Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Haifa: match statistics
Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Haifa: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Beitar Jerusalem played Maccabi Haifa in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match was played on 19 April 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Current form
Beitar Jerusalem: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Maccabi Haifa: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Beitar Jerusalem scores 2.35 and concedes 1.12 goals per match. Maccabi Haifa scores 1.92 and concedes 1.08. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Beitar Jerusalem 69%, Maccabi Haifa 54%. Over 2.5: Beitar Jerusalem 65%, Maccabi Haifa 54%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Beitar Jerusalem has higher xG: 1.89 vs 1.87. Beitar Jerusalem: 16.3 shots per match, Maccabi Haifa: 15.8.
Match halves
Beitar Jerusalem: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.50. Maccabi Haifa: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 1.08.
Goals by minute
Beitar Jerusalem: 76-90+ (23 goals). Maccabi Haifa: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Israeli Premier League: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beitar Jerusalem (2nd) enters the match in excellent form — winning all 5 of their last 5 fixtures, scoring 24 goals and averaging 3 points per game, while Maccabi Haifa (5th) has a 2-0-3 record in their last 5 with 10 goals and an average of 1.2 points per game. At home Beitar averages 1.62 goals for and 0.92 against, with mean xG 1.92 and 5.77 shots on target, whereas Maccabi average 1.31 goals for, 1.00 against on the road, with xG 1.84 and 4.77 shots on target. Maccabi shows a high draw rate away (62%) and frequent clean sheets (46%), but has lower away win efficiency (23% wins vs 54% Beitar wins at home) and a higher away loss rate (15%). The gap in recent form and offensive output is significant — Beitar netted 24 goals in 5 matches versus Maccabi’s 10, and they have a higher shot conversion (10% vs 9%) plus more shots on target, translating into a tangible advantage in chance creation and finishing. Considering the form edge (5 wins vs 2) and attacking metrics including xG, I expect a home win; suggested probabilities: 65% Beitar, 20% draw, 15% Maccabi.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Beitar Jerusalem averages 2.54 goals scored and 1.15 conceded per match this season, while Maccabi Haifa have 1.31 scored and 1.00 conceded; this indicates a home offensive edge and a likelihood of goals from both sides. Expected goals (xG) are 1.90 for Beitar and 1.84 for Maccabi, with xG against of 1.10 and 1.37 respectively, showing both teams create chances. Season BTTS rates are 62% for Beitar and 46% for Maccabi, but in the last 5 matches BTTS rises to 80% vs 60%, delivering a strong signal for BTTS - Yes. Additionally, Beitar averages 5.85 shots on target and a 15% conversion versus 4.77 and 9% for Maccabi, and 77% of Beitar’s matches finish over 2.5 goals (Maccabi 31%), which supports the BTTS outcome. Considering the league average BTTS of 57% and recent form (last 5 matches: Beitar 4.8 goals scored vs Maccabi 2.0), I assess BTTS probability at 70% and No BTTS at 30%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The forecast indicates a high probability of at least 2 goals in the match: Beitar average 2.54 goals per home match, Maccabi 1.31 away, and season percentages of matches over 1.5 are 85% for Beitar and 69% for Maccabi, so I rate Over 1.5 at about 90%. The strongest signal is the 2.5 line — Beitar have 77% of home matches Over 2.5 and 80% in their last 5, Maccabi had Over 2.5 in 60% of their last 5, therefore I assess Over 2.5 at around 66%. xG analysis confirms this view: the hosts’ average xG 1.90 and the visitors’ defensive xG_against 1.37 yield an expected 1.64 goals for Beitar, while for Maccabi (xG_for 1.84 vs hosts’ xG_against 1.10) we get ~1.47 goals, totaling ~3.11 expected goals. The 3.5 line is less certain — season Over 3.5 is 62% for Beitar and 31% for Maccabi, but the expected 3.11 goals is below the 3.5 threshold, so I rate Under 3.5 at 59%; therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the best choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Beitar Jerusalem has a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 62% of matches and average 1.15 goals by halftime versus 0.54 for Maccabi Haifa, with average goals conceded by halftime of 0.23. Over the full match the hosts average 2.54 goals and win 62% of fixtures, and in their last 5 matches they have 5 wins (100%), while Maccabi won 40% of their last 5. xG is similar (1.90 for Beitar vs 1.84 for Maccabi), but the hosts are more efficient (shot conversion 15% vs 9%) and register more shots on target (5.85 vs 4.77), which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. Beitar virtually never trails at halftime (0% trailingAtHT_home) and have a strong second half (92% of matches with at least one goal after the break), so the most secure scenario is a lead at the break and a home win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Beitar Jerusalem | Maccabi Haifa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Beitar Jerusalem is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.4 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beitar Jerusalem is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
2.35 goals / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.92 goals / match - Maccabi Haifa
Beitar Jerusalem scores in 85% of matches (22 of 26 matches), while Maccabi Haifa keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).
Maccabi Haifa scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Beitar Jerusalem keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Beitar Jerusalem
Over / Under - Maccabi Haifa
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maccabi Haifa is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / match - Beitar Jerusalem · 1.73 pts / match - Maccabi Haifa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Beitar Jerusalem - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 65%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Maccabi Haifa - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (23 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +16 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Beitar Jerusalem
Maccabi Haifa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Beitar Jerusalem | Liga | Maccabi Haifa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.46 | 3.04 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 58% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 65% | 58% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 26% | ▲ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 66% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Beitar Jerusalem 1 - 1 - 0 Maccabi Haifa. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Haifa?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Beitar Jerusalem 3:0 Maccabi Haifa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Haifa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Beitar Jerusalem won 1, Maccabi Haifa won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Haifa?
Beitar Jerusalem score 2.35 goals per game on average and Maccabi Haifa 1.92. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Beitar Jerusalem's matches and 54% of Maccabi Haifa's.
What form are Beitar Jerusalem and Maccabi Haifa in?
Over the last 5 games Beitar Jerusalem have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Maccabi Haifa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Haifa?
The statistical background for Beitar Jerusalem vs Maccabi Haifa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.