Bandırmaspor vs Amed: match statistics
Bandırmaspor vs Amed: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bandırmaspor played Amed in 1. Lig (Türkiye). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Bandırmaspor: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Amed: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bandırmaspor scores 1.23 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Amed scores 2.20 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bandırmaspor 40%, Amed 54%. Over 2.5: Bandırmaspor 37%, Amed 60%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Amed has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.21. Bandırmaspor: 10.8 shots per match, Amed: 15.3.
Match halves
Bandırmaspor: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69. Amed: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
Bandırmaspor: 31-45+ (10 goals). Amed: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1. Lig: 2.91 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The away side are favorites: Amed sit 2nd and have scored 77 goals this season versus Bandırmaspor's 43, and in the last 5 matches Amed have scored 14 goals while the hosts managed only 1. The visitors show better form — 3 wins and 2 draws in their last 5 (avg 2.2 pts/match) versus Bandırmaspor's 1 win and 4 draws (1.4 pts/match). Amed's attacking superiority is also visible in averages: 1.94 goals per away match vs the hosts' 1.41 goals at home, higher xG 1.42 vs 1.34 and a higher conversion rate 16% vs 12%. Still, Bandırmaspor defend solidly at home — conceding only 0.76 goals per home match on average and keeping a clean sheet in 59% of home games, which raises the risk of a draw. Taking into account the clear attacking advantage of the visitors and their better recent results, I predict an Amed win, although the hosts may limit the margin of defeat.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 56% (Bandırmaspor at home) and 53% (Amed away), averaging around 54% versus the league average of 49%. Bandırmaspor scores 2.44 goals at home with xG_for 1.97, but concedes only 0.72 goals per game and keeps a clean sheet in 44% of matches, which favors a low opponent return. Amed are in strong attacking form — 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 avg) and 60% BTTS in those five fixtures; seasonally away they score 1.94 goals with xG_for 1.42, so they have the potential to find the hosts’ net. Although the home side have 0% BTTS in the last 5 matches and have conceded 0.0 on average in that run, the aggregate chance volume (Bandırmaspor 6.56 shots on target and 18.11 shots overall per game) combined with the xG advantage and seasonal tendencies lead me to expect both teams to score. Consequently, considering the seasonal 56%/53% and Amed’s attacking form, I assign the “BTTS - Yes” scenario a 62% probability versus 38% for “No Goal”.}
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a high goal potential for both teams: Bandırmaspor averages 2.44 goals per match, Amed 1.94, with xG of 1.97 (home) and 1.42 (away) respectively. Comparing the offensive xG to the opponent’s defensive xG yields an expected 1.61 goals for Bandırmaspor ((1.97+1.25)/2) and 1.25 for Amed ((1.42+1.08)/2), totaling 2.86 goals. Seasonal percentages confirm a high frequency of matches with at least 2 goals: Bandırmaspor have 78% of matches over 1.5 goals, Amed 94%; over 2.5 goals are 61% (home) and 59% (away), above the league average of 54%. Based on this I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at ~86%, Over 2.5 at ~66%, while Over 3.5 is much weaker — ~31%, since season rates of 33%/29% and total xG of 2.86 do not favor frequent 4+ goal games. I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the strongest signal: the high frequency of matches >1.5 (78% vs 94%) and the expected 2.86 goals give this option a clear edge over the under.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Bandırmaspor were leading at half-time in 9 matches, representing 50% of games (leadingAtHT_home = 9, leadingAtHTPercentage_home = 50%), while winning 78% of their home matches overall (winPercentage_home = 78%), which strongly favors a scenario of the home side leading at the break and winning. At half-time the hosts score on average 1.11 goals and concede only 0.28 (scoredAVGHT_home = 1.11, concededAVGHT_home = 0.28), so they have a clear advantage in the first half. Their average xG is 1.97 versus 1.25 for the opponent defensively (xg_for_avg_home = 1.97 vs xg_against_avg_away = 1.25), and they also register more shots and shots on target (18.11 vs 12.29 shots, 6.56 vs 4.59 shots on target), which increases the likelihood of converting that advantage into goals. The hosts rarely trail at half-time (trailingAtHTPercentage_home = 6%) and have not recorded any home losses this season (losePercentage_home = 0), therefore the strongest signal points to 1/1 (HT/FT: home/home).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bandırmaspor | Amed | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Amed is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Bandırmaspor · 2.2 pts / match - Amed
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Amed is 79% better for: goals scored per match.
1.23 goals / match - Bandırmaspor · 2.2 goals / match - Amed
Bandırmaspor is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Bandırmaspor · 1.03 goals / match - Amed
Bandırmaspor scores in 69% of matches (24 of 35 matches), while Amed keeps a clean sheet in 37% (13 of 35 matches).
Amed scores in 86% of matches (30 of 35 matches), while Bandırmaspor keeps a clean sheet in 43% (15 of 35 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bandırmaspor
Over / Under - Amed
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Amed is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Bandırmaspor · 1.77 pts / match - Amed
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bandırmaspor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Amed - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bandırmaspor
Amed
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Lig).
Teams vs league
| Bandırmaspor | Liga | Amed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.17 | 2.91 | ▲ 3.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 29% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 66% | 72% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- BandırmasporGoalAmidou Badji
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Bandırmaspor 0 - 0 - 1 Amed. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bandırmaspor vs Amed?
The 1. Lig match finished Bandırmaspor 2:0 Amed. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Bandırmaspor vs Amed?
Bandırmaspor score 1.23 goals per game on average and Amed 2.20. The 1. Lig average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Bandırmaspor's matches and 54% of Amed's.
What form are Bandırmaspor and Amed in?
Over the last 5 games Bandırmaspor have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Amed 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bandırmaspor vs Amed?
The statistical background for Bandırmaspor vs Amed — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


