Switzerland - Super LeagueData current as of 22 July 2026

Basel vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Basel crest
Basel
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper
155%(1.60)
X25%(4.15)
220%(4.20)

Basel sits in 4th place in the table and presents solid home form with 38% wins and just 23% losses at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference of +7 in home matches, scoring an average of 1.38 goals while conceding just 0.85 per match. Grasshopper occupies a distant 11th place with very poor away form—only 15% wins and a staggering 54% losses on the road, alongside a negative goal difference of -11. The visitors concede an average of 2 goals per away match and fail to keep a clean sheet in 85% of fixtures, which, combined with Basel's possession advantage (57%) and higher xG (2.0 vs 1.43), gives the hosts a clear edge. Recent results for both teams (Basel: 2 wins in the last 5 matches, Grasshopper: only 1 win) further confirm the hosts' advantage, though Basel's form is not ideal, leaving room for a draw or a surprise from the visitors.

Basel vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Basel play Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match date is 5 March 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Basel: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Basel scores 1.45 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.26 and concedes 1.95. League average: 3.29 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Basel 61%, Grasshopper 61%. Over 2.5: Basel 63%, Grasshopper 58%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Basel has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.41. Basel: 15.3 shots per match, Grasshopper: 12.5.

Match halves

Basel: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.79. Grasshopper: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

Basel: 31-45+ (13 goals). Grasshopper: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.29 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Basel sits in 4th place in the table and presents solid home form with 38% wins and just 23% losses at their own stadium. The hosts have a positive goal difference of +7 in home matches, scoring an average of 1.38 goals while conceding just 0.85 per match. Grasshopper occupies a distant 11th place with very poor away form—only 15% wins and a staggering 54% losses on the road, alongside a negative goal difference of -11. The visitors concede an average of 2 goals per away match and fail to keep a clean sheet in 85% of fixtures, which, combined with Basel's possession advantage (57%) and higher xG (2.0 vs 1.43), gives the hosts a clear edge. Recent results for both teams (Basel: 2 wins in the last 5 matches, Grasshopper: only 1 win) further confirm the hosts' advantage, though Basel's form is not ideal, leaving room for a draw or a surprise from the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
BaselGrasshopper
10Shots17
BaselGrasshopper
4Shots on target5
BaselGrasshopper
1.16xG1.77
BaselGrasshopper
4Corners9
BaselGrasshopper
34Dangerous attacks47
BaselGrasshopper
8Fouls11
BaselGrasshopper
2Cards5
BaselGrasshopper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.45Goals scored / match1.26
BaselGrasshopper
1.53Goals conceded / match1.95
BaselGrasshopper
55%Average possession45%
BaselGrasshopper
5.53Shots on target / match4.34
BaselGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.26Shots per match12.5
BaselGrasshopper
5.53Shots on target4.34
BaselGrasshopper
9.5%Shot conversion10.1%
BaselGrasshopper
55%Possession45%
BaselGrasshopper
1.71xG for1.41
BaselGrasshopper
1.66xG against1.62
BaselGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Basel: DominantGrasshopper: Balanced
BaselGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grasshopper is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Basel · 1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper

Basel
LWLLL
Season result split
42% W21% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-8-14
1.47 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-6-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Grasshopper
LLLWW
Season result split
21% W24% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-21
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-11
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.09Opponent xG: 1.86BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Basel is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - Basel · 1.26 goals / match - Grasshopper

Basel is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - Basel · 1.95 goals / match - Grasshopper

Basel scoring profile: very strong

Basel scores in 76% of matches (29 of 38 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Basel keeps a clean sheet in 24% (9 of 38 matches).

55Goals scored (season)48
BaselGrasshopper
58Goals conceded (season)74
BaselGrasshopper
2.97Average goals in match3.21
BaselGrasshopper
4Goals scored (last 5)8
BaselGrasshopper
13Goals conceded (last 5)9
BaselGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal71%
BaselGrasshopper
42%2 goals29%
BaselGrasshopper
21%3 goals18%
BaselGrasshopper
5%4 goals3%
BaselGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal87%
BaselGrasshopper
39%2 goals53%
BaselGrasshopper
26%3 goals26%
BaselGrasshopper
8%4 goals16%
BaselGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time21%
BaselGrasshopper
8%BTTS in both halves11%
BaselGrasshopper
34%Scored in both halves24%
BaselGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
BaselGrasshopper
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
BaselGrasshopper
40%BTTS - last 580%
BaselGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
BaselGrasshopper
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time37%
BaselGrasshopper
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
BaselGrasshopper

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
BaselGrasshopper
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
BaselGrasshopper
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
BaselGrasshopper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Basel is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.45 pts / match - Basel · 1.21 pts / match - Grasshopper

Basel - half-time state
37% leading34% draw29% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
29% leading34% draw37% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.45Points per match (1st half)1.21
BaselGrasshopper
0.66Goals scored (1st half)0.61
BaselGrasshopper
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
BaselGrasshopper
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.47
BaselGrasshopper
55%Clean sheet before half-time45%
BaselGrasshopper
50%No goal before half-time55%
BaselGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)0.89
BaselGrasshopper
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
BaselGrasshopper
0.89Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
BaselGrasshopper
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.74
BaselGrasshopper
39%Clean sheet after half-time29%
BaselGrasshopper
39%No goal after half-time50%
BaselGrasshopper

Basel - second-half results

29% W37% R34% P
55
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grasshopper - second-half results

18% W34% R47% P
46
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Basel - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.81.8
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.42.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Basel
ScoredConceded
8
9
0-15
4
9
16-30
13
6
31-45
10
15
46-60
9
9
61-75
11
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
11
31-45
5
13
46-60
9
19
61-75
11
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Basel

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

BaselLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match 2.973.29 3.21
Both teams scored 61%66% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%67% 58%
Clean sheets 24%19% 13%
Goal before half-time 79%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 82%85% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.29
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
19%
Clean sheets
1.78
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Basel 1 - 1 - 0 Grasshopper. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Grasshopper Club Zürich
1 : 1
FC Basel 1893
FC Basel 1893
2 : 1
Grasshopper Club Zürich

FAQ

What was the result of Basel vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Basel 1:0 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Basel and Grasshopper?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Basel won 1, Grasshopper won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Basel vs Grasshopper?

Basel score 1.45 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.26. The Super League average is 3.29 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 61% of Basel's matches and 61% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Basel and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Basel have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Grasshopper 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Basel vs Grasshopper?

The statistical background for Basel vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.