England - ChampionshipSt. Andrew's StadiumData current as of 19 October 2026

Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers: match statistics

Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Birmingham City played Queens Park Rangers in Championship (England). The match was played on 17 October 2026. Venue: St. Andrew's Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Birmingham City: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Queens Park Rangers: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Birmingham City scores 1.70 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Queens Park Rangers scores 1.50 and concedes 0.90. League average: 2.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Birmingham City 70%, Queens Park Rangers 70%. Over 2.5: Birmingham City 70%, Queens Park Rangers 50%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Queens Park Rangers has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.61. Birmingham City: 14.0 shots per match, Queens Park Rangers: 15.4.

Match halves

Birmingham City: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.80. Queens Park Rangers: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Birmingham City: 31-45+ (7 goals). Queens Park Rangers: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Championship: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

A draw looks the most likely outcome: Birmingham have drawn all 4 of their home matches so far, while Queens Park Rangers have drawn 3 of their 5 away games. However, the hosts are in better recent form, winning 2 of their last 5 matches and scoring 8 goals, while the visitors are yet to win and have scored just 4. At home, Birmingham average 1.75 goals from an xG of 1.56, giving them greater attacking potential than QPR’s away averages of 1.4 goals and 1.31 xG. On the other hand, the visitors concede just 0.8 goals per away match, while Birmingham allow opponents to score an average of 1.75 goals at home. These contrasting strengths, combined with both teams’ tendency to draw, point to the points being shared.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes scenario is supported by both teams scoring in 50% of Birmingham’s matches and 80% of Queens Park Rangers’ matches, compared with a league average of 66%. Across their last five games, both teams scored in 80% of Birmingham’s matches and 60% of QPR’s, while conceding an average of 1.4 and 1.0 goals per game, respectively. Birmingham average 2.27 xG against the 1.46 xG conceded by QPR, which points to a home goal despite Birmingham scoring just 1.0 goal per game on average. The greater risk to this selection is the visitors’ attack: they have scored only 0.8 goals per game recently, while Birmingham have failed to score in 50% of their matches. However, QPR’s season average of 1.4 goals suggests an away goal remains a realistic possibility.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 75% of Birmingham’s home matches and 80% of Queens Park Rangers’ away games. The scoring averages also support this line — the hosts score and concede 1.0 goal per game, while the visitors average 1.4 scored and 0.8 conceded. However, Birmingham’s attacking potential should not be underestimated: their average xG is 2.27, compared with 1.31 for the visitors, which argues against setting the line as low as 1.5 goals. Birmingham’s last five matches produced an average of 3.0 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of them. In contrast, the visitors’ last five games averaged just 1.8 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 20%. A total-goals forecast of 2.5 accounts for these conflicting signals and gives Under 3.5 a clearer edge than either pick at the 2.5-goal line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is likely, as Queens Park Rangers were level at the break in 3 of their 5 matches so far, and this outcome occurred twice in each team’s last five matches. Although the visitors average 1.0 first-half goals compared with Birmingham’s 0.25, their advantage in this phase may not last until full-time. The hosts average 2.27 xG compared with the visitors’ 1.31 and register 6.5 shots on target per match against 4.0, increasing their chances of turning the game around after the break. In their last five matches, Birmingham won the second half in 60% of games, compared with QPR’s 20%; the visitors failed to score after half-time in 4 of those 5 matches. Therefore, a draw at half-time followed by a Birmingham win is the strongest single scenario, although QPR’s run of 4 draws in their last 5 matches means a draw after 90 minutes remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
11Shots12
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
5Shots on target4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.32xG1.29
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0Corners4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
37Dangerous attacks33
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
13Fouls7
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
2Cards2
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.7Goals scored / match1.5
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.1Goals conceded / match0.9
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
51%Average possession49%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
4.8Shots on target / match5.3
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match15.4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
4.8Shots on target5.3
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
12.1%Shot conversion9.7%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
51%Possession49%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.61xG for1.7
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.3xG against1.38
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Shooting quality

Birmingham City: AttackingQueens Park Rangers: Attacking
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
Accuracy (shots on target)34%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Birmingham City is 43% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Birmingham City · 1.4 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Birmingham City
LWDWW
Season result split
40% W50% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-1
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-0
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
DDDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Queens Park Rangers
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
40% W50% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-1
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-0
Last 5 away
2-3-0
WWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Birmingham City is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.7 goals / match - Birmingham City · 1.5 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Queens Park Rangers is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Birmingham City · 0.9 goals / match - Queens Park Rangers

Birmingham City scoring profile: very strong

Birmingham City scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Queens Park Rangers keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

Queens Park Rangers scoring profile: strong

Queens Park Rangers scores in 70% of matches (7 of 10 matches), while Birmingham City keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

17Goals scored (season)15
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
11Goals conceded (season)9
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
2.8Average goals in match2.4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10Goals scored (last 5)8
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
5Goals conceded (last 5)5
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal70%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
60%2 goals50%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10%3 goals20%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10%4 goals10%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal80%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
40%2 goals10%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0%3 goals0%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0%4 goals0%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

70%
Queens Park Rangers - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 10 matches
66%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time20%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10%BTTS in both halves0%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
40%Scored in both halves20%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
60%BTTS - last 580%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Queens Park Rangers is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / match - Birmingham City · 1.6 pts / match - Queens Park Rangers

Birmingham City - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing
Queens Park Rangers - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per match (1st half)1.6
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.7Average goals (1st half)1.4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
40%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
40%No goal before half-time50%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
0.3Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
70%Clean sheet after half-time60%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers
30%No goal after half-time60%
Birmingham CityQueens Park Rangers

Birmingham City - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
13
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Queens Park Rangers - second-half results

20% W70% D10% L
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Birmingham City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Queens Park Rangers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.61.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Birmingham City
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Queens Park Rangers
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
2
16-30
6
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-23%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
63%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Birmingham City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

Queens Park Rangers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Championship).

Teams vs league

Birmingham CityLigaQueens Park Rangers
Average goals in match▼ 2.802.93▼ 2.40
Both teams scored▲ 70%66%▲ 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 70%63%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▲ 30%20%• 20%
Goal before half-time▲ 90%78%▼ 70%
Goal after half-time▼ 70%80%▼ 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per match
66%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Birmingham CityYellow cardJhon Elmer Solis Romero
  2. Birmingham CityGoalLiam MillarAssist: Tomoki Iwata
  3. Queens Park RangersYellow cardHarvey James Vale
  4. Birmingham CityGoalLiam MillarAssist: Tomoki Iwata
  5. Queens Park RangersYellow cardRayan Kolli
  6. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Richard KoneOff: Rayan Kolli
  7. Birmingham CityYellow cardChristoph Klarer
  8. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Demarai Ramelle GrayOff: Liam Millar
  9. Queens Park RangersSubstitutionOn: Jonathan VaraneOff: Jake Clarke-Salter
  10. Birmingham CitySubstitutionOn: Luis VásquezOff: August Priske
  11. Birmingham CityGoalDemarai Ramelle GrayAssist: Luis Vásquez

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Birmingham City 1 - 0 - 1 Queens Park Rangers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

The Championship match finished Birmingham City 3:0 Queens Park Rangers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Birmingham City and Queens Park Rangers?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Birmingham City won 1, Queens Park Rangers won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

Birmingham City score 1.70 goals per game on average and Queens Park Rangers 1.50. The Championship average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Birmingham City's matches and 70% of Queens Park Rangers's.

What form are Birmingham City and Queens Park Rangers in?

Over the last 5 games Birmingham City have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Queens Park Rangers 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Birmingham City vs Queens Park Rangers?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.