England - ChampionshipData current as of 13 September 2026

Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics

155%(1.75)
X27%(3.85)
218%(4.75)

Birmingham City presents a clear advantage as the host with a 47% home win rate and an impressive +13 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts record an average of 1.82 goals per home match with only 6% of games without scoring, which proves their solid offense. Queens Park Rangers has a poor away form with a 39% defeat rate and a negative -11 goal difference, scoring an average of only 0.94 goals on the road. The xG statistics also favor Birmingham (1.89 vs 1.20), confirming their superiority in creating chances. Even though the last 5 matches for both teams have not been successful, Birmingham maintains greater stability on their home turf and should exploit the defensive weaknesses of the visitors, who concede an average of 1.56 goals away from home.

Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Birmingham City played Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match was played on 11 March 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Birmingham City: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Birmingham City scores 1.28 and concedes 1.31 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.28 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.60 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Birmingham City 56%, Queens Park Rangers 64%. Over 2.5: Birmingham City 50%, Queens Park Rangers 64%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Birmingham City has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.40. Birmingham City: 13.8 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 12.6.

Match halves

Birmingham City: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Birmingham City: 76-90+ (10 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.60 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Birmingham City presents a clear advantage as the host with a 47% home win rate and an impressive +13 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts record an average of 1.82 goals per home match with only 6% of games without scoring, which proves their solid offense. Queens Park Rangers has a poor away form with a 39% defeat rate and a negative -11 goal difference, scoring an average of only 0.94 goals on the road. The xG statistics also favor Birmingham (1.89 vs 1.20), confirming their superiority in creating chances. Even though the last 5 matches for both teams have not been successful, Birmingham maintains greater stability on their home turf and should exploit the defensive weaknesses of the visitors, who concede an average of 1.56 goals away from home.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
21Shots10
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
6Shots on target1
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
2.26xG0.91
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10Corners1
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
72Dangerous attacks27
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
9Fouls9
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
4Cards0
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.28Goals scored / match1.28
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.31Goals conceded / match1.61
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
54%Average possession46%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
3.86Shots on target / match3.86
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.75Shots per match12.64
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
3.86Shots on target3.86
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
9.3%Shot conversion10.1%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
54%Possession46%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.49xG for1.4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.23xG against1.35
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Shooting quality

Birmingham City: BalancedQueens Park Rangers: Balanced
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)28%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Birmingham City is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Birmingham City · 0.6 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Birmingham City
DWLLL
Season result split
36% W28% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-10-13
1.36 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-7-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Queens Park Rangers
LWLLL
Season result split
36% W22% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-15
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-7
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Birmingham City is 23% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.31 goals / match - Birmingham City · 1.61 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Birmingham City scoring profile: very strong

Birmingham City scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: very strong

Queens Park Rangers scores in 75% of matches (27 of 36 matches), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

46Goals scored (season)46
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
47Goals conceded (season)58
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
2.58Average goals in match2.89
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
3Goals scored (last 5)4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
8Goals conceded (last 5)15
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
33%2 goals31%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
11%3 goals19%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
8%4 goals3%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal75%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
33%2 goals42%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
19%3 goals22%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0%4 goals11%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
Queens Park Rangers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.23 of 36 matches
56%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time19%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
8%BTTS in both halves3%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
22%Scored in both halves22%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
40%BTTS - last 540%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time31%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Birmingham City - half-time state
31% leading25% draw44% trailing
Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
25% leading39% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.14
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.36
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
44%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
58%No goal before half-time56%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.36
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.53
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
47%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
44%No goal after half-time47%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Birmingham City - second-half results

33% W39% D28% L
42
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
50
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

33% W36% D31% L
41
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Birmingham City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Queens Park Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.4
Average goals in match2.01.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-6-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Birmingham City
ScoredConceded
7
9
0-15
7
10
16-30
7
8
31-45
8
8
46-60
7
6
61-75
10
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
4
9
16-30
11
14
31-45
3
15
46-60
9
7
61-75
14
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+10%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Birmingham City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.71
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Birmingham CityLigaQueens Park Rangers
Average goals in match 2.582.60 2.89
Both teams scored 56%56% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%51% 64%
Clean sheets 22%25% 25%
Goal before half-time 81%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 83%78% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.60
Average goals per match
56%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Birmingham CityGoalPatrick RobertsAssist: Ibrahim Osman
  2. Birmingham CityYellow cardIbrahim Osman
  3. Birmingham CityYellow cardEthan Laird
  4. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Rhys Norrington-DaviesOff: Steve Anthony Cook
  5. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Kwame PokuOff: Paul Patrick Smyth
  6. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Isaac HaydenOff: Jake Clarke-Salter
  7. Birmingham CityYellow cardJames Beadle
  8. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Kyogo FuruhashiOff: Jay Stansfield
  9. Birmingham CityYellow cardDemarai Ramelle Gray

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Anthony BackhouseMatches officiated: 24
4.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 267%Home wins4%Draws28%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Birmingham City 0 - 0 - 1 Queens Park Rangers. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

The Championship match finished Birmingham City 1:0 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

Birmingham City score 1.28 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.28. The Championship average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Birmingham City's matches and 64% of Queens Park Rangers's.

What form are Birmingham City and Queens Park Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Birmingham City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.