Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of 07 November 2026

Beitar / Riga Mariners vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics

Beitar / Riga Mariners vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Beitar / Riga Mariners played JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Beitar / Riga Mariners: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. JDFS Alberts: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores 2.50 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. JDFS Alberts scores 2.13 and concedes 1.38. League average: 3.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Beitar / Riga Mariners 67%, JDFS Alberts 71%. Over 2.5: Beitar / Riga Mariners 75%, JDFS Alberts 67%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Beitar / Riga Mariners has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.83. Beitar / Riga Mariners: 12.3 shots per match, JDFS Alberts: 13.1.

Match halves

Beitar / Riga Mariners: half-time lead 54%, second-half goals 1.33. JDFS Alberts: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.29.

Goals by minute

Beitar / Riga Mariners: 31-45+ (16 goals). JDFS Alberts: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1. Liga: 3.71 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Beitar / Riga Mariners have the home advantage: they have won 64% of their home matches and have yet to lose, while JDFS Alberts have won 50% of their away fixtures. The hosts average 2.55 goals at home, compared with the visitors’ 2.00 goals away, and their average xG stands at 1.91 versus 1.68 for their opponents. The hosts also have the edge in shots on target per match (5.78 to 4.18) and concede fewer goals on average (1.18 to 1.50). In their last five matches, Beitar / Riga Mariners scored 15 goals and recorded 3 wins, but also conceded as many as 14, giving the visitors a genuine chance to get on the scoresheet. Despite this defensive weakness, the hosts’ superior attacking efficiency and results at home point to a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The both-teams-to-score scenario is supported by the seasonal BTTS rates: 58% for the hosts and 83% for the visitors, compared with a league average of 62%. JDFS Alberts score an average of 2.0 goals per match and have failed to score in none of their matches, while Beitar / Riga Mariners concede an average of 1.25 goals. The hosts score an average of 2.25 goals against an xG of 1.96, while the visitors concede an average of 1.5 goals and keep a clean sheet in only 17% of their matches. In their last 5 matches, the hosts conceded as many as 2.8 goals per game, and both teams scored in 80% of their appearances, further strengthening the case for BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line was cleared in 92% of the home team's matches and 100% of the away team's matches. Both teams average at least 2 goals per match—the home side 2.25 and the away side 2.00—supporting a forecast of 3.80 total goals. The home team's last five matches averaged 5.8 goals, while the away team's averaged 3.6; Over 2.5 goals landed in 100% and 80% of those matches, respectively. The Over 2.5 line also looks promising, but the season-long 67% rate for both teams gives it a smaller edge than Over 1.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: JDFS Alberts were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged just 0.6 goals before half-time over that period. The opening phase remains uncertain, however, as Beitar / Riga Mariners were trailing at half-time in 4 of their last 5 outings, despite having been level or ahead at the break in 84% of their matches across the season. The hosts’ attacking edge supports a full-time win: their average xG is 1.96 compared with their opponents’ 1.68, while they also average 7.25 shots on target against 4.18. The hosts scored an average of 1.42 goals after the break, rising to 2.0 across their last 5 matches, which boosts their chances of settling the contest in the second half. I therefore predict a draw at half-time and a Beitar / Riga Mariners win after 90 minutes, although the scenario in which the hosts take the lead at the break remains almost equally likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
11Shots11
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
10Shots on target5
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.76xG1.43
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
5Corners3
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
50Dangerous attacks53
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
12Fouls12
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
0Cards0
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
2.5Goals scored / match2.13
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.29Goals conceded / match1.38
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
48%Average possession52%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
5.79Shots on target / match5.5
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.33Shots per match13.13
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
5.79Shots on target5.5
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
20.3%Shot conversion16.2%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
48%Possession52%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.85xG for1.83
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.34xG against1.24
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

Shooting quality

Beitar / Riga Mariners: Efficient finishingJDFS Alberts: Efficient finishing
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
Accuracy (shots on target)47%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.39

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.4 pts / match - JDFS Alberts

Beitar / Riga Mariners
LWLWW
Season result split
67% W21% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-3
2.21 pts / match · goal difference +29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-0
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.61BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
JDFS Alberts
LLWDW
Season result split
54% W21% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-5-6
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 1.30BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

2.5 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 2.13 goals / match - JDFS Alberts

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.38 goals / match - JDFS Alberts

Beitar / Riga Mariners scoring profile: very strong

Beitar / Riga Mariners scores in 96% of matches (23 of 24 matches), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 25% (6 of 24 matches).

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 92% of matches (22 of 24 matches), while Beitar / Riga Mariners keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 matches).

60Goals scored (season)51
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
31Goals conceded (season)33
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
3.79Average goals in match3.5
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
15Goals scored (last 5)11
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
14Goals conceded (last 5)7
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

How often they score at least...

96%1 goal92%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
71%2 goals58%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
46%3 goals33%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
25%4 goals17%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal75%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
38%2 goals42%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
13%3 goals13%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
8%4 goals8%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

67%
Beitar / Riga Mariners - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 24 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time21%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
8%BTTS in both halves4%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
46%Scored in both halves29%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

BTTS and goal count

58%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
80%BTTS - last 560%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time54%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Beitar / Riga Mariners is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.79 pts / match - Beitar / Riga Mariners · 1.5 pts / match - JDFS Alberts

Beitar / Riga Mariners - half-time state
54% leading17% draw29% trailing
JDFS Alberts - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.79Points per match (1st half)1.5
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.08Goals scored (1st half)0.83
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.71Average goals (1st half)1.46
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
58%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
29%No goal before half-time50%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

After half-time (2nd half)

1.92Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)1.29
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
0.58Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
1.92Average goals (2nd half)2.04
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
50%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts
33%No goal after half-time29%
Beitar / Riga MarinersJDFS Alberts

Beitar / Riga Mariners - second-half results

58% W17% D25% L
43
Half-time points
26
Half-time goals
+11
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+18
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.79
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 54% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

50% W25% D25% L
36
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 54%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Beitar / Riga Mariners - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match1.02.0
Goals conceded / match1.81.0
Average goals in match2.83.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals80%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-4+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
JDFS Alberts - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.61.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Beitar / Riga Mariners
ScoredConceded
9
5
0-15
3
7
16-30
16
5
31-45
8
7
46-60
12
5
61-75
12
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (16 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
9
5
16-30
6
6
31-45
6
8
46-60
11
7
61-75
14
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
88%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Beitar / Riga Mariners

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Beitar / Riga MarinersLigaJDFS Alberts
Average goals in match• 3.793.71▼ 3.50
Both teams scored▲ 67%62%▲ 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 75%71%▼ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 29%21%▲ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%77%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 88%83%▲ 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.71
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
2.04
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
34%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Aleksandrs SinelnikovsA 1
—Elvis Stuglis⚽ 1 · A 1
—Yevhen Stadnik⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Matīss Zēģele⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Beitar / Riga MarinersGoalYevhen StadnikAssist: Elvis Stuglis
  2. Beitar / Riga MarinersGoalElvis StuglisAssist: Aleksandrs Sinelnikovs
  3. JDFS AlbertsGoalMatīss Zēģele

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Beitar / Riga Mariners 2 - 0 - 1 JDFS Alberts. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 33% matches.

JDFS Alberts
0 : 4
Beitar / Riga Mariners
JDFS Alberts
2 : 0
FK Beitar / Riga Mariners
FK Beitar / Riga Mariners
4 : 2
JDFS Alberts

FAQ

What was the result of Beitar / Riga Mariners vs JDFS Alberts?

The 1. Liga match finished Beitar / Riga Mariners 3:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Beitar / Riga Mariners and JDFS Alberts?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Beitar / Riga Mariners won 2, JDFS Alberts won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Beitar / Riga Mariners vs JDFS Alberts?

Beitar / Riga Mariners score 2.50 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.13. The 1. Liga average is 3.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Beitar / Riga Mariners's matches and 71% of JDFS Alberts's.

What form are Beitar / Riga Mariners and JDFS Alberts in?

Over the last 5 games Beitar / Riga Mariners have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Beitar / Riga Mariners vs JDFS Alberts?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.