Bangor vs Carrick Rangers: match statistics
Bangor vs Carrick Rangers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Bangor played Carrick Rangers in NIFL Premiership (Northern Ireland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 0:3.
Current form
Bangor: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Carrick Rangers: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Bangor scores 1.08 and concedes 1.61 goals per match. Carrick Rangers scores 1.61 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Bangor 56%, Carrick Rangers 67%. Over 2.5: Bangor 50%, Carrick Rangers 58%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Carrick Rangers has higher xG: 1.33 vs 1.12. Bangor: 8.2 shots per match, Carrick Rangers: 9.8.
Match halves
Bangor: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.56. Carrick Rangers: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Bangor: 31-45+ (12 goals). Carrick Rangers: 31-45+ (20 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NIFL Premiership: 2.86 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Carrick Rangers hold a clear offensive edge: they score on average 1.53 goals away, while Bangor score only 1.00 at home, and in the last 5 matches the visitors have netted 12 goals versus just 2 for the hosts. The visitors register more shots on target (4.24 vs 3.44) and have a higher conversion rate (15% vs 11%), which results in a lower share of matches without a goal: 18% for Carrick vs 39% for Bangor. Defensively the differences are marginal — Bangor concede 1.56 goals per home match, Carrick concede 1.47 away; xG for the visitors is 1.31 versus 1.26 for the hosts, while xG conceded for both teams is around 1.49, suggesting the visitors’ advantage is driven mainly by finishing. Additionally, Bangor’s home goal difference is -10, while the visitors have a positive away goal difference of +1, and over the last 5 matches Bangor average 1.2 points per game vs 1.4 for Carrick, giving the visitors a small but meaningful form advantage. Based on this I forecast an away win, estimating probabilities of 55% for a Carrick win, 25% for a draw and 20% for a Bangor win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a high seasonal BTTS rate: Bangor 68% and Carrick 65%, averaging ~66% which is clearly above the league average of 51%. However, the last 5 matches show a large divergence: Bangor has only 20% BTTS and scored a total of 2 goals (0.4 per game), while Carrick has 80% BTTS and 12 goals (2.4 per game), suggesting Carrick is far more likely to create scoring opportunities. Seasonal xG are 1.35 (Bangor) and 1.31 (Carrick) with xG against 1.38 and 1.49, and average season goals conceded are 1.63 and 1.47, so both teams both generate and concede chances. Clean sheets are rare (21% and 18%) and matches over 2.5 goals are frequent (63% and 53%), while the over2.5 + BTTS combination occurs often (57% and 47%). Therefore I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 65% versus 35% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG- and season-average based model projects total expected goals around 2.77: 1.42 for Bangor (attacking xG 1.35 versus opponents allowing 1.49 xG) and 1.35 for Carrick (attacking xG 1.31 versus opponents allowing 1.38 xG). Both teams have a high share of matches where both sides scored: Bangor 68% and Carrick 65%, which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. Over 1.5 stats indicate this is highly probable — Bangor 79% and Carrick 82% of matches — therefore I assigned 86% to Over 1.5. I rate Over 2.5 moderately at 58% (seasonal 63% and 53%), and Over 3.5 is unlikely at about 33% (seasonal 32% and 35%). Considering xG 1.42 vs 1.35, the high shares of both-teams-to-score games and the last 5 fixtures (Bangor averaging 0.4 goals, Carrick 2.4), the strongest play is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Half-time statistics favor the visitors: Carrick led at the break in 41% of their matches compared to 32% for Bangor, with average first-half goals of 1.12 for Carrick vs 0.84 for the hosts. In the last five matches Carrick average 2.4 goals per game and have a 40% win rate, whereas Bangor have only 0.4 goals and a 20% win rate, indicating superior away form for the visitors. After the break the balance also favors Carrick: in the last five fixtures the visitors average 1.6 second-half goals versus 0.0 for the hosts, so the lead at the break is likely to be maintained or extended. xG figures are similar (1.35 for Bangor vs 1.31 for Carrick), so the difference stems from actual finishing and form rather than a quality gap; this justifies the 2/2 (lead at the break and Full-Time win for the visitors) selection. Additionally, high BTTS rates—68% for the hosts and 65% for the visitors—suggest both teams can score, but the strongest signal from the data is 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Bangor | Carrick Rangers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Carrick Rangers is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Bangor · 1.4 pts / match - Carrick Rangers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Carrick Rangers is 49% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Bangor · 1.61 goals / match - Carrick Rangers
Bangor scores in 67% of matches (24 of 36 matches), while Carrick Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 matches).
Carrick Rangers scores in 83% of matches (30 of 36 matches), while Bangor keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Bangor
Over / Under - Carrick Rangers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Carrick Rangers is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.22 pts / match - Bangor · 1.47 pts / match - Carrick Rangers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Bangor - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Carrick Rangers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (20 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Bangor
Carrick Rangers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NIFL Premiership).
Teams vs league
| Bangor | Liga | Carrick Rangers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.69 | 2.86 | ▲ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 56% | 51% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 54% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 27% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 76% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Bangor 0 - 1 - 2 Carrick Rangers. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Bangor vs Carrick Rangers?
The NIFL Premiership match finished Bangor 0:3 Carrick Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Bangor and Carrick Rangers?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Bangor won 0, Carrick Rangers won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Bangor vs Carrick Rangers?
Bangor score 1.08 goals per game on average and Carrick Rangers 1.61. The NIFL Premiership average is 2.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Bangor's matches and 67% of Carrick Rangers's.
What form are Bangor and Carrick Rangers in?
Over the last 5 games Bangor have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Carrick Rangers 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Bangor vs Carrick Rangers?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Bangor vs Carrick Rangers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


