Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: match statistics

BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

BFC Daugavpils played Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 16 June 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

BFC Daugavpils: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

BFC Daugavpils scores 1.18 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.12 and concedes 1.47. League average: 3.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 65%, Super Nova 65%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 41%, Super Nova 59%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

BFC Daugavpils has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.12. BFC Daugavpils: 12.7 shots per match, Super Nova: 8.4.

Match halves

BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.76. Super Nova: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.47.

Goals by minute

BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (9 goals). Super Nova: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-2. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

BFC Daugavpils holds a slight edge in chance creation — home xG for the hosts is 1.5 versus Super Nova’s 1.19 xG, with averages of 12.0 shots and 4.56 shots on target per game compared to the visitors’ 8.8 and 3.7. At the same time Super Nova is more efficient in finishing: conversion rate is 11% versus the hosts’ 8%, and only 30% of their away matches end goalless while the hosts fail to score in 44% of home games. In the last 5 fixtures BFC has scored 6 goals and recorded a 1-2-2 record, averaging 1.0 point per game, while Super Nova has scored 7 goals with a 2-0-3 record and 1.2 points per game. Defensively the teams are very similar — both have conceded 25 goals this season; the hosts concede 1.0 goal on average at home, the visitors 1.2 on the road, so the defensive edge is minimal. Considering the higher xG and greater shot volume for the hosts but better efficiency from Super Nova, I expect a narrow home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BFC Daugavpils has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Super Nova has a seasonal BTTS of 40% and 60% in the last 5. The home side scores on average 1.29 and concedes 1.86 per game, while the visitors score 1.00 and concede 1.20, so both teams regularly concede goals. xG shows a similar picture: home xG 1.02 vs xG against 1.90, and Super Nova xG for 1.19 vs xG against 1.45, meaning both sides have attacking potential and defensive vulnerability. Additionally, the hosts have 0% clean sheets this season, the league has 61% of matches with BTTS and an average of 3.04 goals per game, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering the hosts' 100% seasonal BTTS, Super Nova's improvement in the last 5 matches and the shot statistics (7.86 vs 8.8 and shots on target 3.29 vs 3.7), I lean towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate total goals around 2.94 (BFC Daugavpils 1.45, Super Nova 1.49), calculated by combining seasonal xG (1.02 and 1.19) with xG from the last 5 matches (1.74 and 1.27) and opponents' average defense conceded (1.9 and 1.45). BFC defends poorly (xG against 1.9) and simultaneously has a high shot conversion of 16%, which increases their chance to score about 1.45 goals. A strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from the fact that 100% of BFC’s matches and 70% of Super Nova’s matches this season exceeded 1.5 goals, so I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at approximately 88%. Over 2.5 also looks plausible — seasonally the home team has 71% of matches with over 2.5 goals, the away team 50%, and the league averages 3.04 goals; hence my estimate of about 62% for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is unlikely: seasonally 29% of home matches reached at least 4 goals, and 0% for the away side, so I assign roughly a 15% chance for Over 3.5. In summary, the strongest play is Over 1.5 (back the line 1.5).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Super Nova are the favorites for the final victory: they have a 50% win rate versus BFC Daugavpils' 14% and a higher xG (1.19 vs 1.02), while the home side concedes an average of 1.86 goals per match compared to 1.2 conceded by the visitors. At half-time a draw is more likely — the visitors were level at the break in 50% of their matches, whereas the hosts led at half-time in 29% and were behind after 45 minutes in 43% of their home fixtures. Additionally, in BFC Daugavpils’ matches both teams scored in 100% of cases at the opponents’ stadium, and in the last five meetings the visitors averaged 1.6 points in the second half versus 0.8 for the hosts, suggesting an advantage for the away side after the break. As a result the strongest signal is a draw at half-time followed by an away win at full-time (X/2), to which I assign 35% probability; next are X/X at 20% and 2/2 at 19%, while scenarios with the home side leading are less likely (for example 1/1 at 3%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
17Shots9
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
5Shots on target1
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.84xG1.26
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
7Corners1
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
60Dangerous attacks86
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
13Fouls11
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0Cards0
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.18Goals scored / match1.12
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.47Goals conceded / match1.47
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
48%Average possession43%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4.59Shots on target / match3.53
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.65Shots per match8.41
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
4.59Shots on target3.53
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
9.3%Shot conversion13.3%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
48%Possession43%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.51xG for1.12
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.59xG against1.64
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Shooting quality

BFC Daugavpils: BalancedSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.2 pts / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils
LWLDD
Season result split
29% W24% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-8
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-5
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Super Nova
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W12% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-9
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BFC Daugavpils is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.18 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.12 goals / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

20Goals scored (season)19
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
25Goals conceded (season)25
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
2.65Average goals in match2.59
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
6Goals scored (last 5)7
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal82%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
29%2 goals24%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
12%3 goals6%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0%4 goals0%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal82%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
29%2 goals47%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
18%3 goals12%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
12%4 goals6%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

6%BTTS at half-time29%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0%BTTS in both halves0%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
18%Scored in both halves6%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
80%BTTS - last 560%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time18%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BFC Daugavpils is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.12 pts / match - Super Nova

BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
24% leading53% draw24% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.12
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.41Goals scored (1st half)0.65
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.76Average goals (1st half)1.53
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
71%Clean sheet before half-time47%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
71%No goal before half-time53%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.24
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.47
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.12Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.06
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
18%Clean sheet after half-time47%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova
35%No goal after half-time59%
BFC DaugavpilsSuper Nova

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

12% W53% R35% P
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Super Nova - second-half results

35% W18% R47% P
19
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

BFC Daugavpils - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.40.2
Average goals in match2.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet20%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
4
3
31-45
9
9
46-60
3
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
10
31-45
2
4
46-60
1
1
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.62
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
86%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
5% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
5%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

BFC DaugavpilsLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 2.653.04 2.59
Both teams scored 65%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%55% 59%
Clean sheets 12%20% 18%
Goal before half-time 53%78% 71%
Goal after half-time 94%86% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.04
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Artem HarzhaOff: Abdoul Kader Traore
  2. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Alens GrikovsOff: Kristers Skadmanis
  3. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Ralfs ŠitjakovsOff: Ndiaye Pathé
  4. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Rikuto IidaOff: Amadou Samaté

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): BFC Daugavpils 0 - 3 - 2 Super Nova. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.

BFC Daugavpils
0 : 1
Super Nova
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
2 : 2
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
SK Super Nova
4 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 0:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 0, Super Nova won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?

BFC Daugavpils score 1.18 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.12. The Virsliga average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 65% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 65% of Super Nova's.

What form are BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Super Nova 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.