Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 07 September 2026

BFC Daugavpils vs Liepāja: match statistics

BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Liepāja crest
Liepāja

BFC Daugavpils vs Liepāja: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BFC Daugavpils played Liepāja in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 4 July 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

BFC Daugavpils: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Liepāja: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.05 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Liepāja scores 1.29 and concedes 1.48. League average: 2.98 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 57%, Liepāja 52%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 38%, Liepāja 57%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

BFC Daugavpils has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.48. BFC Daugavpils: 12.8 shots per match, Liepāja: 12.3.

Match halves

BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.71. Liepāja: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (10 goals). Liepāja: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.98 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-3. Average goals 3.17, BTTS 83%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a BFC Daugavpils win (1) based on a clear home defensive advantage: the hosts concede just 0.75 goals per home game on average and have 42% clean sheets, while Liepāja concedes 2.0 goals per away match and records only 10% clean sheets. This season BFC scored 22 goals versus Liepāja’s 27, but in the last 5 matches the visitors scored 6 and conceded 8, whereas the hosts scored 3 and conceded 4 — indicating Liepāja is more dangerous offensively in the short term but more vulnerable at the back. Chance creation quality is balanced by xG (1.53 xG for the hosts at home vs 1.54 xG for the visitors away), however BFC register more on-target shots at home (4.58 on-target shots per match vs 3.4 for Liepāja) and have a higher shot conversion rate (7% vs 5%), which favors capitalizing on chances. Both teams average 1.2 points per game over the last 5 matches, so form is similar, but the clear defensive edge for the hosts and better home conversion of chances gives them a tangible advantage. Therefore I rate the hosts’ win probability as dominant, with a moderate chance of a draw and a lower probability of an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend 'No' (Both Teams To Score - No) as the more likely outcome in this match. The home team averages 1.82 goals this season and fails to score in 18% of matches (i.e., scores in ~82%), while the visitors average 0.70 goals and finish 50% of their matches without a goal, which significantly lowers the probability of a Goal/Goal. Season-long BTTS rates are 64% for BFC and 40% for Liepāja, but over the last 5 matches these values have dropped to 40% and 20%, indicating a trend reducing BTTS. xG is similar (xG 1.42 home vs 1.54 away), yet the visitors have a very low shot conversion of 5% and average 3.4 shots on target versus 5.0 for the hosts, so although chances are created, the visitors rarely convert them. Using a simple probability estimate by multiplying scoring probabilities (home ~82% × away ~50% ≈ 41%), I assign BTTS ~41% and No BTTS ~59%, hence the 'No' selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model and league context point to a high-scoring match: the league averages 2.98 goals per game, and my calculated expected xG is 1.47 for the home side (xG_for_home 1.42 vs xG_against_away 1.52) and 1.49 for the away side (xG_for_away 1.54 vs xG_against_home 1.43), totaling 2.96 goals. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.82 goals per game on average and has a season rate of matches over 1.5 goals of 91%, while Liepāja averages 0.70 goals and has over 1.5 in 70% of matches — this provides a strong signal for Over 1.5. At the 2.5 line there is a moderately strong signal: home teams have Over 2.5 in 64% of matches, the away side in 50%, and the league at 54%, so I estimate roughly a 62% chance of Over 2.5 with a combined xG ~2.96. Over 3.5 looks much less likely: homes have 18% of matches above 3.5, aways 40%, translating to about a 28% probability of Over 3.5, and the away side’s low finishing rate (conversion 5% vs 16% for the home team) limits the potential for many goals. The strongest and safest pick is Over 1.5 (bet: Over, line: 1.5) given the 91% and 70% Over 1.5 rates and the combined expected 2.96 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics favor the hosts: BFC Daugavpils led at the break in 7 matches (64% of appearances) and scores an average of 1.0 goals by half-time, while Liepāja has 0.2 goals at the break and concedes 1.2 goals before the interval on average. Over the season the hosts win 55% of matches with an average of 1.82 goals per game, whereas the visitors have only 20% wins and 0.7 goals per game, giving BFC the advantage for the Full-Time result. Despite similar xG (1.42 for the hosts vs 1.54 for the guests), the hosts are much more efficient in finishing chances (conversion rate 16% vs 5%) and register more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.4), which translates into a higher actual goal output. The hosts add on average 0.82 goals in the second half versus 0.5 for their opponents, so when leading 1:0 at the break they have a high probability of maintaining and extending the lead. On this basis the most reliable signal is HT/FT 1/1, which I estimate at 48% with the remaining scenarios distributed according to observed HT and FT distributions.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
14Shots15
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
8Shots on target6
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1.79xG1.93
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
2Corners7
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
48Dangerous attacks78
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
15Fouls13
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0Cards1
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1.05Goals scored / match1.29
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1.33Goals conceded / match1.48
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
47%Average possession52%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
4.62Shots on target / match4.24
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.76Shots per match12.29
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
4.62Shots on target4.24
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
8.2%Shot conversion10.5%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
47%Possession52%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1.52xG for1.48
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1.58xG against1.48
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

Shooting quality

BFC Daugavpils: BalancedLiepāja: Balanced
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

BFC Daugavpils
DDWDL
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-9
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Liepāja
WLLLW
Season result split
38% W19% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-4-9
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-6
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Liepāja is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.29 goals / match - Liepāja

BFC Daugavpils is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.48 goals / match - Liepāja

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 71% of matches (15 of 21 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

Liepāja scoring profile: strong

Liepāja scores in 67% of matches (14 of 21 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).

22Goals scored (season)27
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
28Goals conceded (season)31
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
2.38Average goals in match2.76
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
3Goals scored (last 5)6
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal67%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
24%2 goals38%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
10%3 goals14%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0%4 goals10%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal86%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
29%2 goals33%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
19%3 goals14%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
10%4 goals10%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

5%BTTS at half-time5%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
14%Scored in both halves24%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
40%BTTS - last 520%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

48%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
19%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time19%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Liepāja is 13% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.14 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.29 pts / match - Liepāja

BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
19% leading57% draw24% trailing
Liepāja - half-time state
38% leading14% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.14Points per match (1st half)1.29
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.62
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.76
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.38
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
71%Clean sheet before half-time48%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
76%No goal before half-time62%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

After half-time (2nd half)

0.95Points per match (2nd half)1.33
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.38
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
29%Clean sheet after half-time38%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja
38%No goal after half-time48%
BFC DaugavpilsLiepāja

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

14% W52% R33% P
24
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Liepāja - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
27
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match0.21.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
10
10
46-60
3
4
61-75
2
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
4
8
0-15
2
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
6
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.47
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

BFC DaugavpilsLigaLiepāja
Average goals in match 2.382.98 2.76
Both teams scored 57%56% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%55% 57%
Clean sheets 24%24% 14%
Goal before half-time 48%76% 86%
Goal after half-time 86%84% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+27%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: N'Guetta EkouOff: Irad Mshindi Ambugo
  2. BFC DaugavpilsGoalMamadou SyllaAssist: Abdoul Kader Traore
  3. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Djibril GueyeOff: Chovanie Amatkarijo
  4. BFC DaugavpilsGoalMamadou SyllaAssist: Joel Yakubu
  5. BFC DaugavpilsGoalMamadou SyllaAssist: Ziad Ouled-Haj-M'hand
  6. LiepājaYellow cardAmar Haïdara
  7. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Ņikita BarkovskisOff: Joel Yakubu
  8. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Ingars PūlisOff: Amar Haïdara
  9. LiepājaGoalDjibril Gueye

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): BFC Daugavpils 2 - 1 - 3 Liepāja. Average goals 3.17, both teams scored in 83% matches.

Liepāja
2 : 1
BFC Daugavpils
BFC Daugavpils
2 : 0
Liepāja
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
FK Liepāja
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
4 : 2
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Liepāja?

The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 3:1 Liepāja. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Liepāja?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 2, Liepāja won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Liepāja?

BFC Daugavpils score 1.05 goals per game on average and Liepāja 1.29. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 57% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 52% of Liepāja's.

What form are BFC Daugavpils and Liepāja in?

Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Liepāja 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Liepāja?

The statistical background for BFC Daugavpils vs Liepāja — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.