BFC Daugavpils vs Riga: match statistics
BFC Daugavpils vs Riga: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
BFC Daugavpils played Riga in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 25 June 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
BFC Daugavpils: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Riga: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
BFC Daugavpils scores 1.11 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Riga scores 3.16 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.97 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 58%, Riga 63%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 37%, Riga 89%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Riga has higher xG: 2.00 vs 1.53. BFC Daugavpils: 13.0 shots per match, Riga: 16.7.
Match halves
BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.74. Riga: half-time lead 74%, second-half goals 1.47.
Goals by minute
BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (10 goals). Riga: 31-45+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 2.83, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Riga are clear favorites: they have scored 60 goals this season versus 21 for BFC Daugavpils and have scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches compared to 3 goals by the hosts in the same period. The visitors create and convert significantly more chances — averaging 16.11 shots and 7 on target per match with a conversion rate of 21%, while the home side at home averages 12.73 shots and 4.55 on target with a 7% conversion. Higher xG for Riga (1.97 away vs 1.54 xG for the home team at home) and lower xG against (1.00 vs 1.49) demonstrate better chance quality and greater control of the game (possession 65% vs 48%). Form confirms this advantage — Riga have won 5 of their last 5 matches and average 3 points per match in this run, while BFC have only 1 win and average 1.2 points in their last 5. Although BFC concede only 0.82 goals per game at home and keep clean sheets in 36% of home matches, Riga’s high efficiency and the fact that the hosts fail to score in 45% of home games point to a bet on the visitors' win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Riga has a very high BTTS rate this season — 78% of matches — while BFC Daugavpils records 50% BTTS and the league averages 57% BTTS, which already favors a Both Teams To Score scenario. Both teams generate similar xG (BFC 2.04 vs Riga 1.97) and Riga registers more on-target shots (7.0 vs 5.6), increasing the likelihood of goals from their side. The form gap is clear: Riga scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per match) versus BFC’s 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6 per match), with Riga form WWWWW and BFC LDDDW. BFC has 50% clean sheets and concedes 0.9 goals per match on average, which somewhat limits BTTS, but Over 2.5 is 100% for Riga and 80% for BFC, and Riga’s Over2.5+BTTS combination is 78%, so high-scoring outcomes favor both teams scoring. Considering Riga’s dominant attacking strength (3.44 goals average this season and 15 goals in 5 matches), a high seasonal BTTS of 78% and xG ~2.0 on both sides, I assess BTTS as more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: BFC Daugavpils attack 2.04 and Riga attack 1.97, and xG against 0.85 (Daugavpils) and 1.00 (Riga), I calculated expected goals: 1.52 for the home side and 1.41 for the away side, totaling 2.93 goals. Seasonal statistics confirm a high goal frequency: Daugavpils has Over 2.5 in 80% of matches, Riga in 100%, and Over 1.5 occurs in 90% and 100% respectively; Over 3.5 appears in 60%/67%. A Poisson model for a total of 2.93 yields about a 56% chance of at least 3 goals, however taking into account seasonal rates (on average 90% for Over 2.5) and offensive strength (SOT 5.6 vs 7.0 and conversion 17% vs 21%) I adjusted the probability for Over 2.5 upward to approximately 76%. In the last 5 matches Daugavpils averaged 0.6 goals (3 in 5), while Riga averaged 3.0 goals (15 in 5), which increases the likelihood of early away goals and supports a scenario of at least 3 goals, even though Daugavpils’ last 5-match xG is 1.74 (indicating some chances). For these reasons I recommend betting on Over 2.5 as the strongest signal; approximate forecasts: Over1.5 89%/Under1.5 11%, Over2.5 76%/Under2.5 24%, Over3.5 52%/Under3.5 48%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Riga is in clear form: they have won 5 of their last 5 matches (100%), while BFC Daugavpils has only 1 win in 5 (20%). In those five meetings Riga led at the break in 5 of 5 (100%), and their average goals by half-time were 2.2 versus 0.0 for the hosts, which clearly indicates the visitors’ advantage already in the first half. On a seasonal level xG is similar (2.04 for BFC vs 1.97 for Riga), but Riga register more shots on target (7.0 vs 5.6) and have better conversion (21% vs 17%), which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. Although the hosts have an 80% home-win rate and 80% rate of leading at half-time this season, the hosts’ recent form (0% leads at the break in their last 5 matches) favors the visitors. Therefore my recommended pick is HT/FT 2/2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| BFC Daugavpils | Riga | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Riga is 150% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 3 pts / match - Riga
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Riga is 185% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 3.16 goals / match - Riga
Riga is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1 goals / match - Riga
BFC Daugavpils scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Riga keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 matches).
Riga scores in 100% of matches (19 of 19 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 21% (4 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
Over / Under - Riga
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Riga is 92% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.21 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 2.32 pts / match - Riga
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Riga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 74% of matches and wins 79%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +11 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
BFC Daugavpils
Riga
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| BFC Daugavpils | Liga | Riga | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.97 | ▲ 4.16 |
| Both teams scored | • 58% | 57% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 54% | ▲ 89% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 23% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 76% | ▲ 95% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 84% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): BFC Daugavpils 1 - 1 - 4 Riga. Average goals 2.83, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Riga?
The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 0:0 Riga. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Riga?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 1, Riga won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.83 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Riga?
BFC Daugavpils score 1.11 goals per game on average and Riga 3.16. The Virsliga average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 58% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 63% of Riga's.
What form are BFC Daugavpils and Riga in?
Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Riga 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Riga?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


