away), above the league average of 54%. Based on this I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at ~86%, Over 2.5 at ~66%, while Over 3.5 is much weaker — ~31%, since season rates of 33%/29% and total xG of 2.86 do not favor frequent 4+ goal games. I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: the high frequency of matches >1.5 (78% vs 94%) and the expected 2.86 goals give this option a clear edge over the under.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Bandırmaspor were leading at half-time in 9 matches, representing 50% of games (leadingAtHT_home = 9, leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 50%), while winning 78% of their home matches overall (winPercentage_home = 78%), which strongly favors a scenario of the home side leading at the break and winning. At half-time the hosts score on average 1.11 goals and concede only 0.28 (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.11, concededAVGHT_home = 0.28), so they have a clear advantage in the first half. Their average xG is 1.97 versus 1.25 for the opponent defensively (xg_for_avg_home = 1.97 vs xg_against_avg_away = 1.25), and they also register more shots and shots on target (18.11 vs 12.29 shots, 6.56 vs 4.59 shots on target), which increases the likelihood of converting that advantage into goals. The hosts rarely trail at half-time (trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 6%) and have not recorded any home losses this season (losePercentage_home = 0), therefore the strongest signal points to 1/1 (HT/FT: home/home).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
BandırmasporAmed
9Shots18
BandırmasporAmed
5Shots on target4
BandırmasporAmed
1.22xG1.77
BandırmasporAmed
2Corners10
BandırmasporAmed
40Dangerous attacks50
BandırmasporAmed
16Fouls14
BandırmasporAmed
3Cards4
BandırmasporAmed

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.23Goals scored / match2.2
BandırmasporAmed
0.94Goals conceded / match1.03
BandırmasporAmed
45%Average possession53%
BandırmasporAmed
3.74Shots on target / match5.6
BandırmasporAmed

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.83Shots per match15.29
BandırmasporAmed
3.74Shots on target5.6
BandırmasporAmed
11.3%Shot conversion14.4%
BandırmasporAmed
45%Possession53%
BandırmasporAmed
1.21xG for1.7
BandırmasporAmed
1.34xG against1.16
BandırmasporAmed

Shooting quality

Bandırmaspor: BalancedAmed: Attacking
BandırmasporAmed
Accuracy (shots on target)35%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Amed is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Bandırmaspor · 2.2 pts / match - Amed

Bandırmaspor
DDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W31% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-11-10
1.51 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Amed
WWWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
60% W26% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
21-9-5
2.06 pts / match · goal difference +41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-5-5
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 0.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amed is 79% better for: goals scored per match.

1.23 goals / match - Bandırmaspor · 2.2 goals / match - Amed

Bandırmaspor is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Bandırmaspor · 1.03 goals / match - Amed

Bandırmaspor scoring profile: strong

Bandırmaspor scores in 69% of matches (24 of 35 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 37% (13 of 35 matches).

Amed scoring profile: strong

Amed scores in 86% of matches (30 of 35 matches), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 43% (15 of 35 matches).

43Goals scored (season)77
BandırmasporAmed
33Goals conceded (season)36
BandırmasporAmed
2.17Average goals in match3.23
BandırmasporAmed
1Goals scored (last 5)14
BandırmasporAmed
0Goals conceded (last 5)4
BandırmasporAmed

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal86%
BandırmasporAmed
31%2 goals60%
BandırmasporAmed
14%3 goals29%
BandırmasporAmed
9%4 goals20%
BandırmasporAmed

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal63%
BandırmasporAmed
23%2 goals29%
BandırmasporAmed
11%3 goals9%
BandırmasporAmed
3%4 goals3%
BandırmasporAmed

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time26%
BandırmasporAmed
0%BTTS in both halves9%
BandırmasporAmed
26%Scored in both halves37%
BandırmasporAmed

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
BandırmasporAmed
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
BandırmasporAmed
0%BTTS - last 560%
BandırmasporAmed

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
BandırmasporAmed
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
BandırmasporAmed
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
BandırmasporAmed

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
BandırmasporAmed
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time51%
BandırmasporAmed
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
BandırmasporAmed

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Amed is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / match - Bandırmaspor · 1.77 pts / match - Amed

Bandırmaspor - half-time state
31% leading49% draw20% trailing
Amed - half-time state
46% leading40% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per match (1st half)1.77
BandırmasporAmed
0.54Goals scored (1st half)1
BandırmasporAmed
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
BandırmasporAmed
0.97Average goals (1st half)1.46
BandırmasporAmed
66%Clean sheet before half-time63%
BandırmasporAmed
54%No goal before half-time40%
BandırmasporAmed

After half-time (2nd half)

1.49Points per match (2nd half)1.8
BandırmasporAmed
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
BandırmasporAmed
0.51Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
BandırmasporAmed
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.77
BandırmasporAmed
66%Clean sheet after half-time57%
BandırmasporAmed
51%No goal after half-time37%
BandırmasporAmed

Bandırmaspor - second-half results

37% W37% R26% P
50
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding129%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amed - second-half results

51% W26% R23% P
62
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+19
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
+22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Bandırmaspor - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match0.20.0
1 goal20%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amed - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.60
Goals scored / match1.21.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+4+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Bandırmaspor
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
10
10
31-45
9
4
46-60
7
8
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Amed
ScoredConceded
7
2
0-15
11
7
16-30
17
7
31-45
15
1
46-60
8
8
61-75
19
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Bandırmaspor

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.42
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-13.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Amed

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).

Teams vs league

BandırmasporLigaAmed
Average goals in match 2.172.91 3.23
Both teams scored 40%50% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%54% 60%
Clean sheets 43%29% 37%
Goal before half-time 66%72% 71%
Goal after half-time 69%79% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.26
Away goals / match
+31%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AmedRed cardMehmet Murat Uçar
  2. BandırmasporYellow cardEnes Aydın
  3. BandırmasporGoalEmirhan AcarAssist: Kerim Alıcı
  4. BandırmasporGoalAmidou Badji
  5. AmedSubstitutionOn: Dia Sabi'AOff: Adama Traoré
  6. BandırmasporSubstitutionOn: Oğuz CeylanOff: Emirhan Acar
  7. BandırmasporYellow cardOğuz Ceylan
  8. AmedYellow cardSinan Kurt
  9. AmedYellow cardFelix Ohene Afena-Gyan
  10. BandırmasporYellow cardArda Özçimen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ozan ErgünMatches officiated: 8
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 275%Home wins13%Draws13%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Bandırmaspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Bandırmaspor vs Amed?

The 1. Lig match finished Bandırmaspor 2:0 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Bandırmaspor vs Amed?

Bandırmaspor score 1.23 goals per game on average and Amed 2.20. The 1. Lig average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Bandırmaspor's matches and 54% of Amed's.

What form are Bandırmaspor and Amed in?

Over the last 5 games Bandırmaspor have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Amed 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bandırmaspor vs Amed?

The statistical background for Bandırmaspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.