BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: match statistics
BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
BFC Daugavpils played Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 16 June 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
BFC Daugavpils: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Super Nova: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
BFC Daugavpils scores 1.18 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.12 and concedes 1.47. League average: 3.04 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: BFC Daugavpils 65%, Super Nova 65%. Over 2.5: BFC Daugavpils 41%, Super Nova 59%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
BFC Daugavpils has higher xG: 1.51 vs 1.12. BFC Daugavpils: 12.7 shots per match, Super Nova: 8.4.
Match halves
BFC Daugavpils: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.76. Super Nova: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
BFC Daugavpils: 46-60 (9 goals). Super Nova: 16-30 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Virsliga: 3.04 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-2. Average goals 2.80, BTTS 80%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
BFC Daugavpils holds a slight edge in chance creation — home xG for the hosts is 1.5 versus Super Nova’s 1.19 xG, with averages of 12.0 shots and 4.56 shots on target per game compared to the visitors’ 8.8 and 3.7. At the same time Super Nova is more efficient in finishing: conversion rate is 11% versus the hosts’ 8%, and only 30% of their away matches end goalless while the hosts fail to score in 44% of home games. In the last 5 fixtures BFC has scored 6 goals and recorded a 1-2-2 record, averaging 1.0 point per game, while Super Nova has scored 7 goals with a 2-0-3 record and 1.2 points per game. Defensively the teams are very similar — both have conceded 25 goals this season; the hosts concede 1.0 goal on average at home, the visitors 1.2 on the road, so the defensive edge is minimal. Considering the higher xG and greater shot volume for the hosts but better efficiency from Super Nova, I expect a narrow home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BFC Daugavpils has a seasonal BTTS rate of 100% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Super Nova has a seasonal BTTS of 40% and 60% in the last 5. The home side scores on average 1.29 and concedes 1.86 per game, while the visitors score 1.00 and concede 1.20, so both teams regularly concede goals. xG shows a similar picture: home xG 1.02 vs xG against 1.90, and Super Nova xG for 1.19 vs xG against 1.45, meaning both sides have attacking potential and defensive vulnerability. Additionally, the hosts have 0% clean sheets this season, the league has 61% of matches with BTTS and an average of 3.04 goals per game, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Considering the hosts' 100% seasonal BTTS, Super Nova's improvement in the last 5 matches and the shot statistics (7.86 vs 8.8 and shots on target 3.29 vs 3.7), I lean towards BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total goals around 2.94 (BFC Daugavpils 1.45, Super Nova 1.49), calculated by combining seasonal xG (1.02 and 1.19) with xG from the last 5 matches (1.74 and 1.27) and opponents' average defense conceded (1.9 and 1.45). BFC defends poorly (xG against 1.9) and simultaneously has a high shot conversion of 16%, which increases their chance to score about 1.45 goals. A strong signal for Over 1.5 comes from the fact that 100% of BFC’s matches and 70% of Super Nova’s matches this season exceeded 1.5 goals, so I assess the probability of Over 1.5 at approximately 88%. Over 2.5 also looks plausible — seasonally the home team has 71% of matches with over 2.5 goals, the away team 50%, and the league averages 3.04 goals; hence my estimate of about 62% for Over 2.5. Over 3.5 is unlikely: seasonally 29% of home matches reached at least 4 goals, and 0% for the away side, so I assign roughly a 15% chance for Over 3.5. In summary, the strongest play is Over 1.5 (back the line 1.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Super Nova are the favorites for the final victory: they have a 50% win rate versus BFC Daugavpils' 14% and a higher xG (1.19 vs 1.02), while the home side concedes an average of 1.86 goals per match compared to 1.2 conceded by the visitors. At half-time a draw is more likely — the visitors were level at the break in 50% of their matches, whereas the hosts led at half-time in 29% and were behind after 45 minutes in 43% of their home fixtures. Additionally, in BFC Daugavpils’ matches both teams scored in 100% of cases at the opponents’ stadium, and in the last five meetings the visitors averaged 1.6 points in the second half versus 0.8 for the hosts, suggesting an advantage for the away side after the break. As a result the strongest signal is a draw at half-time followed by an away win at full-time (X/2), to which I assign 35% probability; next are X/X at 20% and 2/2 at 19%, while scenarios with the home side leading are less likely (for example 1/1 at 3%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| BFC Daugavpils | Super Nova | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Super Nova is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.2 pts / match - Super Nova
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
BFC Daugavpils is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.12 goals / match - Super Nova
BFC Daugavpils scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (3 of 17 matches).
Super Nova scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - BFC Daugavpils
Over / Under - Super Nova
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
BFC Daugavpils is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.24 pts / match - BFC Daugavpils · 1.12 pts / match - Super Nova
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
BFC Daugavpils - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Super Nova - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
BFC Daugavpils
Super Nova
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).
Teams vs league
| BFC Daugavpils | Liga | Super Nova | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.65 | 3.04 | ▼ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 61% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 55% | ▲ 59% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 20% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 78% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): BFC Daugavpils 0 - 3 - 2 Super Nova. Average goals 2.80, both teams scored in 80% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?
The Virsliga match finished BFC Daugavpils 0:0 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches BFC Daugavpils won 0, Super Nova won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?
BFC Daugavpils score 1.18 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.12. The Virsliga average is 3.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 65% of BFC Daugavpils's matches and 65% of Super Nova's.
What form are BFC Daugavpils and Super Nova in?
Over the last 5 games BFC Daugavpils have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Super Nova 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for BFC Daugavpils vs Super Nova: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


